MGSV: TPP Gets Rated For Sex, Nudity, Violence in Australia

High impact violence? Really?

e9d.jpg
 
Production Company: NOT SHOWN

So what does that exactly mean? does that mean they finished the game and there was not a single Kojima Productions logo shown to credit the CREATORS of the game??
 
Production Company: NOT SHOWN

So what does that exactly mean? does that mean they finished the game and there was not a single Kojima Productions logo shown to credit the CREATORS of the game??

Looking at the other ratings of MGS games seems like Konami just leaves that field blank

E: Nevermind MGS4 and 3 have Konami as production company
 
I think it looks decent. I'm sure it'll be justified in game, not that it needs justification.

I don't know, without any kind of reasoning, why does it exist? If the answer if cheap thrills then it losses so much credibility as a design choice.

"buy this because tits" is not good enough. It tarnishes a product in my eyes. It says to me "this game needs this to try and sell", or "confidence in the product is low because they need this irrelevant angle to a story", hence why I hope it is given context, and not just because naked person teenage fap. I'm sure most will disagree, but it irritates me in any media when this is the case.
 
I wonder what the operation scene at the end of GZ would be considered as. That was pretty graphic.

Yeah, I was just about to say this. Between cutting open people's guts to remove explosives and forcing children to rape women, I would consider Ground Zeroes high impact on violence and themes. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying they shouldn't be there (I think they fit thematicly with the game's setting and theme), but 15 year olds should not be playing it, in my opinion...

Edit: For those that didn't play it, my wording made it sound like the player is forcing kids rape women. No, no, it is the bad guys who did so (off screen, you only find out through an optional audio tape) and not the player, although the improve surgery is Snake's doing.
 
Australian ratings are so bizarre on what they allow to be sold there and what they don't sometimes @_@
 
Rated R for Redundancy, which is what the entirety of KojiPro got.
 
High impact violence? Really?

Someone mentioned it too me that there was apparently a lot of implied forced lesbian interactions. I'm sure it was all played off in that goofy boob-grabbing anime way, but apparently the rating board saw it differently.
 
I don't know, without any kind of reasoning, why does it exist? If the answer if cheap thrills then it losses so much credibility as a design choice.

"buy this because tits" is not good enough. It tarnishes a product in my eyes. It says to me "this game needs this to try and sell", or "confidence in the product is low because they need this irrelevant angle to a story", hence why I hope it is given context, and not just because naked person teenage fap. I'm sure most will disagree, but it irritates me in any media when this is the case.

I guess for me 'This is what she wants to wear' is a good enough reason.

I honestly don't care about what shes wearing. Its not her clothes or body that interest me.

I'm only really interested in her character.

I guess if I was actually thinking of a reason one could say its super hot where the story takes place and chucking on a turtle neck would be quite uncomfortable.
 
Top Bottom