The Witcher 3 PS4 gameplay

He's obviously joking

A perfect 100 would be pretty hilarious, though. I wonder if it's something that'll happen someday. A game so fucking good even the biggest attention-seeking edgelords have to give it a ten outta ten.

Yes, exactly that. I think this is the ultimate goal of evolution - creat sentient life so that it can make the best viedeogame of all time. It will happen, maybe the Witcher 4.
 
I played the Witcher 2. And, I already explained why I thought it was bad like Game of Thrones in a previous post. I've seen alot of footage of this game to let me know it's not much better this time around. Also, the voice acting of Geralt seems even worse this time.

Examples please.
 
Y'all are crazy if you don't think this game is getting atleast a 90 on metacritic. It wont deserve it...but it'll get it. It's the Dark Souls 2 effect, reviewers didn't want to get claimed as "casual gamers" so they gave it high scores despite how lame it was. Dark Souls 1 didn't get that much recognition by critics because it was the first one of those games to go multiplatfrom and then later went on to be a niche breakout hit that earned mainstream recognition. This is the same thing, if you think this game is going to get low scores because of it's "hardcore" nature - you know nothing about this industry because it's actually the opposite case. There has been nothing but positive press for this game, from it's consumer friendly DLC practices to CD Projekt Rekts humble uphill climb as a "top tier" developer.

This game has everything that appeals to critics:

Generic white protagonist: Batman wannabe complex, gruff, unshaven, loner, etc.

Bad writing that people pretend/think is good like Game of Thrones (the show)

Tired ass midevil fantasy setting

Story focused game

Slightly above average graphics with a somewhat decent art style

Shitty combat (they praise Assassins Creed year after year, they'll praise this too if the game itself isn't broken.)

All of that is just off the top of my head.

I can see Polygon and Kotaku critiqueing the way sex and female characters are handled but they'll still suck on CD Projekt Rekts dick.

I hope the game is fun but it just looks like a Assassins Creed game if Ubisoft didn't annualize them and also had slightly better writing (but still shitty) and better combat (but still shitty).

EDIT: I forgot to also mention most AAA games this gen have sucked or been underwhelming so that will also play to the games favor of getting a 90+.

43i9tLV.gif
 
Generic white protagonist: Batman wannabe complex, gruff, unshaven, loner, etc.

That doesn't make it a bad game.

Bad writing that people pretend/think is good like Game of Thrones (the show)

To be fair, I'd say it is at least decent writing for a game. Story in games is kinda hard to do well because you don't have full control over what people do. Especially if you are trying to give them choice. Plus you kinda have to have Macguffins to give you a reason to move in a certain direction.

Tired ass midevil fantasy setting

That is honestly just your opinion. Some of us love those settings. Loved it since we were kids. It sells cause there are people who really like that. If you don't, obviously games like this are not for you. It's not cause it's tired, it's cause it's something you don't care for.

Story focused game

I'm really really sick of people saying this like it's a bad thing. Some of us really want story in our game. We want to play a story, not just a game. A game to us is a way of taking ourselves into another world and being able to really immerse ourselves in it.

Here's something to make you gasp, story and atmosphere are what are the most important things to a game for me. For me what I love most in a game is exploration and story (why I love open world RPGs and RPGs in general).

Slightly above average graphics with a somewhat decent art style

Lolwhat?! Maybe it's not as good as the 2013 showcase but this is total hyperbole right here.

Shitty combat (they praise Assassins Creed year after year, they'll praise this too if the game itself isn't broken.)

I could see where you would get that (at least from Witcher 2 but supposedly combat here is different. And seeing as how Witcher 1 and 2 had different combat I don't think we can assume it's like AC and never changes its style). I hate target based combat honestly and I could see the link here. Hell, I'll even admit that I preferred Skyrim's combat (that I can see why people complained was bland). But I prefer combat that lets me do the aiming rather than forcing me to tell the computer which combatent I'm aiming at. Skyrim honestly felt like less button mashing (I know that will be a controversial opinion but there it is).

But, it's an RPG, combat is not the main reason I buy it. Though I admit if all RPGs had combat like Dragon's Dogma that would be awesome. But only if they kept what made them good and didn't become like Dragon's Dogma in anything else (it was very weak in a lot of stuff I like about RPGs but the combat was so good that saved it for me).
 
You should calm down, your precious game is going to get a high score on metacritic, no need to act scared like your bonus depends on whether this game does well with reviews. Most of my criticisms were based off why I think the game will do well with critics, not me pointing out that any of those things are inherently bad.....well except for the combat and the writing.

I dont really give a fuck what the metacritic is going to be, becuase Ive enjoyed the other 2 games and I know with what I saw im getting more of that.

The problem is that you are totally wrong with the bad writting, being a GoT clone, or that its basically a reskineed Assassin Creed, those are not opinions, those are things you dont really seem to undertand trying to be passed as facts.
You are basically writting all of that just to stir some people up, the last time I read something like that it was called trolling. Of course trolls will defend themselves saying is their opinion, but still making it sound like they are facts.

