I was going to get this game on the PC but entirely skipping it now with that remark.
This is gold.
I was going to get this game on the PC but entirely skipping it now with that remark.
The meaning to me is we're pushing ps4 as hard as possible please buy it if you wanna play our games.Only in the dumbest interpretation, he's clearly saying he wants PS3 to be an aspirational item, something a person desires and will do all they can to own one. Not 'lol, can't afford it? Try working harder, scrubs!'
Ono was asked what do you have to say to SF fans on XB1. He said, you'll have to buy a PS4... nothing false, nothing underhanded, or misleading, nothing else to say really. I mean, what do you want him to say?
I think his comments came off kinda trololololo-ish, and a lot of X1 only owners are already pissed about SFV exclusivity, so the tone of that answer kinda stings. I guess if he had said the usual platitudes and PR speak of valuing those consumers and hoping they can be apart of this game's community, people wouldn't be as upset.
Personally, Ono seems like a silly guy trying to be funny. Don't get the vibe he meant it as a sick burn at all.
Haha. Come on, folks. Ono's one of the most light hearted dudes in the industry. Some people are taking some throwaway comments to silly questions way too personally.
I think his comments came off kinda trololololo-ish, and a lot of X1 only owners are already pissed about SFV exclusivity, so the tone of that answer kinda stings. I guess if he had said the usual platitudes and PR speak of valuing those consumers and hoping they can be apart of this game's community, people wouldn't be as upset.
Personally, Ono seems like a silly guy trying to be funny. Don't get the vibe he meant it as a sick burn at all.
I think his comments came off kinda trololololo-ish, and a lot of X1 only owners are already pissed about SFV exclusivity, so the tone of that answer kinda stings. I guess if he had said the usual platitudes and PR speak of valuing those consumers and hoping they can be apart of this game's community, people wouldn't be as upset.
Personally, Ono seems like a silly guy trying to be funny. Don't get the vibe he meant it as a sick burn at all.
Why would X1 owners even want SF5 when they have Killer Instinct?
I think his comments came off kinda trololololo-ish, and a lot of X1 only owners are already pissed about SFV exclusivity, so the tone of that answer kinda stings. I guess if he had said the usual platitudes and PR speak of valuing those consumers and hoping they can be apart of this game's community, people wouldn't be as upset.
Personally, Ono seems like a silly guy trying to be funny. Don't get the vibe he meant it as a sick burn at all.
The Sony fanboys are rabid in this topic. Never seen a more hypocritical group of fanboys. And this site is supposed to have standards. LOL
The Sony fanboys are rabid in this topic. Never seen a more hypocritical group of fanboys. And this site is supposed to have standards. LOL
The gift that keeps giving.It's delicious
![]()
The Sony fanboys are rabid in this topic. Never seen a more hypocritical group of fanboys. And this site is supposed to have standards. LOL
[Laughs] x2The Sony fanboys are rabid in this topic. Never seen a more hypocritical group of fanboys. And this site is supposed to have standards. LOL
The Sony fanboys are rabid in this topic. Never seen a more hypocritical group of fanboys. And this site is supposed to have standards. LOL
Why would X1 owners even want SF5 when they have Killer Instinct?
It doesn't bother me at all but if anybody from square Enix or crystal dynamics said this (or even if the roles were just reversed) then I believe this thread would be a magnitude of pages larger![]()
The Sony fanboys are rabid in this topic. Never seen a more hypocritical group of fanboys. And this site is supposed to have standards. LOL
It doesn't bother me at all but if anybody from square Enix or crystal dynamics said this (or even if the roles were just reversed) then I believe this thread would be a magnitude of pages larger
It's sort of like, "hey it doesn't affect me, what do I care? It's funny!"
It doesn't bother me at all but if anybody from square Enix or crystal dynamics said this (or even if the roles were just reversed) then I believe this thread would be a magnitude of pages larger
It's sort of like, "hey it doesn't affect me, what do I care? It's funny!"
The idea of earned extra content sounds perfect, but there is a lot of skepticism about it among my friends due to Capcom's super hyper ultra edition track record. If they deliver on that promise, then I think this game could have great legs as fence sitters opt to jump in after realizing they don't need to wait for a better edition.
Has anyone else felt or encountered such resistance regarding this policy?
Oh gosh there's so much irony in this post.The Sony fanboys are rabid in this topic. Never seen a more hypocritical group of fanboys. And this site is supposed to have standards. LOL
Honestly comments like this are probably the reason Ono is laughing at people.
Yeah, I really doubt we're getting another Capcom Fighter this gen. Maybe Marvel if they can get a deal going but I doubt they'd go for anything else due to risk and cutting the user base.
If I were in his shoes I'd say that question has been answered and left it at that.
I kind of doubt it. Arika hasn't used any of those characters in ages, I don't think Capcom has bothered. Karin is owned by the mangaka who created her and he said they could get her if they wanted but they still waited ages despite demand.
Ex characters probably haven't gotten as much demand, but to be fair I kind of doubt any of the polls included them either.
Donnow what's worst, the people who are taking way too seriously how Ono answered the question not clearly knowing the dude and how he usually is/acts, or the aggressive/childish responses to said people
Fuckin shitshow of a thread
It doesn't bother me at all but if anybody from square Enix or crystal dynamics said this (or even if the roles were just reversed) then I believe this thread would be a magnitude of pages larger
It's sort of like, "hey it doesn't affect me, what do I care? It's funny!"
Why should he be laughing? Capcom have a whole history of changing their minds.
Smh at people getting mad because Ono gave a straight no BS answer. I prefer that a million times rather than an answer that leaves room for doubts.
Also, I look forward to the day we'll be able to open a thread about either SFV or RotTB and not mention the other at all. It's getting tiring.
It doesn't bother me at all but if anybody from square Enix or crystal dynamics said this (or even if the roles were just reversed) then I believe this thread would be a magnitude of pages larger
It's sort of like, "hey it doesn't affect me, what do I care? It's funny!"
Some people are actually mad at Ono?
He's a troll, an amazing one.
I was going to get this game on the PC but entirely skipping it now with that remark.
Do you not know Ono?
It's the former. This is the guy they're going after.
![]()
It doesn't bother me at all but if anybody from square Enix or crystal dynamics said this (or even if the roles were just reversed) then I believe this thread would be a magnitude of pages larger
It's sort of like, "hey it doesn't affect me, what do I care? It's funny!"
I wish a Sqeenix dev would have said the same about ROTR.
It would have been pandemonium in these parts.