• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Iowa bill would allow kids to handle handguns under parental supervision

Status
Not open for further replies.
something tells me kids in iowa are already handling handguns, shotguns, .22's and muzzle loaders, and theres a whole list of counties where people are too damn spread out for anyone to check.
 
I don't know, my dad got me a 20-guage Remington for skeet practice, and eventually dove hunting when I was 9, and somehow I never managed to murder anyone, intentionally or otherwise. I think the part about parental supervision is important, and I think you're all being a bit alarmist. It'd be interesting to revisit this in a year when nothing bad has come of it.

I live in California, by the way, and this would have been Christmas 1998.
 
this is fine and normal, almost everyone i know has gone hunting or to a shooting range with their parent/s in their early teens or younger. If anything the law should only make a single distinction: if you're under 18, you can only use a firearm under parental supervision for hunting or target practicing purposes. No idea why anyone would have a problem with that.

Does that include black kids?

Or will they get shot for playing with toy guns.

The NRA/Gun advocacy community could gain huge credibility overnight by focusing on how frequently and consistently black people's 2nd amendment rights are ignored and invalidated compared to whites. I wonder why they don't...
 
You want UK invade a country that let kids handle guns?

Yes I do. Ironic, when you think about it, I guess.

But basically this whole "America" experiment just isn't working out. We gave it the old college try, but it's run its course, methinks. We should end it humanely while there's still a small degree of dignity.
 
I'm not sure this is meaningfully different than the handling of rifles by kids (under parental supervision) that is already in place.

I'm more upset that the legislature wasted their time on this needless bill in the first place. I can't imagine too many parents were getting strung up for allowing their kids to use handguns under their supervision.

The reactions in this thread are interesting though. I'm going to guess not many of you got a gun for Christmas when you were 6 like I did. It was a BB gun but a gun nonetheless. I was given a 12 gauge when I was 8 (though I wasn't allowed to actually shoot it until I was about 14). Completely different worlds we grew up in.
 
I would strongly advise minority parents in this state to refrain from letting their children carry weapons. May as well paint a target on their back. Sadly.
 
I'm not sure this is meaningfully different than the handling of rifles by kids (under parental supervision) that is already in place.

I'm more upset that the legislature wasted their time on this needless bill in the first place. I can't imagine too many parents were getting strung up for allowing their kids to use handguns under their supervision.

The reactions in this thread are interesting though. I'm going to guess not many of you got a gun for Christmas when you were 6 like I did. It was a BB gun but a gun nonetheless. I was given a 12 gauge when I was 8 (though I wasn't allowed to actually shoot it until I was about 14). Completely different worlds we grew up in.

Clearly you and I just barely managed to escape the horrific upbringing that would have led us into shooting up a school.
 
Extremely. conservative.

Even Nebraska has only one or two conservative radio stations. In Iowa, most of the dial is brimstone/conservative talk/blahblah.

Iowa City is a bastion of sanity, along with some of the other larger cities. Outside of them, it's basically Nebraska on steroids. (My home state.)

This bill is lunacy, and just as importantly, so is the existing law letting kids handle other kinds of guns. Bringing hand guns up to par with a stupid bill does not make it okay. I had to triple read that it was UNDER age 14, rather than over. Totally batshit insane.
 
While we're at it, we should let them use power tools, repeal all child labor laws, and groom them for child rearing at earlier ages. 12-14 sounds about right.



But seriously, I will never understand exposing kids to guns like this, supervision or not. Weapons are not for children.
 
It may come as shocking news, but one of the best ways to teach a kid about safe gun handling and the inherent danger of guns is to teach them how to shoot. Even in my incredibly liberal Southern Oregon town, a lot of my friends grew up learning how to shoot, and those people were always very vigilant about safe gun handling in my experience. But let me tell you a little story. When I was much younger, my dad gave me a small single-shot .410 shotgun that I would use when we would go bird hunting. One day I had it in my room for some reason or another (it was probably being cleaned), and a friend of mine came over whose parents owned guns but never really taught him anything about them. A combination of curiosity, lack of gun safety knowledge, and overall dumbassery compelled him to pick up the shotgun, cock the hammer, point it right at my face, and pull the trigger. Obviously it was unloaded because I'm still here, but that's the kind of dumbass shit kids (or even adults) do when they're not taught proper gun safety and suddenly find themselves around guns.

I took an extensive youth gun safety education course when I was 13 by the way, and the final day focuses on actual shooting. It's generally accepted that you can't teach proper gun safety without some kind of hands-on training.

The real problem in this story is actually you having a shotgun lying around in your room.

Kids shouldn't have guns period. Gun courses are just to cure the side-effects, not the disease.

Someone here posted a clear graph that shows gun related deaths in the US are fucking out of this world... but it just gets ignored.
Showing kids how to shoot guns might indeed prevent some gun accidents. You know what would prevent more gun accidents? Not having every-fucking-one owning 13 guns.
 
Yes I do. Ironic, when you think about it, I guess.

