Nah not if he was older Satoru from the future!Yeah but surely if it was somehow Satoru, the manager would have recognised him when they were speaking at the fast food restaurant.
Nah not if he was older Satoru from the future!Yeah but surely if it was somehow Satoru, the manager would have recognised him when they were speaking at the fast food restaurant.
There is no denying that at the end of this series, or even before that, many people will be disappointed. It's all about expectations. I feel that ultimately a lot of the pulp elements of the story are just there to create artificial excitement - to generate cliffhangers, make it seem like a whodunit, have hooks that people can casually latch onto and talk about, but the real meat of the story which the author wants to tell is a story about a guy regretting how he didn't maximize his childhood, and getting the change to go back and be a better person. In doing so, maybe in the future he will also be a better person. Everything else is really just fluff.
There is no denying that at the end of this series, or even before that, many people will be disappointed. It's all about expectations. I feel that ultimately a lot of the pulp elements of the story are just there to create artificial excitement - to generate cliffhangers, make it seem like a whodunit, have hooks that people can casually latch onto and talk about, but the real meat of the story which the author wants to tell is a story about a guy regretting how he didn't maximize his childhood, and getting the change to go back and be a better person. In doing so, maybe in the future he will also be a better person. Everything else is really just fluff.
Man you just confirmed it's the teacher didn't you.. :/There is no denying that at the end of this series, or even before that, many people will be disappointed. It's all about expectations. I feel that ultimately a lot of the pulp elements of the story are just there to create artificial excitement - to generate cliffhangers, make it seem like a whodunit, have hooks that people can casually latch onto and talk about, but the real meat of the story which the author wants to tell is a story about a guy regretting how he didn't maximize his childhood, and getting the change to go back and be a better person. In doing so, maybe in the future he will also be a better person. Everything else is really just fluff.
Man you just confirmed it's the teacher didn't you.. :/
Man you just confirmed it's the teacher didn't you.. :/
.......
![]()
CONFIRMED
Good interpretation.There could be multiple killers, it could be Kenya, there could be another time traveller, it could be Satoru from the future. I think by this point any "reveal" will have some people thinking it was obvious because there were "so many hints" or whatever. The reason why people write off certain suspects is because they think it is stupid. But I'm just saying that the story doesn't seem interested in being an elegant mystery where the reveal will be "OMG!!!" but rather, it seems interested in asking the why. Why does Satoru really want to help Kayo? Is it just because he wants to save his mom? That's what he says, but it's not totally true is it? He regrets not getting to know her when he first had the chance. He regrets it. The time travel mechanic is not elegantly written, but it's an excuse to allow him to reflect on his regret and have a chance to do it over. I feel the killer is the same thing. In the end it will not be about who, but why. What might motivate the killer? That could be more interesting, or at least more grounded, than following clues around wondering what is or isn't a red herring.
![]()
Copyright patent trademark
Man you just confirmed it's the teacher didn't you.. :/
I don't think people are still supposed to be guessing about this, and if they are hanging their hat on the in story reveal/confession they're probably going to be let down.
Sorry, I assumed from Basileus777's comment which was a dumb thing to do lolWhy would I be joking? Regardless of whether you think Michael Jackson was actually a pedophile, I think it's clear people like that exist. Not all of them are malicious child molesters/killers, but it's natural for society to finger them first when things go south in a community.
![]()
Copyright patent trademark
I don't think people are still supposed to be guessing about this, and if they are hanging their hat on the in story reveal/confession they're probably going to be let down.
People around the world do this. Especially if there's a death in the family like if a mother loses a child.Geez that grown woman doing open mouthed full-on sobbing like a 2 year old thing has reared it's ugly face. Is this a thing Japanese women do IRL?
Nah dude. I've been to my fair share of funerals and seen people lose it but never like an infant. In anime I'll often see women cry and sound straight up like a child wanting a bottle. This episode is just one example.People around the world do this. Especially if there's a death in the family like if a mother loses a child.
When you are crying, then you are crying.
It's the teacher.That does kinda look like Satoru but I don't think it is. Satorus mum didn't have a big enough reaction in the first episode for it to be another Satoru or whatever.
Spoiled it with information given to you in every episode. So fair game if true.So, wait did someone just spoil it for us by confirming something in the OP? Although, we have seen the killer's face to some extent in the first episode.
If it's the teacher then the fucking candy scene was unnecessary and honestly kind of an insult as an audience member. Like they weren't trying to shove it in your face the whole time.
If it isn't the teacher it could be seen as the author having fun with the audience because of all the clues towards the teacher given to you.If it isn't the teacher it's an unnecesary scene as well though.
Btw, people who're coming up with theories as to why it isn't the teacher are joking right?
If it isn't the teacher it could be seen as the author having fun with the audience because of all the clues towards the teacher given to you.
With the teacher being it is like if someone just went through mystery writing 101 and wasn't around for the subtlety lecture.
Fucking Sherlock Holmes doesn't walk around London and the killer drops the bloody knife with a letter saying "I did it", then looks at him and says 'oh that isn't mine'
True, but it could always be a character that isn't introduced and relevant to his life outside of murdering the kids. Could be a third party who observed the kids in the park and planned it all out. Satoru was focused on saving the kids not finding the culprit so the show could have the free pass of the killer being introduced later as a murdering psychopath.If the author wanted to make a successful whodunnit, he needed to introduce more potential culprits into the setting. As it is, barring crazy theories like "it's Satoru from the future", there just aren't many candidates.
Are you high?If I could reach the stars! I'd give them all to you!
Then you'd love me, love me, like you used to do, oh!
If I could turn back time, if could turn back time... Oh yeah!...
------
Hey all, sorry I got carried away by the thread's title.
o/
If the author wanted to make a successful whodunnit, he needed to introduce more potential culprits into the setting. As it is, barring crazy theories like "it's Satoru from the future", there just aren't many candidates.
The author did, in the manga.. The only visual clues for the murderer, in the manga, was special sadist like smile and eyes, with the face and body hidden in a dark-like fog, so it could be any one, any gender. And every suspect had that 1-2 moments that gave them a motive, for an evil twin side to themselves.There was 1-2 more very convincing suspects
The anime simply showed too much, too early.
Now watch the show and you will understand. This is no "Cher" series....lol
Now I'm kind of interested in reading the manga (though not before the anime ends). Given they only had twelve episodes some cuts were inevitable, but this sounds like something that has a noticeable impact on the storytelling.
The killer is obviously Satorus dad, who is also a time traveller and from whom he inherited his Revival ability.
He set up this elaborate scenario to force Satoru into action, with the goal of stimulating the growth of the Revival ability so that it can awaken its true potential, which is freely travelling to time, back and forth.
Actually it turns out Satorus entire bloodline has this special ability and their goal is to 'awaken' as many Revival users as possible, so that they can all travel to the same point in time and fend of the invasion of alien time travellers (of which Kenya is obviously one and he's acting as a scout) together.
God dammit man I'm so confused. Went back and compared the end of episode 6 where Satoru sees the murderer as he's being arrested, and he has exactly the same looking jaw and hair as the teacher. I'm so confused, he's too obvious.