Cerny said it was designed with price cuts in mind. If they can't drop $100 without taking a loss after two years on the market then his design failed.
PlayStation should not become a loss leader again, but they absolutely should go for the maximum market saturation possible while staying profitable.
I hope I stand corrected on this - but I doubt Sony drops by $100 - not now. But if they're in the number one spot right now and are $50 more than the competition - why would you drop by $100 - it just doesn't make sense. They have the product, mindshare and sales victories through the majority of the year. I think they stay priced above Xbox since they have a higher perceived value with power, brand, etc., etc.
All these posts about how Sony cut the price of the PS1/PS2 - have to take into account that Sony was a different company 15 years ago. 15 years ago - they were able to make these decisions because they were dominating consumer electronics (tv's, walkmans, camera's/camcorders, computers) and as a whole were making money. They even had a different market standing as the innovator/leader of consumer electronics. Those days are long gone and Sony has to be very careful about what they do with their new golden egg.
I hope I stand corrected on this - but I doubt Sony drops by $100 - not now. But if they're in the number one spot right now and are $50 more than the competition - why would you drop by $100 - it just doesn't make sense. They have the product, mindshare and sales victories through the majority of the year. I think they stay priced above Xbox since they have a higher perceived value with power, brand, etc., etc.
Bundle software (not PS Plus) and maybe an extra controller/camera and they're good. If they have a hardware revision/redesign and throw a 1TB drive in there - same price (but add a game or two).
Because it's not just about beating the competition, it's about increasing market share, brand growth and reaching new audience (the casual audience who won't pay $400 for a console), which means more profits long term.
I completely agree with your statement but the point that I (and many posters) am making is that from a business standpoint - you don't drop the price of your product/service when it's doing good, period. In in Sony's case the PS4 is doing very well and breaking records. Dropping 25% of the price when sales are strong just doesn't seem like the right business decision.
All these posts about how Sony is a different company 15 years ago have to take into account that the PS4 is a different system than the PS1/PS2/PS3. It didn't begin its life as a loss leader and was designed to drop in price faster. If it cannot, then that design failed.
I do not believe that design has failed.
If dropping the price leads to better profits in long term, then it's the right business decision.
Why do you sound so concerned like you're a share holder of Sony or something? A price drop to $299 for the PS4 isn't going to bankrupt the whole company or something. They'll still make money with PS Plus subscriptions, game licenses and others. In short, price drops are more important in the long term business strategy.All these posts about how Sony cut the price of the PS1/PS2 - have to take into account that Sony was a different company 15 years ago. 15 years ago - they were able to make these decisions because they were dominating consumer electronics (tv's, walkmans, camera's/camcorders, computers) and as a whole were making money. They even had a different market standing as the innovator/leader of consumer electronics. Those days are long gone and Sony has to be very careful about what they do with their new golden egg.
I hope I stand corrected on this - but I doubt Sony drops by $100 - not now. But if they're in the number one spot right now and are $50 more than the competition - why would you drop by $100 - it just doesn't make sense. They have the product, mindshare and sales victories through the majority of the year. I think they stay priced above Xbox since they have a higher perceived value with power, brand, etc., etc.
Bundle software (not PS Plus) and maybe an extra controller/camera and they're good. If they have a hardware revision/redesign and throw a 1TB drive in there - same price (but add a game or two).
All these posts about how Sony cut the price of the PS1/PS2 - have to take into account that Sony was a different company 15 years ago. 15 years ago - they were able to make these decisions because they were dominating consumer electronics (tv's, walkmans, camera's/camcorders, computers) and as a whole were making money. They even had a different market standing as the innovator/leader of consumer electronics. Those days are long gone and Sony has to be very careful about what they do with their new golden egg.
I hope I stand corrected on this - but I doubt Sony drops by $100 - not now. But if they're in the number one spot right now and are $50 more than the competition - why would you drop by $100 - it just doesn't make sense. They have the product, mindshare and sales victories through the majority of the year. I think they stay priced above Xbox since they have a higher perceived value with power, brand, etc., etc.
Bundle software (not PS Plus) and maybe an extra controller/camera and they're good. If they have a hardware revision/redesign and throw a 1TB drive in there - same price (but add a game or two).
Why do you sound so concerned like you're a share holder of Sony or something? A price drop to $299 for the PS4 isn't going to bankrupt the whole company or something. They'll still make money with PS Plus subscriptions, game licenses and others. In short, price drops are more important in the long term business strategy.
PS3 says : HI!!! Sony was in BAD situation then and they dropped PS3 price for 100$.
Right bad situation and not selling consoles. Now they're in a good situation with the PS4 and selling tons. So.....why drop exactly?
Hasn't Sony stated many times that the ps4 is their best selling console of all time?
Could you please tell me the difference?You mean fastest selling?
It's far from the best selling.
Could you please tell me the difference?
I guess afterwards it's obvious, but right now I don't get it.
Could you please tell me the difference?
I guess afterwards it's obvious, but right now I don't get it.
Right bad situation and not selling consoles. Now they're in a good situation with the PS4 and selling tons. So.....why drop exactly?
What?? It has EVERYTHING to do with the financial situation of Sony. Atm - this is Sony's cake and one of its greatest performers and you can bet that they are exploring every avenue for gains/losses with price drops. We don't even know the profit margins of the machine. Hypothetically speaking, what If they were to drop by $100 and LOSE on every console they sell? Right now - Sony AS A WHOLE are trying to re-establish themselves and become a profitable company.
