Is this overall Game of the Year or Game of the Year at Sub 30 FPS?
Oh so you haven't played it then huhI could be really snarky here and say that a "game" that chugs along at 15fps half the time doesn't deserve anything.
Hilarious considering your icon's game's remaster couldn't even manage 60fpsZurick said:Is this overall Game of the Year or Game of the Year at Sub 30 FPS?
If we add this to the total list, it finally overtakes MGS5.
![]()
Miss Colombia
EDIT: Congratulation From Software and thank you Jun Ito for all your hard work. Bloodborne is Destructoid's game of the year.
If the game didn't dip down to 0 FPS, I'd feel good about this.
Seems it was the right attitude to not visit Destructoid and this ain't changing that.
Although I respect their opinion.
I could be really snarky here and say that a "game" that chugs along at 15fps half the time doesn't deserve anything.
Or the fucked up frame pacing. Whatever. (The framerate totally drops with multiple players.with 3 players was not fun. )Ludwig
Sure. If you consider one small area with half a dozen quests "large portions".
If you want pure gameplay, play Splatoon.
Is this overall Game of the Year or Game of the Year at Sub 30 FPS?
B-b-but...Destructoid knows what's up. Well deserved.
No it means you're too sensitive and should probably stick to PC gaming exclusively. The game ran better than Dark Souls 1 by miles and was overall fine. If 30fps is enough to stop playing a game I don't know what to tell you.I could only play the game for 2,5 hours before the 30fps and frame pacing issues got too much for me, does this also mean I'm salty?
No it means you're too sensitive and should probably stick to PC gaming exclusively. The game ran better than Dark Souls 1 by miles and was overall fine. If 30fps is enough to stop playing a game I don't know what to tell you.
LolWhat? I wasn't even referring to Bloodborne. It was a reply to someone's post about how The Witcher 3 runs 20fps. At least read the post before jumping in with your childish gifs.
Lol
I read your post, and before patches the witcher 3 was pretty poor on ps4
And I like the gif because people get needlessly defensive such as this
Do I sound as riled up as you do right now thoYou're the one mass quoting people and posting juvenile salt gifs. Sure, I'm defensive.
Do I sound as riled up as you do right now tho
I think you need to learn how to analyze tone in writingYou sure did when you mass quoted a bunch of troll comments.
I think you need to learn how to analyze tone in writing
This is my GOTY. Here is to hoping to BB2.
Hoping for a trilogy tbh. It's a great IP, and I really hope it doesn't go out the way of Demon's Souls.
no trilogy according to Verendus, but i really hope that the sequel is in those 2 new From's exclusive games
From 2011:
But he was saving that gif for that thread where BB won GOTY, it has to be used.What? I wasn't even referring to Bloodborne. It was a reply to someone's post about how The Witcher 3 runs 20fps. At least read the post before jumping in with your childish gifs.
But he was saving that gif for that thread where BB won GOTY, it has to be used.
I say that as someone who spent hundreds of hours on Demon's Souls and Dark Souls, and almost as much (but not quite) with Dark Souls 2. Bloodborne just felt very underwhelming and half-baked compared to those games. And despite the cries of "It's a different game, and not comparable!", it still firmly sits under the "Souls" umbrella. Bloodborne's lack of options (vanilla), extremely small world and almost just as bad hitboxes in some cases as Dark Souls 2 actually made me appreciate Dark Souls 2 more; something I thought not possible.
I still really enjoyed it, it just didn't have the replayability of the previous Miyazaki (and his disciple) games and wasn't as satisfying for me, even though it had excellent combat. Also, it seems like you didn't finish reading the rest of my post or something, or maybe didn't really get my point.
Anyone here play/beat/enjoy Bloodborne but find it undeserving of GOTY?
I guess I need to pick it up eventually, but having never been interested in Demons Souls or Dark Souls it's always been a $20-or-less buy for me.
![]()
Miss Colombia
EDIT: Congratulation From Software and thank you Jun Ito for all your hard work. Bloodborne is Destructoid's game of the year.
Lol, even when Bloodborne wins something, some of its fans are still salty as fuck instead of celebrating in a fun manner.
Congrats to From Software, you deserved some GOTYs, but not some of this pitiful fans*
*Not all of them, you know who you are by reading this thread.
B-b-but...
![]()
You are correct of course
I'm playing scholar of the first sin of DS2 right now (I only played vanilla DS2 when it came out), & it's actually worse than I remembered, very very poor mechanical decisions, you couldn't even aim your roll attack (you could in all other games), which is very frustrating for dex builds.
I see Dark Souls 2 as a huge missed opportunity, in terms of content it shits on Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, & Bloodborne, but it's very clunky mechanically because of adaptability, poor balancing (entire weapon classes were useless), & the aforementioned inability to aim roll attacks, halberds & scythes have absurdly small "sweet spot" hitboxes as well (I don't know why they changed that from Dark Souls).
I won't get into the lore & art direction part since that's subjective, but in term of content, it completely destroys the other games, but the "game" part is not even close, the other three games play so much better.
Different people like different Souls games (I'm a DeS person myself), but Dark Souls 2 is mechanically inferior to all the other three games (still better than 99% of games out there, sadly), so I can't agree with you there at all.
EDIT: And it looks like Dark Souls 3 will play like a hybrid of Dark Souls & Bloodborne with the combat speed of Demon's Souls, & with hopefully as much content as Dark Souls 2.