family_guy
Member
What's wrong with crayons?
Very few jobs for colorists. Best to stop that behavior early.
What's wrong with crayons?
Very few jobs for colorists. Best to stop that behavior early.
I know you guys are all mostly men and that's the core emotional reason you feel slighted by this story, despite the attempts at empirical logic and rational objective reasoning.
That said, I also know what this teacher did is an overreaction. It'd be like seeing the pink and purple girls aisle in a toys r us, with the brooms and the ovens and makeup and shit, and banning boys from the store because of it.
Yeah, I think this is one of the cases where one should just let girls have equal time, not more time. That said, you guys KNOW men need a handicap, right? You understand that equality will never be a reality if we don't voluntarily sacrifice our own overwhelming dominance in certain instances, right?
I guess what I'm saying is don't let this one teacher's misjudgement color your perception of the whole issue going forward.
Boys need the handicap.
Look at our patriarchy. What don't you understand? In order for the world to actually have gender equality, us men have to voluntarily take a hit in certain places. We'll live.
I do, however, agree with this for the most part. Poor execution.
It's a safe bet most of those boys are packed up with Lego at home and the girls aren't, seems like a well-intentioned but ultimately misguided attempt to address that imbalance and the teacher has my support.
OK, this post is just you excusing and justifying your own vitriol by presuming things about the way I debate outside of this thread and criticizing my (obviously) flawed writing techniques, rather than giving me measured reasons for why I should think the way you do. I've misused the term "ad hominem" in the past, but I think(?) that's close to what your posts amount to.
Yeah, and I think a lot of people might take what I wrote to mean I don't fully understand that boys are having trouble in school right now when compared to girls. But those boys are still growing up to a world where they're paid more, allowed to do whatever they want with their bodies, and become marginalized in several areas, especially globally.
I don't want to stop supporting human beings. I'm just saying that some girls work twice as hard for half as much payoff after their education.
Where I'm from the plural is definitely Legos. Is there official branded literature on this or is this a cultural thing? Googled it and, well, there's a silly rabbit hole that could be entertaining but it seems like the s plural is safe and actually more widely used (in America at least) and that the company doesn't want the toys referred to as Lego or Legos, for whatever reason.Also the plural of Lego is Lego. Come on OP.
Where I'm from the plural is definitely Legos. Is there official branded literature on this or is this a cultural thing? Googled it and, well, there's a silly rabbit hole that could be entertaining but it seems like the s plural is safe and actually more widely used.
Just got a late edit in but... that's not what that says. They say there is no plural for Lego because that is the company name. The plural for Lego brick is Lego bricks, but they really can't control that people have pulled a Kleenex and Band-Aid with the product.Lego company itself states that the plural of Lego is Lego.
![]()
What? Dude, take the derivative of the function. Women are already increasing in advantage in every single level of education, and they're already above men all the way through the graduate level. How does stunting boy's growth in kindergarten improve educational equality in any way?
And the rest of those things have nothing to do with education whatsoever. We should prevent boys from playing with Legos because globally, women don't have control over their bodies? What? Are you just a random word generator?
No, just an apparently misguided crusader too naive to wait for things to change on their own over time
You know the type
For the record, we sure are focusing on the kindergarten aspect (I guess because this is the thread we're having the discussion), but I've already said I don't agree with the teacher in this scenario. Don't ban boys from the toy store. I just reject the notion that she was a total nincompoop and didn't have her heart in the right place, etc.
I just reject the notion that she was a total nincompoop and didn't have her heart in the right place, etc.
Just got a late edit in but... that's not what that says. They say there is no plural for Lego because that is the company name. The plural for Lego brick is Lego bricks, but they really can't control that people have pulled a Kleenex and Band-Aid with the product.
Alright, I think we should tone it down... My last post was maybe a bit too snarky. You don't have to respond to this post if you don't want to, I'm sure you'll have lots to respond to that's more on-topic. I used a mild pejorative because, yeah, I had an emotional reaction to your post. I wouldn't consider my language vitriolic, though. Lots of other people are giving those measured reasons, I was just pointing out how arguments like "You guys KNOW I'm right, right?" aren't arguments at all. You've reached a conclusion without constructing an argument first, thus begging the question. It's not a great way to start, especially if you're saying something controversial.
