Your claim seems to be picking any stock on that list would give you something less volatile and at a cheaper price than Apple.
What statement would you like to prove? I was referring to the list in your link, not several pages down on the list that is on a separate page.
Pick the first stock on your link for instance. It has negative earnings per share and is paying out more in dividends than it has the cashflow for. It may be attracting uninformed investors that simply look at the dividend yield and think the dividend is sustainable.