Canadian sites are usually slower at listing XSEED games. Give it another week or two.Still not up on Amazon ca yet....
Canadian sites are usually slower at listing XSEED games. Give it another week or two.Still not up on Amazon ca yet....
Not sure if it means anything, but the date on Amazon UK changed to December 4
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0116W3L4C/
So how do you feel about Atlus now?
Pretty upset.
I dunno guys. vita or ps3?
vita - portability, headphone jack (easier access rather), slightly downgraded graphics and resolution, ever so slightly longer load times after patches.
ps3 - big screen with better graphics (on my new sony 55 tv) slightly better load times, only playable at my house.
Thinking about leaning towards vita but dunno.
I dunno guys. vita or ps3?
vita - portability, headphone jack (easier access rather), slightly downgraded graphics and resolution, ever so slightly longer load times after patches.
ps3 - big screen with better graphics (on my new sony 55 tv) slightly better load times, only playable at my house.
Thinking about leaning towards vita but dunno.
LmaoSo how do you feel about Atlus now?
I dunno guys. vita or ps3?
vita - portability, headphone jack (easier access rather), slightly downgraded graphics and resolution, ever so slightly longer load times after patches.
ps3 - big screen with better graphics (on my new sony 55 tv) slightly better load times, only playable at my house.
Thinking about leaning towards vita but dunno.
Get both.
If you can only get one them Vita.
I dunno guys. vita or ps3?
vita - portability, headphone jack (easier access rather), slightly downgraded graphics and resolution, ever so slightly longer load times after patches.
ps3 - big screen with better graphics (on my new sony 55 tv) slightly better load times, only playable at my house.
Thinking about leaning towards vita but dunno.
Really? Then why people said loading times were better on PS3? Are they that dense?PS3 loading time without SSD is way longer than the Vita's btw. Though if you have SSD, PS3 is a lot faster.
Really? Then why people said loading times were better on PS3? Are they that dense?
Well, unless I'm thinking of another game, the Vita patch was already announced like on day one or even before.Some are probably looking at comments that were made when the game first came out, before any patches were released for it. The patches helped the Vita version in regards to loading times and a few other things.
PS3 loading time without SSD is way longer than the Vita's btw. Though if you have SSD, PS3 is a lot faster.
Well, unless I'm thinking of another game, the Vita patch was already announced like on day one or even before.
That explains it then, I didn't know there were more patches after the first.The PS3 version needed the patch way more than the Vita to be honest. Day one PS3 was almost unplayable with loading times so ridiculous, same for Vita version.
The first patch made the PS3 much better while doing almost nothing to fix the Vita's and I bet most of the comments are talking about this period.
Then a loooong wait for:
The second patch fixes the Vita loading and it has become pretty fast at loading, but there are some hitches here and there in cutscenes, which are mostly absent in the PS3 version.
The last patch fixes most of the problems for both versions, so technically you should be fine whichever you pick![]()
Wait, explain this one. I am calling BS. From everything I have seen PS3 had better loading times, and no, SSDs were not involved.
I played 2 of the Gagharv games but by the third the terrible localisation was just too much to be able to enjoy it. Xseed would do a far better job but I'd take the slim possibility of them considering Ao and Zero over these every time.
I'd like Ghostlight to have had the rights to CS, Ross from Ghostlight is a huge fan of FC and it was a shame they lost out to NISA. Is there even a PC version of this game though? And why would it not be handled by NISA or Xseed themselves if there were?
I hope the Gagharv trilogy is re-released and/or retranslated at some point in the future.
I've seen this sentiment posted a lot. Couple of months ago I popped in the first game on PSP (I think the vermillion one?) and played it for about an hour and a half. I didn't notice that the translations were particularly poor though. Does it get much worse later?
PS3 loading time without SSD is way longer than the Vita's btw. Though if you have SSD, PS3 is a lot faster.
Really? Then why people said loading times were better on PS3? Are they that dense?
It's not just the bad grammar/spelling/weird mistakes, it's also that Bamco fucked with the combat systems of the games too, for the worse.
The PS3 version's loading times are in no way worse than the Vita's. I don't know where you're getting this from. The PS3 had messed up hitching in the animations at launch, but once that was patched out, it was better than the Vita version across the board.
The PS3 version's loading times are in no way worse than the Vita's. I don't know where you're getting this from. The PS3 had messed up hitching in the animations at launch, but once that was patched out, it was better than the Vita version across the board.
The PS3 version's loading times are in no way worse than the Vita's. I don't know where you're getting this from. The PS3 had messed up hitching in the animations at launch, but once that was patched out, it was better than the Vita version across the board.
I've seen this sentiment posted a lot. Couple of months ago I popped in the first game on PSP (I think the vermillion one?) and played it for about an hour and a half. I didn't notice that the translations were particularly poor though. Does it get much worse later?
I recall the translation being somewhat adequate at the very start out Vermillion. The English was pretty much correct but rather flat and characterless. Functional but bland. It seemed to degenerate as the game went on and continued to get worse with each game until they lines were all like very rough draft Google translations.
Ahhh I see.
So the release date is at Nov 17?