Is this guy who played Smash for a year the most dominant eSports player in history?

I don't think you understand how impressive 85+ tournament wins across 10+ games is.

So every single game in these Smash tournaments were 1v1? Impressive


Only the finals. I don't bother with the Smash early bracket stuff, so I asked a question. Chill

What's so impressive about that? That has always been the standard for any fighting game.

I don't get it... ._.

Because 4 players would open up a lot more chances to sneak out a win rather than 1 on 1 on a game like Smash?

But... that goes against the entire point of competitive play, right? Why would any tournament players want that?

What fighting game is not 1v1? Besides smash doubles.

I will say this, again: I wasn't sure how earlier Smash bracket matches were done, so I asked. That's it.

That's fair, I suppose. Still an odd thing to assume if you have any experience with fighting games, though...

he has a sCARf



Is this the part where we debate whether or not Smash is a "real" fighting game? This thread has to go there eventually,
My goodness... LOL

free for all competition 👀👀
 

Tomohawk

Member
This big?
xsuYvjH.png


Smash hasn't reached that high numbers compared to LoL, DotA, CS:GO, Hearthstone.



LoL has surpassed SC:BW.

Where Brood Wars was only great in South Korea, LoL is just like that, but the entire world.

I believe melee at least does comparable numbers to the CS:GO one for majors.
 
itFar from it. Especially when you take the rest of the world into consideration. Justin Wong is up tere but Korea has some of the worlds best and prominent players. They love eSports. It's a national sport.
 

Sanctuary

Member
Thread's over.

About time to broaden your horizon beyond the Western hemisphere.

It's as though Star Craft doesn't exist or something.

Flash was dominant to a point we'll never see again, but in fighting game terms ZerO is doing pretty well for himself.

Does he actually play anything other than Smash? Just because it was at EVO ($$$) doesn't make it a fighting game, no matter how hard the millenials cry for it to be. Competitive party game? Sure.
 
I hope you guys aren't using how many players play a game and equating that to the amount of skill it takes to compete at the highest level. Halo had a lot of players online during Halo 2 and the first year or two of Halo 3, but it's not like all of those players were indicative of its competitive scene.

Viewers aren't indicative either as most of them are probably scrubs.


It's hard to compare players across genres or games.
 

StayDead

Member
It's as though Star Craft doesn't exist or something.



Does he actually play anything other than Smash? Just because it was at EVO ($$$) doesn't make it a fighting game, no matter how hard the millenials cry for it to be. Competitive party game? Sure.

I lliterally cannot believe this. Smash Bros has deeper mechanics than most other modern fighting games. What's the problem with calling it a fighting game? It fits the exact literal definition of a fighting game.
 

NEO0MJ

Member
Does he actually play anything other than Smash? Just because it was at EVO ($$$) doesn't make it a fighting game, no matter how hard the millenials cry for it to be. Competitive party game? Sure.

Yeah. I mean Mario Kart made it at EVO once. No one ever considers it a fighter.

I was posting for the LoL numbers.

CS:GO's peak is also a million on Twitch.

I think the best a fighting game ever did was 230k or so.
 

Nickle

Cool Facts: Game of War has been a hit since July 2013
Let's try this again . I post sumail is the most dominant player in esports ever .
I ignore nips reign I ignore fatalitiy's run . I ignore everything to do with sc. Ignore dota1 scene wc3 scene FIFA scene and god know how much more . It's like saying wow look at this guy who won curling championships 11 times in a row isn't he the best sportsperson ever ? Smash isn't in the upper echelons of esports and even ignoring that a comparison has to be made to other esports etc etc . Just because someone is the best ever at one thing which isn't even a top competitive esport doesn't mean you can ask the question . That's why me and many others have reacted negatively .
He might not know about half of those game scenes, which is why he is asking GAF to see if there have been more dominant players in those scenes. He didn't closely examine every great player in every single e-sport since 1970 and come up with the conclusion that Zero was the greatest player of all time, that's not what this thread is about.
 

Sanctuary

Member
I lliterally cannot believe this. Smash Bros has deeper mechanics than most other modern fighting games. What's the problem with calling it a fighting game? It fits the exact literal definition of a fighting game.

How many people that actually believe this play anything other than Smash games as their "fighter"?

Sakurai says Smash Bros. isn't a fighting game, 'completely different label'. Talks game development, fighting genre and the value of unpredictability

http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2013/...nt-fighting-genre-and-value-unpredictability/
 
He might not know about half of those game scenes, which is why he is asking GAF to see if there have been more dominant players in those scenes. He didn't closely examine every great player in every single e-sport since 1970 and come up with the conclusion that Zero was the greatest player of all time, that's not what this thread is about.

