AMD Radeon Fury X Series | HBM, Small Form Factor And Water Cooling | June 16th

I really hope the 390/390x will be HDMI 2.0 and 6GB or more. That will be fine with me. I'll definitely be upgrading from my old Titans.
 
Here's a video with an interesting discussion about the Radeon 390X. David Kanter thinks it will have 8gb HBM, and the GPU based on Tonga. He's held Fiji in his hands, and seems to be holding info back of course.

Tech Report Date: 5.15.15
 
Here's a video with an interesting discussion about the Radeon 390X. David Kanter thinks it will have 8gb HBM, and the GPU based on Tonga.

Tech Report Date: 5.15.15

I just got done watching that. The part about David having it in his hands and that 4GB not being likely is interesting.

This whole leaks and rumors show is giving me a lot of flashbacks to before the 290X launched. Most rumors indicated that it would come short of the 780/Titan while only a few showed the 290X beating those. As it turned out the "crazier" rumor was right after all. I'm still skeptical about the 390X beating the Titan X, but I'd welcome a pleasant surprise.
 
I just got done watching that. The part about David having it in his hands and that 4GB not being likely is interesting.

This whole leaks and rumors show is giving me a lot of flashbacks to before the 290X launched. Most rumors indicated that it would come short of the 780/Titan while only a few showed the 290X beating those. As it turned out the "crazier" rumor was right after all. I'm still skeptical about the 390X beating the Titan X, but I'd welcome a pleasant surprise.

Getting excited, we're almost there!

YYxAB4t.gif
 
Wow, that's really small :lol. I remember when I upgraded from a 8800GT (The GPU every GPU strives to be) to a HD5870 and was just shocked with how big it was. Had to slaughter my HDD tray to fit the thing :lol.
 
Here's a video with an interesting discussion about the Radeon 390X. David Kanter thinks it will have 8gb HBM, and the GPU based on Tonga. He's held Fiji in his hands, and seems to be holding info back of course.

Tech Report Date: 5.15.15

I'm currently watching the entire show, and they touched on many interesting things [for example, price of 14/16nm finfet wafer]. Thanks for recommending it.
 
Would it be really unlikely that this card has similar benchmark results to the Titan X and a cost of 600-700 usd? If that is the case i'm going team red next time for sure.
 
Would it be really unlikely that this card has similar benchmark results to the Titan X and a cost of 600-700 usd? If that is the case i'm going team red next time for sure.

TitanX is priced high for professional users, but Nvidia promotes it a lot for a gaming. In reality, that card costs $350 [or even less] to be produced.
 
TitanX is priced high for professional users, but Nvidia promotes it a lot for a gaming. In reality, that card costs $350 [or even less] to be produced.

If only production costs would be the sole part of a videocard cost structure...
 
Would it be really unlikely that this card has similar benchmark results to the Titan X and a cost of 600-700 usd? If that is the case i'm going team red next time for sure.

it will probably be better than a gtx 980 and cost around the same price (for a guess looking at past amd released) wether it matches a titan x remains to be seen.
 
Hopefully it delivers. Nvidia is dominating too easily these days, a kick in the arse to wake them up would be great.
 
Really hope they deliver.

What is that bar anyway? A countdown?

Also isn't the last sentence grammatically wrong?

"THE MOST ADVANCED GRAPHIC CARD IN (THE) WORLD"
 
Hopefully it delivers. Nvidia is dominating too easily these days, a kick in the arse to wake them up would be great.

They're awake. and from what I can see, they're selling their midrange cards for $500, their value midrange for $350, their high end for $1000 and their midrange "premium" cards for $700.

value = 970
mid = 980
mid premium = 980 Ti
High = Titan

(the rest of the GPUs are not worthy of gaffers. They are garbage.)


Those are some awesome margins for nVidia on mid and higher cards. Really awesome. Value and below GPUs are priced more reasonably, though still pretty high.
 
They're awake. and from what I can see, they're selling their midrange cards for $500, their value midrange for $350, their high end for $1000 and their midrange "premium" cards for $700.

value = 970
mid = 980
mid premium = 980 Ti
High = Titan

(the rest of the GPUs are not worthy of gaffers. They are garbage.)


Those are some awesome margins for nVidia on mid and higher cards. Really awesome. Value and below GPUs are priced more reasonably, though still pretty high.
Well this is in part because a couple of generations ago nVidia decided to start selling mid cards in their high bracket and introduce new 'silly' brackets on which they sell what used to be their high end cards (500-600 bracket sold for 1000)

They're unlikely to stop doing that as long as AMD continues not to bring on the heat and as long as there are people that still buy these cards.

It's a very unfortunate situation for gamers.

Edit: Also a 980Ti would be closer to a discounted High than a mid premium since they basically are stopgap cards derived from Titan.
 
Just an aside, does anybody here use RadeonPro? I have a 7950 in my rig ATM but I want to switch to NVidia for the Adaptive VSync as I absolutely can't stand screen tearing. Has anybody used the Dynamic VSync for RadeonPro, and is it any good? Cause if it is I might just reconsider and stick with AMD.
 
