Valve, Sony, MS, EA, Ubisoft and Activision have all done much, much worse than this in the short time since this gen started.
ND fucked up here, but if you're honestly suggesting that no other company in this industry has done worse in recent history then you're horribly deluded.
I'm also curious if the shot we see after the zoom in on the painting is going to have to be changed too - I didn't quite see, was it clearly based on the Assassin's Creed art or was it not meant to be a direct transition? That's the bigger screwup if any actual assets were based on that art.
Exactly what I thought, Ubisoft has been shat on for less here.
Whoa there, let's not get carried away. UC2 UC3 and TLOU are all great game.
Do you want them or everyone that is not offended by this to offer you some potatoes? Maybe some lettuce and tomatoes too?Why are people saying "good on them" for changing out a stolen picture they didn't have the rights to use in the first place and just giving a lip service apology?
The bare minimum would be changing the art and keeping quite.I was asked what they should have done instead of just swapping out stolen art for their own and saying sorry. I suggested paying, I'm not speculating I'm just saying they don't really deserve praise for doing the bare minimum once it hit the public eye.
Just wondering, if that was the case, does it really matter? I think pretty much everyone (at least those who had seen the thread) had gotten to say what they wanted to say, and it would also just be repeats of other posts, basically saying that this shouldnt happen and that it was a mixup etc.. Dont think there was anything thats being missed out by waiting for a reupload of the trailer, if that was the case.lol @ waiting until the video was fixed before reopening the thread
Personally I could see it passing a fair use defense, but it's certainly faux pas for an industry staple to let something like that happen, at the very least.
Alas, apology has been issued and image replaced. A black mark on ND, but harmless IMHO. I think they'll shrug it off and take steps to avoid a repeat in the future.
You've been peddling this narrative and it's never been true. Unless of course a bunch of typical shit poster speak for everyone now.
Yeah, I don't get it either. They made a mistake, fixed it and apologized. People acting like ND ripped off that artist for good.
No it's actually quite the opposite, where people went out of their way to protect their beloved Naughty Dog.
This is such an asanine non-issue. The artist could have been cited at the end of the trailer.
This is such an asanine non-issue. The artist could have been cited at the end of the trailer.
i guess u could say......this is........a thief's end
This is such an asanine non-issue. The artist could have been cited at the end of the trailer.
Come on!.I thought i was a tribute at first!.Why should i think it was malicius?.Do you think ND doesnt have enough good artists to make a beach drawing?. Dont you think they lost much more copying an internet image?.Is common sense but people with agendas takes advantage from anything and this pic was a fuel barrel for them.never presumed anything. Everyone wanted to write it off immediately because it was naughty dog and that's sad.
Who's offended? I'm not saying what they did for their apology and asset change was even bad, it just doesn't really deserve praise for doing the bare minimum.Do you want them or everyone that is not offended by this to offer you some potatoes? Maybe some lettuce and tomatoes too?
Nah, once it's in the public eye they know being quiet would be more harmful, especially with how nitpicky gamers are. The bare minimum is a token apology.The bare minimum would be changing the art and keeping quite.
How much do you think they should pay the artist?I was asked what they should have done instead of just swapping out stolen art for their own and saying sorry. I suggested paying, I'm not speculating I'm just saying they don't really deserve praise for doing the bare minimum once it hit the public eye.
Just wondering, if that was the case, does it really matter? I think pretty much everyone (at least those who had seen the thread) had gotten to say what they wanted to say, and it would also just be repeats of other posts, basically saying that this shouldnt happen and that it was a mixup etc.. Dont think there was anything thats being missed out by waiting for a reupload of the trailer, if that was the case.
Yeah, heads might be rolling as we speak despite the calm nature of ND's response to the issue.I imagine Evan Wells not being too happy about this. Whether it's a single artist's fault, it looks bad on the whole company.
Plagarism doesn't matter apparently
Heh.defendant in plagiarism case: 'you know this really is an asinine non-issue, the person whose work i copied without citation could have been cited at the end of my work'
So all this noise over a concept art...
Smells like a PS4 exclusive is on the way.
I don't think this should reflect on ND as a company but an artist stealing from a fellow artist is extremely shitty.
Outrage generation. I'll take the potatoes of you don't mind.Do you want them or everyone that is not offended by this to offer you some potatoes? Maybe some lettuce and tomatoes too?
Best first party in the industry makes a stupid mistake: burn!
I'm more surprised that someone actually noticed that.
Its a ND game.It is analyzed microscopically by some people.Besides it smells like there is a pinch of salt between ND and UBI.I'm more surprised that someone actually noticed that.
Yeah, heads might be rolling as we speak despite the calm and playful nature of ND's response to the issue.
At the very least, someone is getting a very stern talking to.
With that you are implying that the ND artist had evil intentions rather than this being an regrettable oversight not checking where the picture originally came from.
I wanted to check if the trailer was replaced on the PS Blogs (US, EU and France... 'cause I'm French) and both EU and US have put the new one but not on PS Blog France :|