Truth hurts, you can't even be bother to try disagreeing with me. This game is going to get a 90 on metacritic easily.

Yeah, Im sure its ONLY your honest opinion you wanted to give there. Now I really know I made wrong trying to bother in telling you why you were wrong.

EDIT OMG You "trying" to defend what you say about comparing it to GoT.
Yeah you know absolutely nothing about The Witcher or the books.
Tales from your ass, indeed.
 
Y'all are crazy if you don't think this game is getting atleast a 90 on metacritic. It wont deserve it...but it'll get it. It's the Dark Souls 2 effect, reviewers didn't want to get claimed as "casual gamers" so they gave it high scores despite how lame it was. Dark Souls 1 didn't get that much recognition by critics because it was the first one of those games to go multiplatfrom and then later went on to be a niche breakout hit that earned mainstream recognition. This is the same thing, if you think this game is going to get low scores because of it's "hardcore" nature - you know nothing about this industry because it's actually the opposite case. There has been nothing but positive press for this game, from it's consumer friendly DLC practices to CD Projekt Rekts humble uphill climb as a "top tier" developer.

This game has everything that appeals to critics:

Generic white protagonist: Batman wannabe complex, gruff, unshaven, loner, etc.

Bad writing that people pretend/think is good like Game of Thrones (the show)

Tired ass midevil fantasy setting

Story focused game

Slightly above average graphics with a somewhat decent art style

Shitty combat (they praise Assassins Creed year after year, they'll praise this too if the game itself isn't broken.)

All of that is just off the top of my head.

I can see Polygon and Kotaku critiqueing the way sex and female characters are handled but they'll still suck on CD Projekt Rekts dick.

I hope the game is fun but it just looks like a Assassins Creed game if Ubisoft didn't annualize them and also had slightly better writing (but still shitty) and better combat (but still shitty).

EDIT: I forgot to also mention most AAA games this gen have sucked or been underwhelming so that will also play to the games favor of getting a 90+.

Wtf is "midevil"?

And holy shit at "CD Projekt Rekt".

Lmao.
 
Y'all are crazy if you don't think this game is getting atleast a 90 on metacritic. It wont deserve it...but it'll get it. It's the Dark Souls 2 effect, reviewers didn't want to get claimed as "casual gamers" so they gave it high scores despite how lame it was. Dark Souls 1 didn't get that much recognition by critics because it was the first one of those games to go multiplatfrom and then later went on to be a niche breakout hit that earned mainstream recognition. This is the same thing, if you think this game is going to get low scores because of it's "hardcore" nature - you know nothing about this industry because it's actually the opposite case. There has been nothing but positive press for this game, from it's consumer friendly DLC practices to CD Projekt Rekts humble uphill climb as a "top tier" developer.

This game has everything that appeals to critics:

Generic white protagonist: Batman wannabe complex, gruff, unshaven, loner, etc.

Bad writing that people pretend/think is good like Game of Thrones (the show)

Tired ass midevil fantasy setting

Story focused game

Slightly above average graphics with a somewhat decent art style

Shitty combat (they praise Assassins Creed year after year, they'll praise this too if the game itself isn't broken.)

All of that is just off the top of my head.

I can see Polygon and Kotaku critiqueing the way sex and female characters are handled but they'll still suck on CD Projekt Rekts dick.

I hope the game is fun but it just looks like a Assassins Creed game if Ubisoft didn't annualize them and also had slightly better writing (but still shitty) and better combat (but still shitty).

EDIT: I forgot to also mention most AAA games this gen have sucked or been underwhelming so that will also play to the games favor of getting a 90+.



dahell-black-n-whiteg9unw.gif
 
Y'all are crazy if you don't think this game is getting atleast a 90 on metacritic. It wont deserve it...but it'll get it. It's the Dark Souls 2 effect, reviewers didn't want to get claimed as "casual gamers" so they gave it high scores despite how lame it was. Dark Souls 1 didn't get that much recognition by critics because it was the first one of those games to go multiplatfrom and then later went on to be a niche breakout hit that earned mainstream recognition. This is the same thing, if you think this game is going to get low scores because of it's "hardcore" nature - you know nothing about this industry because it's actually the opposite case. There has been nothing but positive press for this game, from it's consumer friendly DLC practices to CD Projekt Rekts humble uphill climb as a "top tier" developer.

This game has everything that appeals to critics:

Generic white protagonist: Batman wannabe complex, gruff, unshaven, loner, etc.

Bad writing that people pretend/think is good like Game of Thrones (the show)

Tired ass midevil fantasy setting

Story focused game

Slightly above average graphics with a somewhat decent art style

Shitty combat (they praise Assassins Creed year after year, they'll praise this too if the game itself isn't broken.)

All of that is just off the top of my head.

I can see Polygon and Kotaku critiqueing the way sex and female characters are handled but they'll still suck on CD Projekt Rekts dick.