Faker started competing in 2013.

E0KwJFx.gif

DEQbmyq.gif

4R23Avi.gif

hjQALb7.gif

WuAzzVk.gif
 
A vast majority of "Smash isn't a fighting game" posts always end up coming up so they can ignore the deep mechanics and skill required to be good at the game. The game's have gone so much further than what Sakurai intended. It's a different type of fighting game.
 
Congrats on the mental gymnastics required to categorise Smash Bros alongside something like 4-player Mario Bros Wii/3D World rather than, you know, any 2D fighting game.

It's primarily a platformer, and it's a 4 player party game.
So, yeah, it does fit that category. It's in the same vein as Power Stones in my mind.
 

Tomohawk

Member
I lliterally cannot believe this. Smash Bros has deeper mechanics than most other modern fighting games. What's the problem with calling it a fighting game? It fits the exact literal definition of a fighting game.

I feel like people who say smash is just a party game, have very little understanding of competitive smash's mechanic compared to other fighting games.
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
this thread makes me miss bw

sure, the competition was absolutely brutal and i bet a few kids had their lives ruined cause they couldn't make it to the top even after spending so many crucial years practicing the game

but there was nothing like it and dont think there ever will be

wish afreeca didn't lag so much for me
2BLOPSn.png

It's primarily a platformer, and it's a 4 player party game.
So, yeah, it does fit that category. It's in the same vein as Power Stones in my mind.

misc-fEEd.png
 
That's a damn impressive win streak by the guy in the OP, but didn't most of the elite Smash players either quit or stick to Melee? Almost all of the old masters stopped playing many years ago, and they had some insane skill. The Smash documentary is a good watch.
 
Smash is a fighting game and you'd have to be pretty stupid and in denial to categorize it as a party platformer

I didn't say it isn't a fighting game, but party platformer comes first in my mind.

Nintendo never built this game originally for eSports. They intended it for a bunch of young children to have fun together.
Saying it isn't a party platform is even less true than saying it isn't a 2d fighter.
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
I didn't say it isn't a fighting game, but party platformer comes first in my mind.

Nintendo never built this game originally for eSports. They intended it for a bunch of young children to have fun together.
Saying it isn't a party platform is even less true than saying it isn't a 2d fighter.
Being ignorant to Smash's high level fighting mechanics this much...
cm-vi2.gif
 

Nickle

Cool Facts: Game of War has been a hit since July 2013
Reread the thread title.
"Zero is the most dominant eSports player in history"
"Is Zero the most dominant eSports player in history?"

Those two sentences don't mean the same thing.

And I still don't think you've watched a single set of competitive Smash. Watch a random set like this and tell me that Smash is just a party game.
 

Maztorre

Member
It's primarily a platformer, and it's a 4 player party game.
So, yeah, it does fit that category. It's in the same vein as Power Stones in my mind.

It's primarily a fighting game (as is Power Stone), seeing as the primary goal is defeating Human/CPU opponents using a suite of melee/ranged combat moves. How is it primarily a platformer when 99% of how the game is played has little to do with platforming?

I didn't say it isn't a fighting game, but party platformer comes first in my mind.

Nintendo never built this game originally for eSports. They intended it for a bunch of young children to have fun together.
Saying it isn't a party platform is even less true than saying it isn't a 2d fighter.

Capcom did not build Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo for "esports", but here we are.
 

Nibel

Member
55 tournaments with who knows who played, a game that doesn't have that many A-tier players to begin with since Melee is more popular

Nope, he isn't

Title change is appreciated sank you
 
Being ignorant to Smash's high level fighting mechanics this much...
cm-vi2.gif

I'm not ignorant to the HIGHER fighting mechanics in other fighting games, and EVEN HIGHER skill mechanics in other genres.

If you want to praise Smash, more power to you. I'll watch something more interesting.

It's primarily a fighting game (as is Power Stone), seeing as the primary goal is defeating Human/CPU opponents using a suite of melee/ranged combat moves. How is it primarily a platformer when 99% of how the game is played has little to do with platforming?

Uh have you played Smash? Are you not jumping platform to platform?

The whole goal of the game is to stay on the platforms.
 

Tomohawk

Member
The conversation of whether smash is a fighting game or a party game is a completely pointless one. What matter is how the players approach the game, and what they do with tools their given. I wouldn't say how smash players approach their game and traditional fighting game players approach theirs is not that far off.
 

Toxi

Banned
people still bitching about whether Smash is a fighter as it continues to get higher attendance at fighting game tournaments than most "actual" fighting games.

You're fighting a losing battle.
 
Top Bottom