Even if Scalia's seat is filled Ruth is 83 and unlikely to serve another 8 years. Seeing how key the SC has been in the past 8 years you need to factor this in to the next POTUS.Wow, so people really think the supreme court vacancy will go unfilled? That's ultra toxic. But yeah, seems like that's a possibility.![]()
If Hill runs on "things are gunna suck real bad if THEY win" and Trump runs on "things suck now and will get better when I win", then I think trump has a glimmer of hope.
Because fortunately, don't need faith in people or anything. Just need faith in math, statistics, and the electoral map which, even if the election does get a lot closer than expected, nonetheless don't actually give him a path to victory bar a catastrophe happening. There just aren't even votes for him to grab to make the math work.I don't really understand how someone can so confidently and arrogantly say 'No' considering what the guy have achieved so far, despite people mocking and ridiculing him and despite he has upturned many conventional wisdom up their asses and pounded their heads to oblivion.
Wouldn't republican voter turnouts be lower with Trump? Because I can't honestly believe that all of the republican voting base is willing to support this buffoon just because he's the GOP nominee.
I have to imagine there are actually quite a handful of intelligent republicans out there who think this guy is irredeemably unfit for a role as Commander-In-Chief.
And with that exact same idea in mind, I think democratic turnout will be higher. People have to, at some point, realize that this lunacy has to end, and even if you're not a staunch Hillary/Sanders supporter, I could see people voting democrat just to ensure that Trump doesn't get elected.
Hispanic Republicans, not Hispanics in generalTrump is winning with hispanics.
Let that sink in for a moment. That's how fed are the people of "mainstream" politics. They don't give a shit and they will vote against their interest like republicans "white" people did for the last 50-60 years.
Yep.
Trump's numbers with independents is abysmal, and he's going to lose latinos by significant margins. Romney won 25% of them nationally..I can see this dropping another 5 to 10 points.
This seems the most plausible to me.Wouldn't republican voter turnouts be lower with Trump? Because I can't honestly believe that all of the republican voting base is willing to support this buffoon just because he's the GOP nominee.
I have to imagine there are actually quite a handful of intelligent republicans out there who think this guy is irredeemably unfit for a role as Commander-In-Chief.
And with that exact same idea in mind, I think democratic turnout will be higher. People have to, at some point, realize that this lunacy has to end, and even if you're not a staunch Hillary/Sanders supporter, I could see people voting democrat just to ensure that Trump doesn't get elected.
I've been saving every post since the beginning that has said something to the effect of, "Donald Trump has no chance" or "Donald's just going to make a fool out of himself" for the sole purpose of if he's elected, I can go back and make a fool out of them.
well i've been saving every announcement post of a 'building a donald trump not-winning crow-eating list' for the sole purpose of if he's not elected, i can go back and make a fool out of them.
my secret? no one knows yet because i'm keeping this fiendishly elegant plan to myself.
Has Trump said whether he would self finance in the general? He hasn't spent much in the primary rave but I can't see him spending 500 million + of his own money on this.
This seems the most plausible to me.
He's disliked so much within his party that I can imagine a lot of Republicans stay home.
On the contrary, liberals will want to make sure Trump cannot win.
you guys are doing to much reverse psychology, the more you say he can not, the more likely it will happen, as people will feel they are being told who to vote for...here in the UK the Labour party had someone go for leader who everyone said he had no chance...He won by a landslide. if you push the electorate with a message of 'you can not that' they will bite back
It's good to see you're reconsidering your theory of a GOP smokescreen convention taking the wins away from Trump and pushing Marco forward.
Republican nomination? Yes.
General election? No.
When did Jeremy Corbyn win an election?
I don't really understand how someone can so confidently and arrogantly say 'No' considering what the guy have achieved so far, despite people mocking and ridiculing him and despite he has upturned many conventional wisdom up their asses and pounded their heads to oblivion.
you guys are doing to much reverse psychology, the more you say he can not, the more likely it will happen, as people will feel they are being told who to vote for...here in the UK the Labour party had someone go for leader who everyone said he had no chance...He won by a landslide. if you push the electorate with a message of 'you can not that' they will bite back
I placed my bets before Iowa:
$100 on Trump to win the GOP nomination
$100 on Hillary to win it ALL
so far, I'm looking good to win both bets
![]()
He has destroyed some of the most hateful and vicious Republicans out there. He could easily crush Hillary. Hillary is barely getting by Bernie.