Yeah I know. I am from times to time a cynical bastard that assumes the worst of grown adults and truly believe we're fucking up the coming generations and I might go to much "think of the Children" shtick in The Simpsons. I know that. sigh.
As for helping or locking them up, you can get help while locked up...
I would love for everyone to get help. I truly do. I do not wish anyone harm that hasn't done anything. Especially the mentally ill but take a step outside that zone and harm one who can't defend themselves? Here I fully admit that I stop being rational. I can write it all down and lay out the options and truly believe in it and hope they get help but in the pit of my stomach it turns black. I can give everyone a second, a third hell even a fourth chance but there are some topics where one burn is enough. Lines in the sand so to speak.
As for this hypothetical person? Nope, they don't exist. As for Alison Rapp? I see no reason why she should lose her job, I downloaded the thesis and I'll look through it another time. Only thing Alison Rapp has done, that I know of, and I can whine about is that she makes me feel old. Seriously, I thought to myself aww what a cute girl....she's a woman not a little girl and I'm getting old...or she has the best damn skin care in the world ^^
How is this true at all? The whole point of a thesis is to argue in favor of a point, regardless of you belief in that point on a personal level. If your assignment is to argue in favor of a particular topic, or even if you're making a Devil's Advocate argument on your own, you still phrase the paper as if you, the author sides with or believes in the argument you're presenting.
If they have any brains in them at all, unlike these idiots, they'll treat this as what it is: An academic exercise in arguing a point by backing it up with evidence and rethoric. No matter how extreme, this is what an academic paper is about. No matter how much people want to get hung up on "unscientific" wording to desperately spin this into a controversy.
The agenda here is so clear that it's actually embarassing. The fake concern thrown around is disgusting, when it's clear as day what the end goal is:
To destroy this womans career by being creepy fucking stalkers, who aren't worth the air they breath in, unable to see the unspeakable irony of taking the moral high ground when they're nothing but amoral asocial bigots, who are only capable of self indulging narcisissm and hatred towards anything they can't fit into their self serving world view.
I side with the camp that argues not only for the less strict legislation against the simple possession of child pornography...
Move her to localization, everyone wins except GG! \o/I doubt she'll get fired, but I am betting Nintendo has her take a more background role and minimize her social media presence. So probably less time on Treehouse streams overall. I imagine it will be more about her safety than her presence being a bad look.
But Gamergate will celebrate it as a victory, regardless.
I'm not gonna lie, I don't know what game gate is.
I only hear about it here, and it was during localization of Fire Emblem.
I'm an absolute idiot when it comes to GamerGate. I read a wikipedia article each time I come across the name. Don't even know who are the good guys.
Fair enough. Honestly, I know I may have been a bit harsher than I needed to be, but it is a sensitive issue to me. I just feel as though we should do a lot more to help them out, because the only other alternative we have is to lock them up after they have committed the act. And not only does that set them up to fail, but it means we are allowing many more children to be victims of abuse. I know it sounds more idealist than locking them all up, but pragmatically we have no other choice. It's not ethical to lock people up before they do anything wrong, and right now we just wait for something to happen. I'd rather try to fix the situation by providing help than sit by and wait for the next victim.
You seem okay for a so-called 'cynical bastard'. And I appreciate your work. Glad we see eye to eye on the actual topic of Alison Rapp as well.
If you have a trigger, just assume that this covers them all.
This should hopefully help you understand
I agree. It's an academic paper and should be treated as such. I do believe however that the view she's arguing is her own. There are certain aspects of the paper that sell it as such and ones that typically aren't found in academic papers i.e. the use of I (which is a big nono in academic papers), the use of biased adjectives like mere, simple etc. NoA is gonna have to deal with the situation, with someone whose thesis contains this:
I side with the camp that argues not only for the less strict legislation against the simple possession of child pornography...
It's just a bad look.
Thanks. Really despicable stuff. (Though the fact that GamerGate refers to the people instead of the event (or series of related events) still grinds my gears.)
Way to take a quote out of context. She argues how more legislation against simple possession(which could mean so many things) of child pornography will not magically solve some of the issues legislation aims to address. If you bother to read the dissertation, it may be poorly written, but it conveys the idea that even with strict child pornography laws, some Western countries have more instances of child abuse/child prostitution/child trafficking compared to a country with lax CP legislation like Japan. The argument that more laws solve the problem is a red herring. I may personally disagree, but I am far from saying she is advocating for more child porn.
