Xbox One at 18 million (activated units)

Please don't refer to it as "xbone". If you were being sincere you would say X1, XB1 or Xbox One. A game console deserves more respect than that.

Pretty sure that person is being sincere. Xbone seems to be a pretty accepted way to say the console at this point. Anyone still reading it as "X-bone" and sniggering at their sick burn is a child.

Regardless though, these are consoles. Inanimate objects. None of them "deserve respect."
 
I did get it, it's the best controller I have ever held in my hands. By a long shot.

MS took a $1BN hit on the 360 red ring of death issues. In 2016 dollars, they could probably take a 2-3BN hit on the xbox one and do an xbox 1.5 with 2-3 times the gfx power for a $100 trade in. That would be a game changer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n5E7feJHw0

GAF, once again showing why they will never be the heads of multinational corporations.
 
Not that far behind?

2:1 is a huge advantage.

Xbox is the way behind to the point it's not even a competition.

Having 1/3 of the market in any other multi billion dollar industry would be considered very successful, I'm not sure why this is any different.
 
Not that far behind?

2:1 is a huge advantage.

Xbox is the way behind to the point it's not even a competition.

2:1 is a huge advantage, that that does continue to generate its own momentum, but it's going too far to say they aren't in competition.

What will be interesting is to see whether PSVR starts to shift focus or evolve the PS4 console so as to make it seem like it's a totally different experience that the Xbox. If that happens, they may well start to see diverging audiences. (I don't personally see that happening, but the next year will be interesting to see.)
 
Please don't refer to it as "xbone". If you were being sincere you would say X1, XB1 or Xbox One. A game console deserves more respect than that.

I usually only use "Xbox One", feel free to check my post history.

But, for the purposes of this thread, I will make certain to call it the Xbone whenever I refer to it.

And no, the Xbone does not deserve respect. It's a plastic box sitting under my TV.
 
Please don't refer to it as "xbone". If you were being sincere you would say X1, XB1 or Xbox One. A game console deserves more respect than that.

(not sure if serious but...) even xbone owners refer to it as xbone. at this point, getting upset over xbone says more about you than the people using it.
 
Amazing how the thread title says 18m but at this point people in the thread people are saying 20m lol.

come back tomorrow and the bone will be market leader!

MS took a $1BN hit on the 360 red ring of death issues. In 2016 dollars, they could probably take a 2-3BN hit on the xbox one and do an xbox 1.5 with 2-3 times the gfx power for a $100 trade in. That would be a game changer.

MS could take that hit yeah, but the xbox division (now devices?) likely could not. It also likely would not be worth it for the overarching company to throw even more into that sinkhole.
 
Having 1/3 of the market in any other multi billion dollar industry would be considered very successful, I'm not sure why this is any different.
But they don't have 1/3 of the market. They are not even at 30%.
But even if they did have, it's not much of an accomplishment when there are only 3 companies competing
 
But they don't have 1/3 of the market. They are not even at 30%.
But even if they did have, it's not much of an accomplishment when there are only 3 companies competing

I was doing 36 + 18 = 54M. 18 / 54M = 0.33 (1/3). Not counting wii-u.
 
2:1 is a huge advantage, that that does continue to generate its own momentum, but it's going too far to say they aren't in competition.

What will be interesting is to see whether PSVR starts to shift focus or evolve the PS4 console so as to make it seem like it's a totally different experience that the Xbox.

There is no competition from MS, they are a regional competitor at best, especially this gen.

Their main rival has twice the market share, a global brand and all the momentum.

It is the Xbox that needs to differentiate itself from the PS4, as the market stands it is what the PS4 is and does that the market wants, the X1 is the weaker, less desirable of the two.
 
How many peeps have xboxes in closets waiting for scaledown?
Wait, I don't unde--

Freudian slip??
Oh snap! Lol

Well just after E3 and pre orders opened, Microsoft must have seen the numbers coming through and would have been well aware of what Sony were doing and behind the scenes' Mattrick would have been doing his best Private Frazer from Dads Army impression.

They were fucked. The brand was toxic. The guy in charge lost his job. I bet they might have thought this was it, they've lost the gamers and they could be out of the industry.

