efyu_lemonardo
May I have a cookie?
wait, are there not going to be space battles?
what about seamless transitions from air to space?
what about seamless transitions from air to space?
Leaked Battlefront info (40 players, heroes, free Ep7 DLC, FPS & TPS) [Full Screens]
- Thread starter Sn4ke_911
- Start date
UnforgivenTwin
Member
You're right,you should leave.
Rogue_Ledr
Banned
40 PLAYERS?!?!?!
WTF!?!?!?! That is unacceptably low.
It better be 64 on PC!
WTF!?!?!?! That is unacceptably low.
It better be 64 on PC!
JumPeRJumPzZ
Banned
No it isnt... More isnt always better...
It's not unprecedented. Photogrammetry was used in Ethan Carter, and PBR is in Order 1886, MGSV GZ, Second Son...
Yeah, it's not like there would be more than 40 people fighting in a major star wars war scenario.
None of the above....
EroticSushi
Member
Unacceptably low? The maps are going to be designed for 40 players. How is it unacceptably low? BF2 has a lower player count and felt awesome.
Rogue_Ledr
Banned
More IS always better.
Having more options is ALWAYS a good thing.
If people want smaller games, they can play in smaller games.
JumPeRJumPzZ
Banned
efyu_lemonardo
May I have a cookie?
that makes me sad... so much time has passed since Free Radical's version was canned I expected these to be a given..
Star Wars Battlefront 2 on PC supported 64 player matches.
Rogue_Ledr
Banned
Dude, its basically the same thing, only in the SW Universe.
I've played the previous games, they were CLEARLY meant to emulate Battlefield.
THIS!
Hence, why it better be 64 on PC!
They should turn it into 10v10 to get that star wars battlefront feeling.
JumPeRJumPzZ
Banned
And this is not a Sequel
You people complaining about the player count should simply wait for real gameplay footage or a beta. Until then accept the 40 player cap.
OdysseusVA
Banned
REKT Nayon
DICE never said they were going to do this. That was the old canceled BF3.
This is for all intents and purposes a reboot.
Xaero Gravity
NEXT LEVEL lame™
Hehehehe.
Akiyama_AE
Member
Never played a Battlefront game but kinda interested in this maybe in E3 there will be some gameplay that will seal the deal
UnforgivenTwin
Member
Haha
Grammer nazi. I will correct that immediately.Smoked. Hope he's ok.
40 is just fine tbh
Congrats on BF: Hardline.
I don't know what deal you made with the devil for that.
Xaero Gravity
NEXT LEVEL lame™
Guilty as charged. ;_;
Dr. Kitty Muffins
Member
I don't think I will pay full price at launch if there is no single player campaign. Plus DICE can't be trusted to release a game without lots of bugs.
Wrong, more is worse when it's just thrown in for the hell of it. If dice thinks this should only be 40 it's obviously for a reason. I'm sure they would've done more if they felt it was right but 40 is what they went with so people should just deal with it.
No campaign meaning this is a pvp game, right?
But how does split screen work when it says 8-40 players, and not minimum 2 players?
Reading about the gane on wikipedia answers no questions.
There are missions that take place on the multiplayer maps against bots. Think of them as "Star Wars moments". There isn't a campaign in the sense of a fully scripted linear story with a ton of set pieces.
I have no problem believing that this is what the game will look like if you have the PC specs to run it.
A.D. Skinner
Member
Is there ANYTHING resembling galactic conquest?!
We know of only one game mode right now, Walker Assault. I'm sure they'll reveal more soon.
Nothing as of right now. Doubtful with the lack of space battles at launch, but maybe a feature added later. Guess we'll have to wait for E3 to find out.
64 player battles haven't been good in a Battlefield game since BF2.
Murder. She Wrote
Member
I can understand not having space battles but no galactic conquest? Wtf that's the best game mode
Because part of being a fanboy or a victim of hype is defending anything and everything about your game of choice.
64 isn't better if you look at BF3 and 4. The majority of the maps are too small for 64 players. On the flip side, the maps feel too large for 32 players. Somewhere inbetween is the sweet spot in those games for most maps. 48 players seems to have that magic balance between running into action frequently enough while avoiding things like getting shot in the back every 5 seconds. If they are approaching this game with similar map sizes in mind, 40 will be fine I think.
RealityCheque
Banned
In game/in engine is very much a grey area as far as descriptions go. It can and will be easily misconstrued.
And the trailer I saw had a very big PlayStation banner at the start, which can and will give the impression that this is how it will look on a ps4. Which it wont.
Is it so much to ask for a little sensible honesty? Or just show us the game? Its videogames, not movies. Show some gameplay and immediately avoid all the questions.
IAmRandom31
Banned
Sounds like a ton of corner cutting to get the game out in time.
Sad to see. Just at the very least make what you do get out incredibly well polished. No online issues at launch, no performance issues or whatever please
Sad to see. Just at the very least make what you do get out incredibly well polished. No online issues at launch, no performance issues or whatever please
UnforgivenTwin
Member
now,you must be punished.
Yeah, I'm just hoping that whatever they release, it ends up working. I'll certainly be holding off on getting it to see how the launch pans out.
A really neat mock-up from the other thread, made by EuropeOG.
This is basically what DICE is promising the game will look like, lol.
This is basically what DICE is promising the game will look like, lol.
RealityCheque
Banned
I absolutely agree that this is achievable with a very awesome PC. But the big PlayStation banner at the start of the video is "misleading" at best.