Not sure why ND didn't just capture an image of the island from their own game and proceeded to put it through Photoshop filters though.
Looks a lot like a Photoshop piece I did in my Color & Form class in college about 10 years ago.
Can a level be redesigned this close to launch if it was based on stolen artwork? Or would it not matter?
Who said that?.OMG BEST COMPANY EVAR HAVE MY BABIES NEIL.
Doesn't matter at all. The issue was the artwork not the level.Can a level be redesigned this close to launch if it was based on stolen artwork? Or would it not matter?
You should always know exactly where everything came from in a thing you're selling. That's not an excuse. Unless a painting is in the public domain, no one's art is just "random."
AAA video games contain literally hundreds of thousands of textures. That some of them end up being copied from Google, with or without intent, is unavoidable.
Did you even read what he said?
I didn't say it was an excuse nor that they were right... I just said they probably didn't know it was from another game.
Can a level be redesigned this close to launch if it was based on stolen artwork? Or would it not matter?
I'm not sure what the artists intentions were but I don't think you'll find many professional artists using another persons work for a professional project without at least looking to credit the original artist.
I understand that's not something that would be broadcast, I'm simply saying that going the extra mile to pay is something worthy of praise. Doing what they did is just what should have been done at this point, nothing more or less. In terms of the finer details from behind the scenes, I realize that's not something we'd know. My response in which I stated that was just me saying what I think is deserving of praise.They're not going to broadcast that. Any settlement between the two is going to be private, and in a case like this, their lawyers have probably already talked. Also financial compensation is a tricky prospect at this stage since the stolen artwork has only appeared in a free trailer. Had it gone unnoticed until the actual release and they made money with this stolen asset, then Sony would definitely have had to pay.
I legitimately have no idea what amount it should be. I'm not pretending to be an expert on the value, I'm just saying that achieving an agreed payment between the parties is more deserving of praise than just changing an asset and saying sorry.Yeah, but throw us a figure, to kinda get and idea the damage done to the artist.
I've basically explained this already a few times now, but I did mention earlier that the agreement would be made between ND and the artist or more likely ND and Ubisoft. I realize that it was work done on Ubi's dime and is their property.Lol, that artwork almost for sure doesn't belong to person who painted it. It's Ubisoft's property, and while I suppose they could have paid Ubisoft to use it, it was clearly used by mistake and it would make no sense to pay to use art from a different game. Right now, they could arrange some kind of damages payout to Ubisoft but that kind of thing would be layers talking to lawyers and it would never be made public.
As an artist, you have a responsibility to know where it comes from if you are expecting to use it. They should've at least know they were not allowed to use it because it probably didn't come from a source that allows free use or, obviously, wasn't created by them.
My mistake. Looks like I'm the stupid one.Given that ND already responded and apologized I think we can dispense with this sort of defense. It wasn't a "nod" or a "reference." They screwed up.
Can a level be redesigned this close to launch if it was based on stolen artwork? Or would it not matter?
He answered question about why did they used art from other game, not excuse.
Or maybe Neil Druckmann himself has ACIV artbook and said let's use this, nobody will notice lol.
He answered question about why did they used art from other game, not excuse.
My mistake. Looks like I'm the stupid one.
i mean lets be real for a moment...plagiarism in a trailer is one thing, basing your game on stolen concept art from another game is something else entirely and even a company as morally bankrupt as naughty dog surely wouldn't go that far??
Did you even read what he said?
As an artist, you have a responsibility to know where it comes from if you are expecting to use it. They should've at least know they were not allowed to use it because it probably didn't come from a source that allows free use or, obviously, wasn't created by them.
Can a level be redesigned this close to launch if it was based on stolen artwork? Or would it not matter?
i mean lets be real for a moment...plagiarism in a trailer is one thing, basing your game on stolen concept art from another game is something else entirely and even a company as morally bankrupt as naughty dog surely wouldn't go that far??
As an artist, you have a responsibility to know where it comes from if you are expecting to use it. They should've at least know they were not allowed to use it because it probably didn't come from a source that allows free use or, obviously, wasn't created by them.
Looks a lot like a Photoshop piece I did in my Color & Form class in college about 10 years ago.
![]()
Right, but my point was that it doesn't matter whether it was from a game or not - if ND had thought it was just a random image and it was from something besides AC, that'd still be bad. If they didn't realize it was from another game they still should've caught it is what I mean.
Wait? Is this for real? It's the exact same in the updated version of the trailer
To clarify, @BangBangClick is one of my best buddies back up in Montreal. This is not the first time we've been on Kotaku together ;-)
Reposting from the other thread.
Jonathan Cooper is an ex-ubisoft animator. He joined Naughty Dog and said some stuff about his previous employer when the female assassins thingy came to light.
![]()
![]()
Now with this news, an Ubisoft Montreal dev (creative director) tweeted this to him
![]()
He waited two years... all for revenge.
Right, but my point was that it doesn't matter whether it was from a game or not - if ND had thought it was just a random image and it was from something besides AC, that'd still be bad. If they didn't realize it was from another game they still should've caught it is what I mean.
Right, but my point was that it doesn't matter whether it was from a game or not - if ND had thought it was just a random image and it was from something besides AC, that'd still be bad. If they didn't realize it was from another game they still should've caught it is what I mean.
ND don't look too bad here, it was probably some outsourcing mistake, they admitted they fucked up, rectified it quickly and have put out an official statement apologizing to all parties
the only people who came out looking bad were the fanboys trying to play it down and defend them lol
Are they?
Some people going to super embarassing lengths to rationalise this.
"It's an easter egg!"
"It's a coincidence!"
"It's not even the same, there's no pirate!"
"Ubisoft probably licenced it to them!"
It's hardly the crime of the century but, c'mon brehs.
Agree and as said before I totally agree it is a fuck up. But I think it's way too harsh from some people in this thread to call for blood or compensation payments or stuff like that.
Wait? Is this for real? It's the exact same in the updated version of the trailer
Looks a lot like a Photoshop piece I did in my Color & Form class in college about 10 years ago.