We're all predicting here, but Sony will definitely still make profits from the PS4, although it may not be the hardware itself. At launch, Sony was selling the PS4 at a slight loss, but a few months later, it was actually profitable. Fast forward a year and say, 10 months, and we can be quite sure that when Sony does a price drop, the PS4 will cost around $299 to manufacture, maybe slightly more. So it's a logical step for Sony to take a small loss for a while for the long term benefits.LOL - sound concerned? Different takes on business is that really hard to understand. No one said they were going bankrupt. Neither you or I know what their ledgers look like so you thinking you know definitively how they will turn profit in the long term is questionable. I'm commenting on what I think they will do/not do. It's a forum where people have discussions and offer opinions.
All these posts about how Sony cut the price of the PS1/PS2 - have to take into account that Sony was a different company 15 years ago. 15 years ago - they were able to make these decisions because they were dominating consumer electronics (tv's, walkmans, camera's/camcorders, computers) and as a whole were making money. They even had a different market standing as the innovator/leader of consumer electronics. Those days are long gone and Sony has to be very careful about what they do with their new golden egg.
I hope I stand corrected on this - but I doubt Sony drops by $100 - not now. But if they're in the number one spot right now and are $50 more than the competition - why would you drop by $100 - it just doesn't make sense. They have the product, mindshare and sales victories through the majority of the year. I think they stay priced above Xbox since they have a higher perceived value with power, brand, etc., etc.
Bundle software (not PS Plus) and maybe an extra controller/camera and they're good. If they have a hardware revision/redesign and throw a 1TB drive in there - same price (but add a game or two).
Just made this. Might be useful for some-
![]()
If possible, could you send me your PS2 sales data? I only have up to 2010 and would like to have more a more complete spreadsheet.
2012 is estimated on the back of the final LTD number of 46.4m
2011 is estimated using leaked/percentages/other data.
2000-2010 is very accurate NPD data.
I'll put together a spreadsheet and send them over to you soon. Need to sleep first!
Because it's not just about beating the competition, it's about increasing market share, brand growth and reaching new audience (the casual audience who won't pay $400 for a console), which means more profits long term.
We're all predicting here, but Sony will definitely still make profits from the PS4, although it may not be the hardware itself. At launch, Sony was selling the PS4 at a slight loss, but a few months later, it was actually profitable. Fast forward a year and say, 10 months, and we can be quite sure that when Sony does a price drop, the PS4 will cost around $299 to manufacture, maybe slightly more. So it's a logical step for Sony to take a small loss for a while for the long term benefits.
article date said:Nov 19th 2013 by Rob Jackson
Rob Jackson said:That leaves a measly $18 of profit margin, but...
Wrong, Ps4 costs only ~$381 to build and it was sold at $400 day one. Profit of $18 at launch
http://ps4daily.com/2013/11/playstation-4-cost-to-build/
Just made this. Might be useful for some-
![]()
Man...the PS3 fell off a cliff really fast in the US.
Like ZHuge said, this doesn't take into account R&D and other stuff. Either way, this further proves my point that a price drop to $299 is good for Sony and the PS4.Wrong, Ps4 costs only ~$381 to build and it was sold at $400 day one. Profit of $18 at launch
http://ps4daily.com/2013/11/playstation-4-cost-to-build/
Wrong, Ps4 costs only ~$381 to build and it was sold at $400 day one. Profit of $18 at launch
http://ps4daily.com/2013/11/playstation-4-cost-to-build/
Just made this. Might be useful for some-
![]()
For those that work in retail, how was Xbox One's momentum/sales compared to February? That's the only one I'm iffy on if I should put it above or below February this month.
PS4 manufacturing price is now lower. Sony talked in Q1/Q2 2014 that that they manged to reduce price more quickly than they anticipated.
So, in 2014 PS4 has sold better than PS3 managed even in its best years [in the US]. Interesting.
It is also sad that PS3 sold so poorly in 2013. In that year Sony released IMO too much awesome 1st party exclusives for that system [GOW:A, TLOU, Beyond, GT6 and Puppeteer, MS had jack shit for x360 [Gears Judgement]]. But moving some of them to PS4 would not have increased sales for them. Console was sold out regardless of games.
It baffles me that Puppeteer is still not ported to PS4.
So most of those AC bundles were from the holiday season, right? It's amazing how much Microsoft overshipped. How is the Halo MCC bundle doing now that the AC bundles are starting to be out of stock?Well, I said in one of my previous posts that the XB1 momentum didn't drop off a cliff, or anything. It didn't suddenly dry up and vanish by any means. But it doesn't seem as good on a weekly level as the previous month. Hasn't really been any big standout push, the Halo bundles are the primary consoles being sold, but some of our stores are still working through their AC Unity bundles, and they're not a totally 'endangered SKU' so to speak. We're not getting more of the AC bundles shipped to us, but they still haven't cleared out.
Just made this. Might be useful for some-
![]()
If the previous year's sales are any indication, the PS4 sales in the US is slightly more than a third of global sales, roughly 36%. So if we predict that the PS4 will sell through 36 million at the end of this year, the cumulative sales in the US will be around 12.9 million. I'm not sure what the sales in the US were as of 31st December 2014, though.What's the prediction of USA PS4 sales in 2015? 6-7mil if the $50 pricedrop comes before holidays? 6mil without pricedrop [but with bundled games]?
So most of those AC bundles were from the holiday season, right? It's amazing how much Microsoft overshipped. How is the Halo MCC bundle doing now that the AC bundles are starting to be out of stock?
I see. This is in line with what I've been seeing on the Amazon hourly charts for the past few days. The Halo MCC bundle effectively replacing the AC bundle. Now it all makes sense. Thanks a lot for the info, Abdiel.Our DCs have had a just absolute ton of those AC bundles since December, and we're finally bleeding them down to the last vestiges. And really, even that's become a crawl, because the Halo bundle has largely just replaced sales of the AC bundle, so there's no increase in speed of sales, at all.