Of course its getting spanked by the PS4 but the Xbox could easily be as dead as a dodo this gen and still not have broken through the 10 million barrier yet.

If there on 18 or thereabouts now you'd imagine come the end of this gen theyll be somewhere near 40-50 million. Theyll count themselves lucky, pat themselves on the back for the changes they made and take a solemn vow never to make the same mistakes again.

Just my 2cents on it though :)
If the Wii U can break 10 million, XBO can easily do so. And don't forget MS has the money to see it through; even OG Xbox took 2nd in its gen and that had none of the advantages XBO has.

My (and others) questioning is in this implication XBO sell-through is higher than 18 million, b/c like Chobel said that'd mean momentum is coming from non-US/UK markets, and we all know how poorly it's been doing in those places. And considering it was flat this Nov vs. last in NA, I don't see it having surged crazily in December.

Another poster said it was around 15 million as of the end of November. If that's true, and assuming it did the same in December in NA that it did for November and, let's say, peg UK at around a million (that's probably too high), how does the ROTW account for the other 500k?
 
Yes, I think it would have mattered if it was.

The point isn't winning, it's shifting the needle enough. There is time dependence, there is entrenchment. But just the Xbox 360 "unentrenched" Sony in the US and UK from the PS2 era and the PS4 is doing the same years later.

By the same token, I could say Microsoft made many mistakes, launched at a higher price, and is still only around a million units behind in the US. The matter is what needs to be done to move the needle, and they did essentially nothing for the european market, save for a couple of bundles and limp-wristed exclusivity agreements. The message from the reveal was loud and clear: It was an american device, tailored to America, so we shouldn't be surprised that it lost even more market share outside of the UK that it had before.

I just simply don't think it would have mattered. They made solid effort with trying with the 360 during a time in which the PS3 had a lot of negativity and it still didn't matter.

Sony came out stronger this gen vs. last gen and the Xbox brand didn't have a one year head start this time.

The Xbox brand has gained popularity since 2005 but on the flip side, it really only did so in the territoires in which the Xbox One is currently doing solid in.

The way I feel about this is similar to how I feel when I see people making statements about Nintendo making a "major comeback" if the NX is powerful and has third party support. The general audience is simply too locked into thinking the Xbox and PlayStation brands are the appropriate places to play core games due to more than a decade of solid support for that type of gaming and acceptable online play. It would take Nintendo many years plus some really silly mistakes from Xbox and PlayStation for them to be in the spot in my opinion.

People in foreign countries feel similar about Xbox vs. PlayStation and did so even before the PS4 reveal.
 
Well, hopefully this teaches the TVTVTV/parole box boosters a valuable lesson. Let them go work in the Office365 division or whatnot and let the champions for gaming first inside Microsoft lead the way next go round.
Serves them right.
 
Please don't refer to it as "xbone". If you were being sincere you would say X1, XB1 or Xbox One. A game console deserves more respect than that.

Press F.

No.

PS4 - 36m (Jan 1st- Official)
XB1 - 19m (rumored 18m + 1m extra for unaccounted Xbox during past month - guesstimate)
WiiU - 13m (last official count 10m as of August 1st? - guesstimate)

That's a bit of an understatement.
 
Following up a crazy idea with an even crazier idea doesn't make the first one seem more plausible.

I was just asking for better ideas. It's easy to just shot down ideas, anyone can do that.
I'm curious to what people think MS can reasonably do to gain the majority of the market. I'm not sure they are even considering that at this point.
 
If we disregard their competition, they're doing better! Who would've thunk it?

Since people are quoting 2:1 to PS4, why is it wrong to use that same ratio to say that they are not doing that badly in a multi billion dollar industry? It's not like we're talking single digit adoption here.
 
There is no competition from MS, they are a regional competitor at best, especially this gen.

Their main rival has twice the market share, a global brand and all the momentum.

It is the Xbox that needs to differentiate itself from the PS4, as the market stands it is what the PS4 is and does that the market wants, the X1 is the weaker, less desirable of the two.

I'll agree to disagree on what degree of competition MS poses, but I agree that Sony has all the advantage and momentum at this point.

