Asia stock markets getting ravaged to open Monday

Status
Not open for further replies.
screenshot_2015-08-24q5spp.png

.
 
We dead yet?

Wonder if this is real or panic. Could be bad for presidential elections if it's this bad at market close today.

Panic. Markets have been hyping themselves up for it since Friday night. Bargain hunting starts tomorrow. U.S. Markets recover losses over next two weeks as traders hedge against Asia. Asian situation more complex. Europe at mercy of both.

Edit. Dammit. Was going to buy some stock with my employee purchase plan but it's already recovered two dollars.
 
Panic. Markets have been hyping themselves up for it since Friday night. Bargain hunting starts tomorrow. U.S. Markets recover losses over next two weeks as traders hedge against Asia. Asian situation more complex. Europe at mercy of both.

Sounds about right, Washington Post had this tidbit that related to my earlier post.

Washington Post said:
Some traders said the authorities’ failure to step in to buy shares Friday — when the market fell 4.2 percent — generated a sense of panic and forced some funds to liquidate positions. Although pension funds have reported net assets of some $550 billion, experts said they might not want to buy aggressively in a falling market.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c88a48-0161-404c-a48b-6cee7d04f864_story.html

I think it's a pretty solid argument that China made this worse by bailing them out the first time.
 
Apple is on that list at 1.97%.

And since you keep coming at me why don't you prove your statement.

Your claim seems to be picking any stock on that list would give you something less volatile and at a cheaper price than Apple.

What statement would you like to prove? I was referring to the list in your link, not several pages down on the list that is on a separate page.

Pick the first stock on your link for instance. It has negative earnings per share and is paying out more in dividends than it has the cashflow for. It may be attracting uninformed investors that simply look at the dividend yield and think the dividend is sustainable.
 
I see a rough day today based on the panic-inducing headlines of friday, but we'll probably recover slightly through the week.

I don't think anyone should be surprised that China's having issues, though. Everyone and their mother has been calling that for years.
 
what did you guys expect. corrections happen every 1.5 years where it falls 10% of gained value. we are seeing the first correction in 4 years which means the market could easily fall 25%
 
Your claim seems to be picking any stock on that list would give you something less volatile and at a cheaper price than Apple.

What statement would you like to prove? I was referring to the list in your link, not several pages down on the list that is on a separate page.

Pick the first stock on your link for instance. It has negative earnings per share and is paying out more in dividends than it has the cashflow for. It may be attracting uninformed investors that simply look at the dividend yield and think the dividend is sustainable.

Yes but my original statement was that I'm sure one can find stocks that have a higher yield and cost less. I didn't say the first stock you click on is going to be that stock.

If a person wanted to they could. Clearly you are not one of those.

I'm done with that discussion and back to the larger discussion of the markets, not Apple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom