Report: WB is worried about ‘Batman v Superman’, but not because of its quality

Status
Not open for further replies.
We already have a thread about this rumor. Could've just added BoF's report to that.

On top of that, all this worry is coming from the fact that WB had a terrible 2015 and is fighting a hostile takeover. The executives jobs are on the line and a lot is banking on this film being big.
 
I know I'm going to see it, too burnt out on the Marvel happytime super hero films. Interested in seeing something a bit darker. Also seeing it for wonder woman and hoping her solo film is successful. We need some more female driven super hero movies.
 
FQRcCjV.gif


This isn't some mindbending arthouse film. This isn't a mainstream type like Inception. It's two superheroes beating the crap out of each other.

The film probably cost $250m+ to make. They can't afford to not make it a big popcorn blockbuster flick. It has to have mass appeal. If it fails on that front it will flop like Superman Returns.
 
We already have a thread about this rumor. Could've just added BoF's report to that.

On top of that all this worry is coming from the fact that WB had a terrible 2015 and is fighting a hostile takeover. The executives jobs are on the line and a lot is banking on this film being big.

Damn shame that a year with fury road and creed is considered a terrible year. God damn wack audiences

The state of franchise films is a joke. We had arguably 2 of the best sequels of all time and they underperformed
 
On one hand it sounds like spin, on the other Marvel movies for the most part are the prime example of empty action pop movies that are brainless fun. I'll wait until next month to decide. I personally don't have a ton of faith in Snyder, esp with some things that were in MoS which had some great moments and a few others that stopped the movie from being much better than it could have.
 
The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.

And if the original post was complaining about the visual storytelling methods of Zack Snyder that'd be one thing, but clearly the issue was taken more with the screenplay, which dictates such matters.

The guy wrote Argo, which won because it was basically Hollywood sucking its own dick.

It was also pretty good.

At least, I thought it was pretty good.

Now, that might not have had anything to do with why it won, because you're right that definitely had a hell of a lot to do with it, but it's head and shoulders above the usual oscar bait.
 
The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.
What an absurdly reductive way to look at it. There is far more to a film's story than the visual storytelling. You can criticize the direction while praising the dialogue, as one example.
 
FQRcCjV.gif


This isn't some mindbending arthouse film. This isn't a mainstream type like Inception. It's two superheroes beating the crap out of each other.

The film probably cost $250m+ to make. They can't afford to not make it a big popcorn blockbuster flick. It has to have mass appeal. If it fails on that front it will flop like Superman Returns.

s1ig2oq.gif
 
Oh god this movie is going to suck isn't it?

That's usually the impression that I get whenever someone starts claiming their work is too deep for everyone to understand.

Nothing I've seen in any of the trailers indicates that this will be too deep for a mainstream audience.
 
I've heard WB execs are actually worried because there's a 0.1% percent chance the film will accidentally rip open a hole in the fabric of the universe, casting the Earth into a terrifying dimension ruled over by sentient potato chips.

This is just speculation, of course, but I'm doing it on the internet so that makes it legitimate. You may now use my totally accurate speculation to support whatever argument you were already looking to make.
 
That's usually the impression that I get whenever someone starts claiming their work is too deep for everyone to understand.

Nothing I've seen in any of the trailers indicates that this will be too deep for a mainstream audience.

But nobody involved in the movie is claiming that it's too deep for everyone to understand.

That is not a thing that has happened.
 
It's interesting (I don't believe either rumor but I would believe WB is nervous) that the negative one got "I KNEW IT, I KNEW THIS MOVIE WOULD SUCK" while the positive spun one is getting 'LIES ALL LIES'. (for the record, neither of these sources have good track records, we should take both with a grain of salt.) Hell of a lot of confirmation bias... how is anyone supposed to take someone's opinion of this film if they are going in with preconceived notions?

The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.

Uh no... directors main job is to get the best out of his actors... direct the actors.
 
I've heard WB execs are actually worried because there's a 0.1% percent chance the film will accidentally rip open a hole in the fabric of the universe, casting the Earth into a terrifying dimension ruled over by sentient potato chips.

This is just speculation, of course, but I'm doing it on the internet so that makes it legitimate. You may now use my totally accurate speculation to support whatever argument you were already looking to make.

Oh god, this movie is going to suck* isn't it?

*
all of time and space into the empty blackness of the void
 
Is there any reason to think that BoF has any shred of insight into what WB executives think or is this just another case of people jumping the gun?
 
I prefer this route to Marvel. Marvel's movies bore the shit out of me. A little depth is not a bad thing.

It doesn't have to be one or the other. Winter Soldier showed that these kinds of films can have amazing action scenes and special effects at the same as as having interesting characters and modern thematic relevance.

However the former is required to get the audiences through the door. I wouldn't mind more depth to my superhero films, but if it doesn't deliver on the action and fun and set pieces, people won't be telling their friends about it.

Guess I'll skip it. Hate pretentious Oscar bait crap.

Did you read the article, or even the OP? It's none of those things and not pretending to be.
 
I'm not sure I can handle another month of this kind of nonsense. Can it be March 25th already so we can judge it for ourselves? I don't know what's worse, all this supposed 'insider' bullshit or the people already making up their minds that the film sucks.
 
The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.

I was replying to a post that said Zack Snyder's signature storytelling is "full of endless pits of backstories on top of backstories on top of backstories".

I don't see what visual storytelling has to do with a story/script being over bloated with backstories.
 
Chris Terrio (Argo) wrote the screenplay for Batman vs Superman, not Zack Snyder.

And the screenplay is indeed pretty good. A far, far better take on the material than Man of Steel, at least. But it still has to survive being shot through the Snyderprism.

Getting Goyer out of there was the best thing they could have done for this film. If they can get a different director for Justice League, they may finally have something great on their hands.
 
I was replying to a post that said Zack Snyder's signature storytelling is "full of endless pits of backstories on top of backstories on top of backstories".

Visual storytelling has nothing to do with a story/script being over bloated with backstories.

I'm sick and writing on my phone, apologies for not paying attention.

Still, that's absolutely something Snyder could've worked with Goyer on in pre-production or trimmed down on in post with his editor. It's not like Man of Steel was coming in too short.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom