LOL, do they actually think this thing will sell ?
Sony, don't be like them.
I don't see how pointing out the truth is "damage control".This "PS VR is not comparable to Rift/Vive" is some kind of pre damage control?
The funny thing is Bandai-Namco actually had a SAO VR demo running on the oculus like 2 years ago.
Except it actually will have a VR controller compared to the Rift.
Touch will be $150. I'm pretty certain of that.
There is no SKU of the PS VR that doesn't have a VR controller.They will have a SKU without 'VR controllers' and Oculus will have a SKU with VR controllers by the time the PSVR launches.
Except it actually will have a VR controller compared to the Rift.
There is no SKU of the PS VR that doesn't have a VR controller.
The DS4 can be tracked in 3D space. The Rift's Xbox One controller can not.
Was VR that expensive in the 90s as well?
As happens with Oculus, this price, plus the one of the other device that will run the games makes it too expensive to have a decently big enough niche market.
Obviously VR headsets wouldn't be mainstream since day one, but need a certain amount of early adopters to justify the devs to bet in VR, and to justify the investment in future hardware revisions for Facebook and HTC.
PS4 already has a fair enough amount of installed consoles, its cost is way cheaper than a VR ready PC for new users. If PSVR is priced under $450-$500 (AND 450-500, since EMEA/PAL is the biggest PS market), it would be the only VR platform that may reach a decent and healthy amount of sales to provide a decent amount from profesional developers and potential profitable hardware in the long run.
How much does a kidney go for these days?
Thats actually quite big I think. I mean while the Oculus and Vive have an open plattform, lots of experimental stuff, "old games patched to VR" etc. the Sony one is exclusive to a closed plattform.
$250,000 on the black market.
They won't be, they'll be inferior.
It will, easily. Reminder that they don't need to selll millions upon millions of this thing. They know what market they are targeting and they will easily sell through most of whatever number they ship. They don't have crazy ass expectations for it, don't worry about that.
It will, easily. Reminder that they don't need to selll millions upon millions of this thing. They know what market they are targeting and they will easily sell through most of whatever number they ship. They don't have crazy ass expectations for it, don't worry about that.
They won't, at a cost of the actual quality of the thing.
I don't see how pointing out the truth is "damage control".
There is no SKU of the PS VR that doesn't have a VR controller.
The DS4 can be tracked in 3D space. The Rift's Xbox One controller can not.
This "PS VR is not comparable to Rift/Vive" is some kind of pre damage control?
Touch will be $150. I'm pretty certain of that.
Sure, if you want to be pedantic then you can maybe buy a PS VR without it being able to function at all because the camera is required.My point stands. VR controllers will almost certainly be available for the Rift by the time PSVR launches. And if I want to be pedantic, a SKU that is just the headset (which we are expecting) doesn't contain a VR controller. Sure, you'll already have one that came with your PS4... but I already have Razer Hydras.
It is a factual statement.
That's a completely different concept. New phones are priced high because they are almost a fashion item, so there is a premium that goes down after 6 months. This is a new technology that they should be pricing at cost or as close to cost as possible to maximize adoption. I certainly hope they aren't pricing it this high because of a premium they're attaching to it.
They actually need to ship millions - if they can't reach critical mass of users to make developing VR games profitable it'll end with not enough content to consume on VR.
This is the one where you have to practically dedicate a room of your house to use it correct?
Price is one issue, but man that kind of blows that you need that much space to enjoy it.
This already includes controllers and trackers.. The oculus motion controller is sold separately and it will make it cost much close to the Vive.Why would you get this over Oculus Rift?
Sure, if you want to be pedantic then you can maybe buy a PS VR without it being able to function at all because the camera is required.
Congrats
Actually, with the kinds of PCs needed to run VR at spec (980s and similar), the PS4 is definitely closer to the Samsung in terms of raw power. By a good margin too.No it isn't.
PSVR is closer in capabilities and features to Rift and Vive than Gear VR. A PS4 is closer in power to a PC than a Samsung Galaxy S6.
I mean, you're not playing Fallout 4 on your phone.
Why would you get this over Oculus Rift?
No it isn't.
PSVR is closer in capabilities and features to Rift and Vive than Gear VR. A PS4 is closer in power to a PC than a Samsung Galaxy S6.
I mean, you're not playing Fallout 4 on your phone.
The EU cost is what worries me more.
Why would you get this over Oculus Rift?