'You’re going to have a turn’ — and I’m like, ‘Yeah, when hell freezes over’
This is a series of thoughts she had towards children in Kindergarten. Her heart is not in the right place.
When she's lying and saying in her head "when hell freezes over," I can't agree that her heart is in the right place.
No, just an apparently misguided crusader too naive to wait for things to change on their own over time
You know the type
For the record, we sure are focusing on the kindergarten aspect (I guess because this is the thread we're having the discussion), but I've already said I don't agree with the teacher in this scenario. Don't ban boys from the toy store. I just reject the notion that she was a total nincompoop and didn't have her heart in the right place, etc.
Both ways are wrong. And yet, they're called Legos where I'm from and it is a non-issue. Knowing Band-Aid was a brand name since forever never made me start asking for a Band-Aid brand adhesive bandage. Just a piece of curiosity. You'd think the companies would be proud to have their names appropriated into the language. Probably something legal with them not being able to claim responsibility over corruptions.Regardless, "Legos" is just plain wrong. Other people may be uninformed, but you no longer are.
I'm not gonna join the pile on, I'm just gonna pose the question of who the fuck determined purple is a girl's colour? Fuck y'all. I rock the purple and it rocks me. We rock it hard together, so step off!
Lego company itself states that the plural of Lego is Lego.
![]()
'You’re going to have a turn’ — and I’m like, ‘Yeah, when hell freezes over’
This is a series of thoughts she had towards children in Kindergarten. Her heart is not in the right place.
I'm not gonna join the pile on, I'm just gonna pose the question of who the fuck determined purple is a girl's colour? Fuck y'all. I rock the purple and it rocks me. We rock it hard together, so step off!
I've always seen purple as a gender neutral color, it just happens to go nicely with pink.
I rock black and pink Nike shoes all the damn time.
I'm not of the believe boys and girls would 100% be the same if we removed gender roles and conventions from the equation, but colours being divided by gender is a pretty stupid societal norm I'm glad society has been gradually moving away from.
Both ways are wrong. And yet, they're called Legos where I'm from and it is a non-issue. Knowing Band-Aid was a brand name since forever never made me start asking for a Band-Aid brand adhesive bandage. Just a piece of curiosity. You'd think the companies would be proud to have their names appropriated into the language. Probably something legal with them not being able to claim responsibility over corruptions.
Anyway, on topic, that teacher is an idiot and the idea that anyone needs to be held back for the sake of progress strikes me as ludicrous, especially so when you're referring to children.
I wore neon pink all the time in the 90's. What happened?![]()
I'm not gonna join the pile on, I'm just gonna pose the question of who the fuck determined purple is a girl's colour? Fuck y'all. I rock the purple and it rocks me. We rock it hard together, so step off!
You are my personal hero and I will follow you to the depths of hell and back for this.
Lol @ the avatar edit
I the right ideology.
What does this sentence mean?
I rock black and pink Nike shoes all the damn time.
I'm not of the belief boys and girls would 100% be the same if we removed gender roles and conventions from the equation, but colours being divided by gender is a pretty stupid societal norm I'm glad society has been gradually moving away from.
You are my personal hero and I will follow you to the depths of hell and back for this.
No, just an apparently misguided crusader too naive to wait for things to change on their own over time
You know the type
For the record, we sure are focusing on the kindergarten aspect (I guess because this is the thread we're having the discussion), but I've already said I don't agree with the teacher in this scenario. Don't ban boys from the toy store. I just reject the notion that she was a total nincompoop and didn't have her heart in the right place, etc.
Something something good intentions.
Give it time.Seems like literally no-one agrees with this teacher.
Don't get me wrong-- if we can reach gender equality without handicapping one gender over another, I'll be psyched.
Seems like literally no-one agrees with this teacher.
Opps.. lost an N somewhere
This is the only way it will happen without some kind of total societal collapse that resets everything.
You agree with her ideology that it's good to hold one group of children back if it's in the name of pursuing equality?