darkistheway
Member
New info = new thread. You know this.Sort of off-topic but I just ate a Cheeto that looked like penis.
New info = new thread. You know this.Sort of off-topic but I just ate a Cheeto that looked like penis.
It was one of a kind.
Chris Terrio (Argo) wrote the screenplay for Batman vs Superman, not Zack Snyder.
The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.
We already have a thread about this rumor. Could've just added BoF's report to that.
On top of that all this worry is coming from the fact that WB had a terrible 2015 and is fighting a hostile takeover. The executives jobs are on the line and a lot is banking on this film being big.
The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.
The guy wrote Argo, which won because it was basically Hollywood sucking its own dick.
Such a fucking stupid scene. Only good thing about it is that it's a nice gif. In fact it should be used whenever a director to do something as stupid as what Snyder did then to tell them to knock it off.![]()
This part?
What an absurdly reductive way to look at it. There is far more to a film's story than the visual storytelling. You can criticize the direction while praising the dialogue, as one example.The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.
2deep4u
The guy wrote Argo, which won because it was basically Hollywood sucking its own dick.
![]()
This isn't some mindbending arthouse film. This isn't a mainstream type like Inception. It's two superheroes beating the crap out of each other.
The film probably cost $250m+ to make. They can't afford to not make it a big popcorn blockbuster flick. It has to have mass appeal. If it fails on that front it will flop like Superman Returns.
How nice of WB to come with the automatic fanboy response if the movie under-performs.
Oh god this movie is going to suck isn't it?
What an absurdly reductive way to look at it. There is far more to a film's story than the visual storytelling. You can criticize the direction while praising the dialogue, as one example.
That's usually the impression that I get whenever someone starts claiming their work is too deep for everyone to understand.
Nothing I've seen in any of the trailers indicates that this will be too deep for a mainstream audience.
The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.
I've heard WB execs are actually worried because there's a 0.1% percent chance the film will accidentally rip open a hole in the fabric of the universe, casting the Earth into a terrifying dimension ruled over by sentient potato chips.
This is just speculation, of course, but I'm doing it on the internet so that makes it legitimate. You may now use my totally accurate speculation to support whatever argument you were already looking to make.
But nobody involved in the movie is claiming that it's too deep for everyone to understand.
That is not a thing that has happened.
Uh no... directors main job is to get the best out of his actors... direct the actors.
Point taken. I withdraw the "absurdly."I said "as much as" not "instead of."
![]()
This part?
I see that now, the way that the initial article reads can be a little bit confusing on that.
Uh no... directors main job is to get the best out of his actors... direct the actors.
I prefer this route to Marvel. Marvel's movies bore the shit out of me. A little depth is not a bad thing.
Guess I'll skip it. Hate pretentious Oscar bait crap.
The director is as-much the film's storyteller as the writer. Film is a visual medium, the director is largely responsible for all of the visual story-telling.
Chris Terrio (Argo) wrote the screenplay for Batman vs Superman, not Zack Snyder.
Deep Story.
Zach Snyder movie.
I can't.
What.
Did you read the article, or even the OP? It's none of those things and not pretending to be.
I was replying to a post that said Zack Snyder's signature storytelling is "full of endless pits of backstories on top of backstories on top of backstories".
Visual storytelling has nothing to do with a story/script being over bloated with backstories.