So....my computer died a few days ago.

Our "old" computer is doing me for the rest of the course I'm on and for a few months at the start of Uni....I'm mainly waiting for Skylake to be out but...in terms of GPU...seems like 390x might be a helluva thing to save up for/work towards.

I want to make the jump from 1080p to 2k or 4k ( the monitors seem sooo expensive though) and the boasts of 390x on 4k seem too good to be true. Also previously we had 7970s in Xfire and tbh...partly because of the games we play but also other reasons but I never felt like I saw the fruits of the labour as it were. I'd rather get a batshit insane card like the 390x than have to run stuff in SLI but I also...generally prefer Nvidia.

Which is weird because a year ago (or just under) my laptop's GPU killed itself while I was playing Borderlands and it was a 680m or something like that.

Please be good AMD.

And include regular/good driver support.
 
AMD Press Conference at Computex Taipei 2015

"AMD would like to cordially invite you to our press conference at Computex 2015. You will get the opportunity to see AMD’s latest products and leading-edge technologies, while experiencing immersive visual, computing, and gaming demonstrations. During this event, AMD executives and special guests will be introducing new, comprehensive details on AMD’s 2015 product lineup."

Date: June 3, 2015, Wednesday
Press Conference Reception: 9:30 a.m.
Press Conference: 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m
.
Venue:BELLAVITA (B1 Floor)
Address:No. 28 Song Ren Road, Xinyi District, Taipei, 110)
 
So....my computer died a few days ago.

Our "old" computer is doing me for the rest of the course I'm on and for a few months at the start of Uni....I'm mainly waiting for Skylake to be out but...in terms of GPU...seems like 390x might be a helluva thing to save up for/work towards.

I want to make the jump from 1080p to 2k or 4k ( the monitors seem sooo expensive though) and the boasts of 390x on 4k seem too good to be true. Also previously we had 7970s in Xfire and tbh...partly because of the games we play but also other reasons but I never felt like I saw the fruits of the labour as it were. I'd rather get a batshit insane card like the 390x than have to run stuff in SLI but I also...generally prefer Nvidia.

Which is weird because a year ago (or just under) my laptop's GPU killed itself while I was playing Borderlands and it was a 680m or something like that.

Please be good AMD.

And include regular/good driver support.
1080p is 2K.
 
AMD trying to ape Nvidia is going to be their fnal nail in the coffin. The market perception is such that they need to be significantly cheaper (or offer significantly better value). If it's going to trade blows and cost as much as the Titan X for one-third the frame-buffer? AMD execs smoking something.
 
If it does perform on par with (or better than) a Titan X, then that price could work -- but obviously only for 8 GB, no one is going to pay that for 4 GB.
 
$849 seems like a bad price for this card even if it outperforms the Titan X unless the difference is very significant. AMD should be trying to aggressively out-price nVidia at this point in the game imo. At $849, nVidia can, and probably will release a 980Ti to counter the small price-gap over the Titan X, and could even out-value them with such a card.

At the same time, maybe AMD is trying to get as much money as possible out of this card before the inevitable price skirmish and nVidia's next get cards in 6 months or so.
 

Still cheaper than a Titan X and very close (or perhaps even faster).

I'd say this is a good price, and no doubt lower end cards will be priced competitively as well (the 390 / 380X / 380).

Hopefully that will make Nvidia reconsider some of their GPU pricing, the 960 is way too expensive for what it is but I know market tolerance decides what is the price and not the actual specs.
 
I don't understand why some are being cynical if the price is still cheaper than nvidia's higher end GPU and perform similarly or better then AMD should be applauded. I am all open for competition to flourish and have not had an AMD piece drive my rig for the last few years but that doesn't mean that I am not interested in seeing what they offer or have closed the door on ever getting another set of GPUs from them.
 
I don't understand why some are being cynical if the price is still cheaper than nvidia's higher end GPU and perform similarly or better then AMD should be applauded. I am all open for competition to flourish and have not had an AMD piece drive my rig for the last few years but that doesn't mean that I am not interested in seeing what they offer or have closed the door on ever getting another set of GPUs from them.
I'm simply saying what the market wants. I dont want AMD to go away, trust me. But having a similarly performing card ("trade blows") with a smaller frame-buffer and AMD name doesnt instill that much confidence that people will buy this in droves.

Having said that, fudzilla is all over the place (as usual).

Fiji is 4GB
No wait, its 8GB
No it's 4GB
No it's 8GB
Much faster
Trade blows
Much cheaper
$849

I'll wait for a more trust worth source like videocardz or 3dcenter or sweclockers.
 
It'll likely blow away the Titan X in compute performance. The trade-off with Maxwell was FP64 performance. Lower power consumption partly due to removing FP64 support from the dies.

Now what I don't understand, and maybe someone more knowledgeable can answer: What does all this extra bandwidth that HBM provides actually do for us? We already know that it'll reduce power consumption, board size, but it doesn't seem like current video cards are currently bandwidth starved.
 
Top Bottom