But basically this whole "America" experiment just isn't working out. We gave it the old college try, but it's run its course, methinks. We should end it humanely while there's still a small degree of dignity.

Have you played Assassins Creed 3? The Brits and their Queen will get destroyed by the colonies.
 
What could possibly go wrong.

baby-with-guns-funny-oyowr.jpg
 
But seriously, I will never understand exposing kids to guns like this, supervision or not. Weapons are not for children.

But seriously, I will never understand exposing children to vaccines like this, medical experts or not. Preventative care is not for children.
 
Was this previously not the case? I always figured because of 2nd Amendment crap anyone of any age was allowed to possess a firearm. I thought you would specifically have to limit it, which would mean repealing a previous bill limiting the ages.
 
Iowa City is a bastion of sanity, along with some of the other larger cities. Outside of them, it's basically Nebraska on steroids. (My home state.)

This bill is lunacy, and just as importantly, so is the existing law letting kids handle other kinds of guns. Bringing hand guns up to par with a stupid bill does not make it okay. I had to triple read that it was UNDER age 14, rather than over. Totally batshit insane.

Have you ever lived in a rural area? I am guessing not.

The people that have strong negative reactions to this seemingly grew up without guns being a relatively normal and safe part of life, unrelated to violence against others.

For people in families that hunt, this is perfectly normal.

All of that said, I think we need less guns and more control. But the more perspective we have about the reality of other people's normal, the more healthy the discussion can be.
 
While we're at it, we should let them use power tools, repeal all child labor laws, and groom them for child rearing at earlier ages. 12-14 sounds about right.
It's actually very common for kids to help out on the family farm, even from a young age. That often includes the use of power tools. Hell, I got a job at my grandmother's restaurant when I was 13. Child labor laws are different for family businesses (which is analogous to the "under parental supervision" clause of this law).

In fact, I think you can legally drink alcohol as a minor if you are under under parental supervision. And you can get married if you're younger than 16 as long as you have your parent's consent.

Given all of the "adult" stuff that kids are allowed to do under parental supervision, it's not surprising this law passed.
 
Are you comparing vaccines for children with guns?

Is there some joke I am not getting?

Are they not the same, though? If I don't expose my children to vaccines or gun safety courses then they won't have to worry about diseases or guns ever affecting their well-being.
 
tbh, I'm rather surprised that they couldn't already. My father would bring me out shooting before the age of 14, that was with rifles though. I don't see there being that much of a difference to be quite honest.
 
Geez, haven't any of you been a Boy Scout? We shot rifles and guns all the time. I have a merit badge for it. As long as adult supervision is at place, at a range, I don't see what the big deal is.
 
Are they not the same, though? If I don't expose my children to vaccines or gun safety courses then they won't have to worry about diseases or guns ever affecting their well-being.

Uhm no.
A vaccine is to prevent a disease. Avoiding it just increases the chance of disease/death.
A gun is a weapon. Avoiding it decreases the chance of an accident/death.

Your analogy was guns to vaccines, not gun safety courses to vaccines.
 
Geez, haven't any of you been a Boy Scout? We shot rifles and guns all the time. I have a merit badge for it. As long as adult supervision is at place, at a range, I don't see what the big deal is.

Gaf anti-gunners have achieved a level of puritanism that would make John Winthrop and Cotton Mather cringe.

I think any and all gun related activity has been purged from the Boy Scouts in all urban and suburban areas due to the reactions of hysterical, misinformed parents.
 
This is under 14 years old, though...nobody that's under 14 needs to be handling a gun. A teenager is fine, go out hunting with dad (I did) but some 7th grader? Let's not. Seriously.

Hell, at least put it on par with getting a driver's permit.
I can't speak for parents and kids these days because times change, different areas have different cultures and generations are different but i can tell you it was extremely common for my dads generation and mine in my city that kids, specifically boys were given rifles on around their 12th birthday. But, hunting was and still is very, very common here and it tends to start at a very young age.
 
Gaf anti-gunners have achieved a level of puritanism that would make John Winthrop and Cotton Mather cringe.

I think any and all gun related activity has been purged from the Boy Scouts in all urban and suburban areas due to the reactions of hysterical, misinformed parents.

That's a shame. I had a ton of fun earning that badge, and found that I had a natural talent for it. That said, we spent like 80% of our time on safety and respecting the weapon. Sad to see that those activities have been removed.
 
Uhm no.
A vaccine is to prevent a disease. Avoiding it just increases the chance of disease/death.
A gun is a weapon. Avoiding it decreases the chance of an accident/death.

Your analogy was guns to vaccines, not gun safety courses to vaccines.
Where in my original post did I make that analogy? You were the one who drew that connection.

But I still don't understand, I can just have my kids avoid diseases just like they can guns right? Because if I tell them to avoid it there is zero chance they will ever be exposed to diseases or guns, so there's no need for vaccines or gun safety courses.
 
It's odd to see abstinence-only logic presented as a viable solution for gun education by people that would almost certainly oppose abstinence-only logic in any other context. "Don't do that" isn't an effective educational method.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom