I wonder how my 970 will handle the gameworks stuff targeting 40-60 fps... hoping with a mix of high and ultra I could pull it off. guess i'll gave to wait for the performance thread to be sure
Going PS4. My poor 670 is quickly being left behind.![]()
I would just rather play at 30 lock with all dials turned on instead of hovering at 40-50. Unless of course you have a Gsync monitor.I wonder how my 970 will handle the gameworks stuff targeting 40-60 fps... hoping with a mix of high and ultra I could pull it off. guess i'll gave to wait for the performance thread to be sure
Haha k already bought and have a 570. What a waste for me it looks likeShould I even try to play this on a 670?
I was thinking of building a similar system soon. I honestly think that outside of some drastic changes in the way games utilize CPUs that system will last you for years. I've had an Intel i7 860 with 6Gb DDR3 since ~2010 and its been fine.
Guys, what is gameworks?
Also, how well can I run this? This is my first build and I'm asking for real, I'm not "sneak bragging", I know people hate that.
My rig is
i7 4790k @4.0ghz
16gb ram
PCS+ Radeon R9 290X
Guys, what is gameworks?
Also, how well can I run this? This is my first build and I'm asking for real, I'm not "sneak bragging", I know people hate that.
My rig is
i7 4790k @4.0ghz
16gb ram
PCS+ Radeon R9 290X
SLI looks perfect to me and scales at 95-99% at 4K, and only slightly lower at 1080p. AA is also working just fine with SLI.
Sweet. Is PC gaming leaned more to nvidia? Do they have the market?Gameworks is an nvidia specific library of technologies that devs can use in their games instead of building their own tech.
That's a good build, no doubt 60fps at 1080p high-ultra, especially if AMD pushes out a driver for the game.
SLI looks perfect to me and scales at 95-99% at 4K, and only slightly lower at 1080p. AA is also working just fine with SLI.
Something is wrong with your testing. 970 beats 780 easily by 10% or so out of the box. You can compare the benchmarks on guru 3D/anandtech
Sweet. Is PC gaming leaned more to nvidia? Do they have the market?
here you go.Guys, what is gameworks?
I see, thanks. Something I just noticed. People talk more about nvidia.They have the market but there is literally nothing wrong with AMD cards. GPU exclusive features are overrated anyways.
He edited in the "60 FPS" bit after my reply.
My own edit: He then changed "980" to "970".
I think he's talking about a 780Ti which usually beats the 970 by a few percent.
Skimmed through it. Looks mighty fine. I watched that video with the smoke on AC:BF. It's a lot of smoke though!
Yeah that could be the possible case.
16GB DDR4? Lol OK
Hell yes.
This sounds great.
Pardon my ignorance, but I upgraded to SLI for this game, and also my first time ever using Nvidia or dual cards period.
Does scaling 95%-99% mean a 99% increase in performance with a second card while in 4K?
SLI EVGA 970 FTWs
i7 3770k
30FPS Uber Settings+Gameworks @ 4K. Sound doable?
I see, thanks. Something I just noticed. People talk more about nvidia.
Yep, sorry. My trusty 780ti. Sold my 780 when they came out for the same price I purchased it for.
God that really makes me sad that Wild Hunt no longer uses fluid simulation/Wave Works.
Does scaling 95%-99% mean a 99% increase in performance with a second card while in 4K?
You'll essentially get almost double the performance when you go from one to two GPUs.
That of course doesn't necessarily mean double the framerate though.
^same. Here's hoping the newest nVidia drivers improves performance even more. Realistically, though I probably will end up having to turn some GFX settings to high to maintain a steady frame rate.Fuck it, going Uber settings with Gameworks on the 970. Performance be damned.
Assuming the same graphics settings, that's exactly what that means.
Running this on a 660ti and not worried in the least.
Shame the game isn't cpu intensive.
Guide me... Nvidia experience....
Assuming there are no other bottlenecks...
Guess I'll have to go with a mix of Medium and High for 780 @ 1440p
Well, yes, that's why saying it scales at 99% is meaningless unless you state the resolution and graphics settings.
So asusming we have a baseline in the settings and you're benchmarking at say 1440p both times, if you said it sees scaling of 99%, I'd assume than if one card got 30FPS at 1440p with the same settings, two are getting 60 FPS.
For every not cpu bottlenecked scene, yes. Btw, Andy says TW3 is not a cpu bound game at all.
Nobody knows this now. I bet you will be nearer to 60 than 30.
You'll essentially get almost double the performance when you go from one to two GPUs.
That of course doesn't necessarily mean double the framerate though.
I thought fluid simulation murdered performance on anything other than small scale even on the best setups?