You want unbiased US News?
Aljazeera US, NPR, and BBC.
That's it, that's all you get.
Also, which one of y'all was this, fess up:
https://twitter.com/DeMarko_Gage/status/708521097843445760
Not that I agree with Trump but not allowing a Presidential Candidate to make his event isn't democratic and you fall to the same level as him. Protest with your vote and not with obstructing him, this will just fuel him and strengthen him.
Less obstruction than congressFuck No x1000. We don't give hate a platform. Let this monster go "unobstructed" and by the time we all realize the mistake it will be far too late to save the democracy.
I'm not downplaying it at all, but you seem to be overstating it considering nearly every post you make is about the protest being violent or having violent motivations in some way.
Did you see how many people were there? Why aren't you talking about the 99.99999999999% of uninjured, nonviolent protestors and their legal speech? Can you do some self-analysis here on your assumptions and framing?
Is that the waitress from the first Avengers movie?
Fuck No x1000. We don't give hate a platform. Let this monster go "unobstructed" and by the time we all realize the mistake it will be far too late to save the democracy.
The entire media is his platform, and he can't be protested out of office. He has to be out voted.Fuck No x1000. We don't give hate a platform. Let this monster go "unobstructed" and by the time we all realize the mistake it will be far too late to save the democracy.
The same (false imo) argument could be employed about Trump supporters attacking minorities -- it's only a handful here or there. The problem isn't the absolute numbers. Its whether that violence is encouraged, as many here are doing, and as Trump has been doing, or whether it is discouraged. One path leads to more violence, perhaps more violence than our political structure can maintain.
The entire media is his platform, and he can't be protested out of office. He has to be out voted.
The diffirence is that Trump and his campaign promotes the use of violent rhetoric. Trump is guilty of not making efforts to distance himself from his violent supporters.The same (false imo) argument could be employed about Trump supporters attacking minorities -- it's only a handful here or there. The problem isn't the absolute numbers. Its whether that violence is encouraged, as many here are doing, and as Trump has been doing, or whether it is discouraged. One path leads to more violence, perhaps more violence than our political structure can maintain.
Yup..bigly.Protesting energizes people, it will get them out to vote.
Thank you for your post. Unfortunately, I still don't understand what you mean. The onus of what? The onus of the violence? The onus of being informed on the matter? Are you saying the protestors are to blame because, if they had googled and read a little, they would have realized the trump rally would likely result in violence? Or that the electorate in general have an onus of being informed so someone like Trump does not get elected?
Edit: wait nevermind, I think I understand. Its more of the latter -- you feel the onus of voters to understand tonights events is on them, they are to blame if tonights events make them vote for Trump. I understand and can somewhat agree, but I feel a lot of tonights impact is indirect. Trump supporters get rallied up and campaign or reach out to friends, who may never hear of tonights events directly.
Fuck No x1000. We don't give hate a platform. Let this monster go "unobstructed" and by the time we all realize the mistake it will be far too late to save the democracy.
The diffirence is that Trump and his campaign promotes the use of violent rhetoric. Trump is guilty of not making efforts to distance himself from his violent supporters.
By engaging in violence, it gives hate the only platform for tonight. A stable democracy (or representative democracy) is ultimately about using the political power imbued to change the system. Violence was probably justified to some degree when some individuals did not have any political power -- e.g. Boston tea party, or when slaves or women could not vote. And while there is some political inequality via economic inequality, I don't think that was the main issue tonight. I believe the way to fight this threat to democracy is peaceful awareness and to vote, not encouraging violence.
Where the fuck is this disingenuous "violence" narrative coming from? Peps ass?
Him, and 25 cans of RIOTS..Where the fuck is this disingenuous "violence" narrative coming from? Pepboys ass?
Your edit is a lot closer to my point. The onus is on the moderate to do their homework to be informed. Everyone from both sides will reach out to friends but people should take it upon themselves to look at the facts objectively and stand behind a vote before blindly accepting spin as truth which Trump is skilled at doing.
In regards to violence, yes we all do not condone it but forgive me if I must say that it would be rather naive to watch all of these current events unfold and not expect a tussle between folks. We know that these skirmishes solve little if nothing at all but when people gather in mass, there will always be conflict of some nature. It's a basic truth.
By engaging in violence, it gives hate the only platform for tonight. A stable democracy (or representative democracy) is ultimately about using the political power imbued to change the system. Violence was probably justified to some degree when some individuals did not have any political power -- e.g. Boston tea party, or when slaves or women could not vote. And while there is some political inequality via economic inequality, I don't think that was the main issue tonight. I believe the way to fight this threat to democracy is peaceful awareness and to vote, not encouraging violence.
He isn't wrong. Though the same can be said for conservatives.
Violence against minorities has been happening for centuries, m8. Odd that it's only a concern now.
?!?!? BLM has been all about this exact same kind of protest, continuously.I think the black lives movement has been powerful in (mostly peacefully) raising awareness, before the presidential election even got underway. We are seeing more police body cams and some (probably not enough) accountability for police violence. I'm not sure why you feel it's only a recent concern.
I agree about the expected tussle, which is why I feel the protest could be held in another location, or otherwise be more positive in nature (via campaigning for preferred canadite). It is how the conflict manifests itself that I am concerned with.
Where the fuck is this disingenuous "violence" narrative coming from? Pepboys ass?
I agree about the expected tussle, which is why I feel the protest could be held in another location, or otherwise be more positive in nature (via campaigning for preferred canadite). It is how the conflict manifests itself that I am concerned with.
I think the black lives movement has been powerful in (mostly peacefully) raising awareness, before the presidential election even got underway. We are seeing more police body cams and some (probably not enough) accountability for police violence. I'm not sure why you feel it's only a recent concern.
Where the fuck is this disingenuous "violence" narrative coming from? Pepboys ass?
You still keep calling a lot of people chanting "violent protest."If it was only me, I would have stopped. But there are multiple pages of posters defending the idea of violent protest. Not what I expected either. But I've made my point and my peace so I will stop discussing it.
Also, which one of y'all was this, fess up:
https://twitter.com/DeMarko_Gage/status/708521097843445760
And with luck the GOP will not recover untill they become a legitimate proggressive party after some soul searching. Because as they are right now they should never take the presidency.Also of egging them on in interviews about their actions. He wants these people riled up and excited since that means they're more likely to go out and vote for him. Unfortunately that also has a lot of downside, including increased violence against protesters. So far we're pretty lucky that his most violent supporter's actions have been fairly limited.
The fact is this is going to get worse as time passes and it's likely too far gone to get back in the bottle. The GOP really screwed the pooch on this one.
You still keep calling a lot of people chanting "violent protest."
You should watch some actual video and look at actual photos of MLK protests.
."First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."
Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."
Martin Luther King, Jr.
"Letter From The Birmingham Jail"
April 16, 1963
whylol the people in this thread cheering this kind of protest on are disgusting
lol the people in this thread cheering this kind of protest on are disgusting
Fuck the entire Drumpf family
![]()
Oh, never mind then.He's right.
lol the people in this thread cheering this kind of protest on are disgusting
lol the people in this thread cheering this kind of protest on are disgusting
He's right.
lol the people in this thread cheering this kind of protest on are disgusting
From what I've learned from this entire thread and every single other thread like it: Having black people in it.What is 'this kind' of protesting?