The Witcher 3 runs at 1080p ULTRA ~60 fps on a 980

NoMoreTrolls said:
Alright guys, what kind of performance can I expect from an i5 4690k and a gtx 970? Would I be able to put it on Ultra 1080p capped at 30fps?
Click to expand...

pahamrick said:
I certainly hope so, as I'm hoping for ultra 1080p at 30fps on a GTX 970 and an i7 920.
Click to expand...

Yes, without a doubt. I have yet to see a benchmark where the 970 performed 30 FPS less than a 980. Ever. In fact is usually within the 5-10fps range of the 980.


No reason at all a single 970 can't do 1080p@ 30+. In fact, I would bet it does 50+ on release.
 
Cisce said:
What performance can I expect from an i5 4670k and a 2GB 7870?

I might upgrade shortly after release if my performance is too bad, but I just want to be able to play 60fps at 1920x1080 regardless of graphical settings.
Click to expand...

I would say med-high settings for around 40-50fps avg.
 
Why wouldn't a 970 do 30 FPS ultra? they are claiming a 980 run ultra at 60, and the 970 is a slightly weaker version of that, correct me if I'm wrong..

I hope to run it at ultra 60 FPS with an overclock
 
Relaxed Muscle said:
I fear my PhenomX4 3.4 and 7950HD will run the game like crap. Being an nvidia featured game and all.

Not sure if I should get the PS4 version.
Click to expand...

I am hoping that my 3570k and 7950 will do 1080/30 with no problems. The 3GB of video ram should help. And I think we will get quite a few improvements down the road with patches on PC, which may not be the case on the consoles.
 
NoMoreTrolls said:
You guys are rock stars. Thanks
Click to expand...

tumblr_mk17gghYuz1roqrz5o1_500.gif
 
Do I need to buy an overclocked 980? What is the general opinion on overclocking video cards? I've read that it decreases the life because there is more heat generation and could cause some instability depending on high how you go. I'm wondering if it's worth it or not.
 
Excuse my ignorance, but aren't i7's largely overkill for gaming? It's been a bit, but I remember that being the sentiment in the "I need a new PC!" thread(s).

I've been looking at upgrading my motherboard and processor since upgrading to the 970 and I'm looking at cost/benefit ratios lately.
 
My 970 FTW+ 2.0 awaits with bated breath.

RiccochetJ said:
Excuse my ignorance, but aren't i7's largely overkill for gaming? It's been a bit, but I remember that being the sentiment in the "I need a new PC!" thread(s).

I've been looking at upgrading my motherboard and processor since upgrading to the 970 and I'm looking at cost/benefit ratios lately.
Click to expand...

That was old advice that was solid before the news about DX12 came out. Now it's a better recommendation to get an i7 processor for sure. But an i5 won't be bad. It's just that an i7 won't be overkill anymore.
 
Gormenghast said:
I haven't watched every single one, but those I've seen stated HairWorks reduced FPS too much to be playable, on the current build.
Click to expand...

The only one that said that was Gopher, and he said it was fine UNTIL he put the Gryphon head on his horse. This cause the frame rate to dip below 60 at times when riding.
 
RiccochetJ said:
Excuse my ignorance, but aren't i7's largely overkill for gaming? It's been a bit, but I remember that being the sentiment in the "I need a new PC!" thread(s).

I've been looking at upgrading my motherboard and processor since upgrading to the 970 and I'm looking at cost/benefit ratios lately.
Click to expand...

It likely will be for a while, it's just that when DX12 hits, more cores will help in rendering tasks a lot more efficiently than they could in DX11.

With the insane per core performance of modern CPU's though, you're basically just future proofing for posisble PC exlcusive titles that heavily utilize the CPU for non 3D rendering tasks.
 
Dreams-Visions said:
That was old advice that was solid before the news about DX12 came out. Now it's a better recommendation to get an i7 processor for sure. But an i5 won't be bad. It's just that an i7 won't be overkill anymore.
Click to expand...

Kinthalis said:
It likely will be for a while, it's just that when DX12 hits, more cores will help in rendering tasks a lot more efficiently than they could in DX11.

With the insane per core performance of modern CPU's though, you're basically just future proofing for posisble PC exlcusive titles that heavily utilize the CPU for non 3D rendering tasks.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the advice! I'm going to look at i7s as a potential upgrade :)
 
Fried Food said:
Geez is a 980 already considered mid range? Seems like it should be able to do more than that.
Click to expand...

Lol, people who call a 980 "midrange" don't know what they're talking about. It's a high-end card (as opposed to an "enthusiast" card such as the 295X2 and Titan.)
 
M.D said:
Why wouldn't a 970 do 30 FPS ultra? they are claiming a 980 run ultra at 60, and the 970 is a slightly weaker version of that, correct me if I'm wrong..

I hope to run it at ultra 60 FPS with an overclock
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't it do 60? Its a pretty powerful card in its own right. I'm pretty sure the 970 will run the game a 1080p60 in ultra, maybe tweak a few settings or get a few dips here and there...It's still a high end card!
 
Guys I've got 4 Titan X running in sli on a 720p monitor. Do you think I can run this at decent settings and get 60fps?
 
I would love to play this on release, but my only option is a PC with these specs:

GeForce GTX 660
i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz
8gb RAM

Am I ok or should I wait until I get a ps4?
 
Doomshine said:
I would love to play this on release, but my only option is a PC with these specs:

GeForce GTX 660
i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz
8gb RAM

Am I ok or should I wait until I get a ps4?
Click to expand...

No way to know now. No benchmarks whatsoever since no PC review code released yet.

Your PC specs (processor wise) is way better than the PS4's, but who knows how closely optimized the PC/PS4 version is to one another.

So unless you're really itching to pre-load or something, I'd wait.
 
So how GPU-intensive is TW3 going to be? I still haven't been able to get a cooler to overclock my 4670k.

Edit: I meant CPU-intensive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Far Cry 4 now runs at 60 fps on PS5
2 3
100
960
LakeOf9 replied
Monster Hunter Wilds runs at 60 FPS on PS5 Pro, 4K30FPS or 1080P/60FPs on XSX/PS5 and 30 FPS on Xbox Series S
News 
46
8K
vkbest replied
Over 90% Players Can’t Run Final Fantasy 16 At 1080p 60 FPS
Platform  4 5 6 7 8
397
21K
Allandor replied
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle on PS5 Pro: Ray traced native 4k at 60 fps
3 4 5 6 7
308
17K
Duchess replied
Lossless Scaling allows you to play any 30/60 fps locked game with a 60/120 fps without breaking game logic
2
63
3K
evanft replied
Top Bottom