I did not take the quote out of context and I certainly did read the entire thesis. I understand fully what her argument is. The context the quote is used in, which you completely overlook, is: how will NoA react to someone who has that line in their thesis, because I can guarantee, if it makes it into any critical news media, it's not going to be presented with a full analysis of her paper.
https://twitter.com/notch/status/704936215259324417?lang=en
Looks like Notch is just jerking people around. Now he's asking everyone GG related to unfollow him because he decided he's an SJW now.
Either it was a backpedal, or he's just trolling social media and wants people to stop screaming at him about this stuff.
I bring it up because a ton of people have been talking about Notch being a GG supporter in this thread.
At this point notch is just a sad dude with lots of money and nothing salient to say. He's just trying to be edgy by saying that "every side is wrong I'm 2deep4u".https://twitter.com/notch/status/704936215259324417?lang=en
Looks like Notch is just jerking people around. Now he's asking everyone GG related to unfollow him because he decided he's an SJW now.
Either it was a backpedal, or he's just trolling social media and wants people to stop screaming at him about this stuff.
I bring it up because a ton of people have been talking about Notch being a GG supporter in this thread.
Why do we let these threads stay open for so long? Serious question. I just don't get it. It's either only drive by posts or "debate" that leads to shaming or hunting real people down. It was scary before and it's not much less so now.
Yeah, If you watch the video he posted I think he is more taking a middle ground stance by attempting to point out that both GG and Anti-GG are just "thought germs" that are kept alive because of emotional pandering or something. I think he was trying to prove that point by riling people up.
Yep, basically.
People don't seem to understand the impact this would have once it starts hitting more mainstream publications. It's a doom or be doomed situation. Best she can hope for is either being moved discretly in another division, or Nintendo's HR helping her get a job in another company, like good HR services usually do.
Whether you agree with what she said , if it's academix or not, the phrasing is too ambiguous to risk it in a company like this. Wouldn't be surprising nor something to really blame them for really :/ .
Edit: out of this thread now. There's nothing else to say on this topic until there's more news really.
it sure is 'coincidental' that their victim just happens to be a woman in the gaming industry tho
https://twitter.com/notch/status/704936215259324417?lang=en
Looks like Notch is just jerking people around. Now he's asking everyone GG related to unfollow him because he decided he's an SJW now.
Either it was a backpedal, or he's just trolling social media and wants people to stop screaming at him about this stuff.
I bring it up because a ton of people have been talking about Notch being a GG supporter in this thread.
Agreed. These threads are a minefield.Why do we let these threads stay open for so long? Serious question. I just don't get it. It's either only drive by posts or "debate" that leads to shaming or hunting real people down. It was scary before and it's not much less so now.
You hope someone who fights against sex trafficking and the sexual abuse of children gets a smack down?
Is that going to be like when the church of scientology defunded the cult awareness network through lawsuits and then proceeded to purchase them?
Yeah, for many things they do there at least seems to be some underlying (even if often disagreeable) concept. In this particular case it just doesn't make the least bit of sense.My favorite part of GG's involvement in getting her fired is that her very thesis has what I think is GG's motto:
"Censoring media, however questionable, does not solve societal ills."
The idiots at GG are so hell bent of harassing non-journalist women in gaming that they'll shoot down one of the few with views in line with their own.
I'm not gonna lie, I don't know what game gate is.
I only hear about it here, and it was during localization of Fire Emblem.
Actually I remember the first thread about GG inviting people who haven't heard about it to keep it that wayThe "what's GamerGate??" posts are pretty grating too, considering how long this has been going on. I get that you can't come down too hard on people, but if someone's wired in tight enough to have a GAF account, I kind of also expect the same level of social/political awareness to have passing familiarity with GG.
Why do we let these threads stay open for so long? Serious question. I just don't get it. It's either only drive by posts or "debate" that leads to shaming or hunting real people down. It was scary before and it's not much less so now.
It's really pathetic. They're terrified of equality, it would seem.
We are aproaching two years of GG "movement".
Has any non indie publisher/developer even publicly condamned them? I mean Zoe spoke at congresional hearing about online harassment FFS last year, she was multiple times on live TV talking about it.
Her thesis makes it clear that she's against the creation and distribution of child porn, how is that advocacy?
Her point is the correlation between possession and creation more than anything. She doesn't even call for legalizing possession in the thesis, but a laxing in comparison to creation.