Is the price of this expected to be low just because it's related to gaming? Think about how insane the $500 price tag of the ipad seemed at the time
It's material nonpublic information.
Because that affects share prices and even if you were planning to based on success, you wouldn't announce it until they slowed down so you can announce the biggest number possible.
When there are is a publicly traded company involved usually you don't spontaneously release numbers.
Not buying one?![]()
I'm not sure where all the doom is coming from in this thread. Company starts selling product for X price, tons of people are buying the product at X price, NeoGAF: "Wow this company is fucking doomed"
Hahaha wow! Oh the schadenfreude. No way in hell this sees mass market adoption with a price that high. You even need to pay out the ass for a computer to run the damn thing on top of this?!?! What the hell were they thinking? Yikes.
You don't need a $1000-1500 computer with specific parts to use an iPad for two fucking games.
You want to put a bet on that?
Would stake money on it not costing that much, will launch at a price similar to the PS4.
399.
They already gave that clue, that it would cost around the same as a system.
The PS3 has sold more than the Wii.
Doesn't matter what they say, PS3 was sold out for a while too but it's no Wii.
Smartphones can make calls, surf the Internet, use apps without extra hardware. I can't use my Oculus Rift to get an Uber when I'm stumbling drunk out of a bar.
And so it begins.
I just don't get why the reaction is this huge. It may be more expensive than you thought but there has been almost no news stating anything other than VR is going to cost you a lot. I can only imagine the reaction if people weren't out there saying how VR was going to be expensive.
$120 - Shipping
lol, what are they shipping you? A rock?That seems reasonable
Yeah. I think the PS3 was $650 before tax at the time? Maybe $699?
Psvr isn't for pc, so lol to thatSony is our only hope for bringing VR to the masses. THere was a no doubt that Oculus was going to be expensive.
Don't. Fail. Sony.
1) Sony have experience in manufacturing and general supply chain management, vs likely very limited experience between oculus and Facebook.
2) cheaper to have a single panel vs two on the OR.
3) entry level PSVR could be headset only which saves money on the camera and controller (could be $100 saving right there)
I could see PSVR being $399 headset-only, but it might not be easy for them to go much cheaper, assuming OR is selling at or near cost.
Vive conversely :
1) two tracking lighthouses vs one webcam
2) two motion controllers vs one non-motion controller in OR
3) HTC aren't in this as a charity and have no platform to push unlike Oculus/Facebook or Sony.
I could see Vive being $1-200 more than OR
A couple months ago, Apple released another IPad for $600+ and everyone rushed to the Apple Store.
Companies releasing pre-order numbers all the time. This is like not even trying.
Right? $600 for a new hot tech item isn't really high at all.
Why? Because Oculus said that it will cost around the same as DK2. And because the differences between DK2 and CV1 are pretty small. Basically just better screen and some design differences.
What are you smoking?The PS3 has sold more than the Wii.
I nailed it in the price prediction thread yesterday
My other predictions were PSVR $399 and Vive $799
lol, what are they shipping you? A rock?
Smartphones can make calls, surf the Internet, use apps without extra hardware. I can't use my Oculus Rift to get an Uber when I'm stumbling drunk out of a bar.
If Apple made a vr solution I'd pay $600![]()
600 by itself, but add on a recommended 970 and the price just went up substantially
We don't even know what PSVR will cost. Don't even mention the PS4 on top.
Well it is a new and evolving technology. Just like most electronics they start off rudimentary and evolve as the technology allows it. Usually both getting better and cheaper, look at mobile phones for a recent example. When first introduced they were expensive and impractical and only used in a niche market. Now not so much.But VR seems to still be in a nebulous place. No uniform control mechanism. Things like eye-tracking coming into the picture recently.
If I bought a BluRay player as they came out it pretty much does what a BluRay player will do down the line, just clunkier. With VR I get the impression that an Oculus Rift CV2 will have a killer new feature than invalidates the last, more like an iPhone than a BluRay player.
You only build a product around licensing fees if you think the market is large enough that the number of games sold and their respective licensing fees make up for the difference.
This isn't a console model. The market is way too small. Don't even try and argue that there is a massive market here. Kinect sold ~25M at it was at a much lower price point than this. I don't see anyone expecting VR to sell 25M on the PS4.
I think if they sell 1-2M of them, they will be absolutely ecstatic.
Sure. But for the early adopter niche? This isn't that bad. This isn't meant to be mass market out the gate.
What are you smoking?
The sarcasm makes him sound super mad at the backlash
If Sony can eek out a $299 PSVR then I will be pleasantly surprised.
Apples to Oranges