Sword Familiar
178% of NeoGAF posters don't understand statistics
Iga is so gonna be the super-powerful hidden backer boss.
Edit:
He's already a boss though.
Edit:
He's already a boss though.
Iga is so gonna be the super-powerful hidden backer boss.
Iga is so gonna be the super-powerful hidden backer boss.
Edit:
He's already a boss though.
I refer that as the bishounen/visual kei look. Besides, who said it needs to be a man? I'd much prefer this type of look:Sure, if you ignore every Belmont that isn't Julius or Trevor walking around in a skirt
I refer that as the bishounen/visual kei look. Besides, who said it needs to be a man? I'd much prefer this type of look:
![]()
![]()
oh yes mistress i've been a bad boy
Firemind doesn't like Miriam because it's not his fetish. *noted*
Firemind doesn't like Miriam because it's not his fetish. *noted*
How do opinions work indeed.YOU think she looks like a stoner. Opinions, how do they work?
I wonder how much the game will end up with when all is said and done. $5million?
I dunno. Depends. I could see it ending in the $3-3.5M range, but it's hard to tell with these things.
Or instead I won't reward devs and publishers doing this and just forgo the game altogether.
I wonder how much the game will end up with when all is said and done. $5million?
I'm criticising your phrasing not your opinion. You can't state your opinion as fact. A good sentence would be: "I don't like the way she looks. I think she looks like a stoner."How do opinions work indeed.
Shouldn't you say : I think you cant state your opininon as fact. I think a good sentence would be ... ?I'm criticising your phrasing not your opinion. You can't state your opinion as fact. A good sentence would be: "I don't like the way she looks. I think she looks like a stoner."
For one that wouldn't be grammaticly correct, secondly: some things are subjective, some things are objective and some things are subjective but made objective by commonaly accepted rules of courteous conduct.Shouldn't you say : I think you cant state your opininon as fact. I think a good sentence would be ... ?
I think you should be more consistent!
Man, Castlevania fans will drop some serious money.
Yooka-Laylee is at $2,462,426 and has roughly double the backers.
I agree. One of my biggest problems with the last game of this type IGA worked on was that Shanoa was just another generic male character and was practically indistinguishable from the other male leads in the series. I am glad that he's decided to make this unprecedented change from OoE and the cliche issue of male metroidvania leads which has plagued the sub-genre from it's origin.
Additionally if Nintendo ever decides to make another Metriod game or if Sakamoto or Retro decide to go on their own and make a spiritual successor to the series I really hope they consider changing to a female protagonist too.
In all seriousness I like Miriam's design and think Shanoa is great. I just think the claim that the concept that a male lead in this type of title being cliche is ludicrous considering female representation in this subgenre has generally been good.
Backer average is like 70 bucksMan, Castlevania fans will drop some serious money.
Yooka-Laylee is at $2,462,426 and has roughly double the backers.
I'm criticising your phrasing not your opinion. You can't state your opinion as fact. A good sentence would be: "I don't like the way she looks. I think she looks like a stoner."
Man, Castlevania fans will drop some serious money.
Yooka-Laylee is at $2,462,426 and has roughly double the backers.
This game having a much higher entry fee is kinda interesting. I wonder how much it influences people to "pull the trigger".
Yeah. Same goes for the people who dislike it though. Lots of people just love to name drop Toru Hagihara and try to discredit Iga as much as possible. Little do they know is that SotN has been surpassed by at least 2 games ever since.People who love the igavania LOOOOOOOOOOOVE the igavania.
Yeah, the average pledge for this is $78. Pretty nuts.
This game having a much higher entry fee is kinda interesting. I wonder how much it influences people to "pull the trigger".
This is me.I've also put more money into this kickstarter than any one ever before. I don't think I'm alone, either. People who love the igavania LOOOOOOOOOOOVE the igavania.
To everyone talking about how Miriam's expressions convey her personality to you, I'd like to remind you that our last outing involved a female protagonist who literally had all the emotions torn out of her.
You have to wonder. Normally I don't have to drop $28 minimum to get a Kickstarter game. $60 just to get the tier 2 rewards.
Funding has slowed down so much. I don't see it reaching over 4 mill. I think 3.5 is more realistic. Wouldn't be surprised to see it around 3 give or take a few grand.
Big pushes have happened before though on the final day(s). So maybe we can reach a really high #?
I have to wonder if the people who complain $20 is too much for a new indie game are not actually the majority player-base. They're all over GAF, asserting what games should or should cost based purely on prerelease speculation, and there have certainly been a lot of people in this thread complaining $28 is too much for a game that hasn't even been made yet.
But we see here that the average figurative donor to Bloodstained is more than willing pay $78 for this game on faith alone. It's a weird phenomenon.
When the Red Goddess devs suggested they were going to price their game at $20, people said that was too high and it should be $15. But how can anybody actually be the judge of that? How can anybody decide the worth of a game that isn't out yet, that they haven't played, and with no idea of what it cost to develop?
I really believe that developers and publishers should decide what a game costs, not the players. I know this is somewhat anti-capitalist to say because no product is worth more than the market is willing to pay for it, but I think the market IS willing to pay $20, $30, $40, $78 dollars for games. They're just used to getting them less and complain when the price tag is higher.
But I really don't think that anybody interested in Red Goddess is going to drop the game over an extra $5. And I don't think that anybody actually passionate about playing Bloodstained is going to back off the purchase because it costs $28. Not in any sizable number, anyway.
Yeah, the retail discs are too good to pass up, especially if they're the only ones that'll ever get made.
can they just devote a huge chunk of their money to licensing the guilty gear xrd tech?
I was referring to the castlevania series. You know, the one with what, two female leads in what, 25 years?