I hope the game is fun but it just looks like a Assassins Creed game if Ubisoft didn't annualize them and also had slightly better writing (but still shitty) and better combat (but still shitty).

EDIT: I forgot to also mention most AAA games this gen have sucked or been underwhelming so that will also play to the games favor of getting a 90+.

50centdriving.gif
 
I dont really give a fuck what the metacritic is going to be, becuase Ive enjoyed the other 2 games and I know with what I saw im getting more of that.

The problem is that you are totally wrong with the bad writting, being a GoT clone, or that its basically a reskineed Assassin Creed, those are not opinions, those are things you dont really seem to undertand trying to be passed as facts.
You are basically writting all of that just to stir some people up, the last time I read something like that it was called trolling. Of course trolls will defend themselves saying is their opinion, but still making it sound like they are facts.



Yeah, Im sure its ONLY your honest opinion you wanted to give there. Now I really know I made wrong trying to bother in telling you why you were wrong.

EDIT OMG You "trying" to defend what you say about comparing it to GoT.
Yeah you know absolutely nothing about The Witcher or the books.
Tales from your ass, indeed.

Well of course i'm just stating my opinion, I've said that earlier - im just saying my perspective on why this game will get good reviews and why I don't think it'll deserve it based on eveything I've seen and played from the previous game. Continue being an insecure fanboy, breh.
 
If I'm understanding you correctly, then, yes, this is a timely post and I agree with much of what you've written. Indeed, there's really very little debate among serious scholars that the Polish Empire's ascension to the status of a major geopolitical power in Europe represents the single greatest threat to the Westphalian order since the Cintra Incident.

Put simply, I think it's becoming increasingly clear to objective observers that a major armed conflict between the Polish Empire and her Dominions, and the major western powers, is now all but inevitable.

This is amazing response.
Now im sad that I tried to even have a conversation with him.
 
Really interested in reviews tomorrow. I wonder if we'll get some Digital Foundry action, but I assume not because only PS4 copies were sent.

The embargo lifts around 7AM PDT, right? I should be home by then to witness the birth of the Next (Probably) Fun Review Thread. If the TW3 threads of the past couple of weeks are anything to go by, the review thread is gonna be fucking hilarious.
 
The embargo lifts around 7AM PDT, right? I should be home by then to witness the birth of the Next (Probably) Fun Review Thread. If the TW3 threads of the past couple of weeks are anything to go by, the review thread is gonna be fucking hilarious.

Yeah it's a definitely going to be a highlight of my day tomorrow.

A lot of juniors will lose their lives.
 
He's obviously joking

A perfect 100 would be pretty hilarious, though. I wonder if it's something that'll happen someday. A game so fucking good even the biggest attention-seeking edgelords have to give it a ten outta ten.

the biggest attention-seeking edgelords

the biggest attention-seeking edgelords

I love this string of words :D
 
Looks like they've done a lot of performance tuning in the last 2 weeks.

hJnEf.png


I wonder if the review copies have this performance improvement patch. May be this is why they couldn't send Xbox one review copies.
 
Looks like they've done a lot of performance tuning in the last 2 weeks.

hJnEf.png


I wonder if the review copies have this performance improvement patch. May be this is why they couldn't send Xbox one review copies.

Do streamers enjoy that last 2 weeks performance increase on their discs or is it a trait for the day one patch?
 
Well of course i'm just stating my opinion, I've said that earlier - im just saying my perspective on why this game will get good reviews and why I don't think it'll deserve it based on eveything I've seen and played from the previous game. Continue being an insecure fanboy, breh.

"breh" stop acting so immature.
 
Well of course i'm just stating my opinion, I've said that earlier - im just saying my perspective on why this game will get good reviews and why I don't think it'll deserve it based on eveything I've seen and played from the previous game. Continue being an insecure fanboy, breh.

We would all take you seriously if you gave examples, but you can't.
 
Yeah, reading reviews will be fun! Media blackout outside of official trailers, although I just can't wait to hear a bit more about the structured missions of the game. So very excited to explore a massive new world, with great lore. Team Yennefer!
 
im just saying my perspective on why this game will get good reviews and why I don't think it'll deserve it based on eveything I've seen and played from the previous game.

im just saying your opinion is invalid based on everything ive seen and read from the previous page
 
Looks like they've done a lot of performance tuning in the last 2 weeks.

hJnEf.png


I wonder if the review copies have this performance improvement patch. May be this is why they couldn't send Xbox one review copies.
Nice. Assume he's talking about the day 1 patch since it went gold a while ago.
 
Sweet! Hoping for good quality Youtube videos! Or even better, high quality Gamersyde videos!

Don't count on anything from us this week, since we didn't get any review copy for any platform. All we have right now is a GOG code that will unlock at launch...
 
Attention all future developers and writers. If your protagonist is white, your character is generic.

*Many eye rolls*

It would be cool if the next Witcher let you pick to be a witcher, a magician, one of those rabid bandit guys that attacks you for no reason, or a drooling peasant.

e: whoa fast-moving thread
 
Top Bottom