Talking is fine, but when you get a narrative emerging along the lines of "sony funded game, sony is going to kickstarter, this is shameful", things have gone off the rails.
Right, but those were two separate narratives.
"Sony-funded game" came from the people who were so hyped up that they thought all their dreams were coming true and Sony was
definitely forking over dozens of millions of dollars to make their dream game.
"Sony is going to Kickstarter, this is shameful" came from people who saw the former, took it at face value (which is the stupid, unreasonable part) and went on to point out that it was pretty sleazy for that to happen (which would have been a very reasonable opinion, had it been true, but it wasn't, so fuck 'em).
Meanwhile, anyone who was going "Well hold on a second, let's find out what the fuck is
actually happening here before we declare this a good or bad development" was unceremoniously lumped into the latter category, and in the fastest-acting form of revisionist history I've ever seen, those people have now
also been blamed for spreading the
first narrative, which came from the overenthusiastic superfans to begin with.
And
all of this ultimately is on Ys Net for not getting out ahead of it in the first 24 hours and making the clarifications to the situation that we've now received. The superfans would have had to back down from their sunshine-and-rainbows narrative, the hyperreactive skeptics wouldn't have had a leg to stand on with their Chicken Little bullshit, and the people who just wanted clarity out of the situation wouldn't have had a reason to say anything, because they would have gotten it. And now that they
have provided those answers, there really isn't much of a controversy here, except that nobody can decide whose fault the previous controversy actually was, and for some reason we all seem to think that it still matters.