I'm not suggesting that the PS4 *needs* to differentiate itself. I'm suggesting that it could based on how VR shakes out. MS definitely needs to find a new angle, but depending on Sony's focus in the next couple years, they may or may be able to continue to lean on traditional gaming (Maybe focusing on W10 integration of something).
 
Any better ideas to get the majority of the market? Give the console away for free?
Maybe make a product people want at a price that makes sense without alienating a significant portion of your market with serious missteps and an almost complete lack of focus on all but a single region?
 
Maybe make a product people want at a price that makes sense without alienating a significant portion of your market with serious missteps and an almost complete lack of focus on all but a single region?

I think they did that when Phil Spencer took over, it's hard to imagine what else they can do at this point to gain substantial traction.
 
Please don't refer to it as "xbone". If you were being sincere you would say X1, XB1 or Xbox One. A game console deserves more respect than that.

I know you mean well but this is a whole can of worms (unless you are joking and then that's brilliant). The last time this came up, well.. that thread was both golden and sad.

As far as the topic goes, the ship has passed and sailed for this generation as competing for the market leader. Microsoft just needs to consolidate their audience, grow in meaningful ways, and soldier on to the next step in their gaming division. Make the best games they can, avoid their previous PR snafus, and that's about it. I really think they should drop the MAU nonsense and just be realistic, as even if it's not a gloatable number, it shows they are above board with their perception. (granted no company is really all that transparent but the switching to MAU thing is too much)

I jumped from the 360 to the PS4 but towards the later half of this generation, if they build from within, and focus on just being the best they can be, I'd consider it as a supplemental platform kind like with the original xbox.
 
18M is not bad at all considering the price point they started with and all the fuckups that happened in their 1st year. It's still solid compared to other consoles, that it stays solid is another matter.
 
I just simply don't think it would have mattered. They made solid effort with trying with the 360 during a time in which the PS3 had a lot of negativity and it still didn't matter.

Sony came out stronger this gen vs. last gen and the Xbox brand didn't have a one year head start this time.

The Xbox brand has gained popularity since 2005 but on the flip side, it really only did so in the territoires in which the Xbox One is currently doing solid in.

The way I feel about this is similar to how I feel when I see people making statements about Nintendo making a "major comeback" if the NX is powerful and has third party support. The general audience is simply too locked into thinking the Xbox and PlayStation brands are the appropriate places to play core games due to more than a decade of solid support for that type of gaming and acceptable online play. It would take Nintendo many years plus some really silly mistakes from Xbox and PlayStation for them to be in the spot in my opinion.

People in foreign countries feel sinilar about Xbox vs. PlayStation and did so even before the PS4 reveal.

Of course it mattered during the 360 era!

They achieved a gigantic jump in marketshare, and they even took over the UK! You are thinking of this as a zero-sum, winner-takes-all game when making this analysis, when the comparison should be the Deltas in market share. It's clear that the 360 was a gigantic step forward in Europe in this regard.
 
Either that number is incorrect, or Microsoft's sell through is millions higher than that figure. I remember seeing Xbox Live numbers in the past (Gold + Silver), and I don't remember them ever amounting to an overwhelming majority of the overall console install base.
 
Please don't refer to it as "xbone". If you were being sincere you would say X1, XB1 or Xbox One. A game console deserves more respect than that.
na... Xbox One is X.B One. Say it as one word? Xbone.

I know you are joking.
I agree, people should show more respect for a console that's sold 18 million in the US alone.
What?
Not that far behind?

2:1 is a huge advantage.

Xbox is the way behind to the point it's not even a competition.
compared to what happened in the 6th gen where Ps2 was soaring, where the Xbox1/GameCube/dreamcast combined in sales weren't half of its?

The Ps4 by definition has the advantage but imo xbone isn't that far behind (again, that isn't to imply it'll catch up though. Just that to me the gap isn't that huge)
 
I was doing 36 + 18 = 54M. 18 / 54M = 0.33 (1/3). Not counting wii-u.
Well that's pretty friggin convenient that you're not counting the Wii U.

Please don't refer to it as "xbone". If you were being sincere you would say X1, XB1 or Xbox One. A game console deserves more respect than that.
latest
 
Top Bottom