I think things like this will help him in the general. More Americans dislike the censoring of free speech by bullying than you would think.
I think things like this will help him in the general. More Americans dislike the censoring of free speech by bullying than you would think.
So they should give up their first amendment right and should allow Trump to have his? That makes no sense.
I'm sure there's more than one location to hold speeches.
Again, answer me this: If Trump supporters stormed Clinton rallies, making it impossible for Hillary to talk, would you be okay with that?
Just to make sure: I'm no Trump supporter (Bernie would get my vote, if I was an US-citizen), but I hold the right to free speech very dear. Let everybody speak, so everybody can hear it, then pick it apart if that's reasonable.
I think things like this will help him in the general. More Americans dislike the censoring of free speech by bullying than you would think.
You're right, I don't know your history that much;
No, they forced him to cancel his speech.
The government didn't stop Trump's rally. He still has his freedom of speech. Trump cancelled his own rally, so no but Trump prevented Trump from speaking.I'm sure there's more than one location to hold speeches.
Again, answer me this: If Drumpf supporters stormed Clinton rallies, making it impossible for Hillary to talk, would you be okay with that?
Just to make sure: I'm no Drumpf supporter (Bernie would get my vote, if I was an US-citizen), but I hold the right to free speech very dear. Let everybody speak, so everybody can hear it, then pick it apart if that's reasonable.
I'm sure there's more than one location to hold speeches.
Again, answer me this: If Trump supporters stormed Clinton rallies, making it impossible for Hillary to talk, would you be okay with that?
Just to make sure: I'm no Trump supporter (Bernie would get my vote, if I was an US-citizen), but I hold the right to free speech very dear. Let everybody speak, so everybody can hear it, then pick it apart if that's reasonable.
I don't understand how people are still making the argument that the protesters stepped on Trumps First Amendment rights. Ignoring the fact that the first amendment is protection from the government, not everyday people, the protesters have the same first amendment right as Trump. They have the same right to have their voices heard and to give their message out, Trump doesn't have more of a right just because he is a presidential candidate.
This dude still won't admit that Trump encourages violence at his rallies..Great, I'm glad that's been settled.
I'm sure there's more than one location to hold speeches.
Again, answer me this: If Trump supporters stormed Clinton rallies, making it impossible for Hillary to talk, would you be okay with that?
No, they forced him to cancel his speech.
Because they're just dumb. They obviously don't know anything about history.I don't understand how people are still making the argument that the protesters stepped on Trumps First Amendment rights. Ignoring the fact that the first amendment is protection from the government, not everyday people, the protesters have the same first amendment right as Trump. They have the same right to have their voices heard and to give their message out, Trump doesn't have more of a right just because he is a presidential candidate.
You keep saying those words, I really don't think you know what they mean.
By this point thug may as well just be a racial slur.
Thug has been a racist slur for a long time already.
I'm sure there's more than one location to hold speeches.
Again, answer me this: If Trump supporters stormed Clinton rallies, making it impossible for Hillary to talk, would you be okay with that?
Just to make sure: I'm no Trump supporter (Bernie would get my vote, if I was an US-citizen), but I hold the right to free speech very dear. Let everybody speak, so everybody can hear it, then pick it apart if that's reasonable.
The government didn't stop Trump's rally. He still has his freedom of speech. Trump cancelled his own rally, so no but Trump prevented Trump from speaking..
Yes.
Someone make a goddamn PSA thread(and sticky it) educating people on what free speech in the US is, good fucking god.
A proper tea and crumpet protest..of course.Can't believe I see some people on this thread shitting on the protesting. How do you think there has ever been any change? You think people are supposed to quietly sit by?
Hell this country was founded on actual violent protesting.
Funny that as soon as others confront them with free speech they shrink into a corner and say their free speech is censored when it wasn't it was just overridden by louder voices they could never hope to match.
Can't believe I see some people on this thread shitting on the protesting. How do you think there has ever been any change? You think people are supposed to quietly sit by?
Hell this country was founded on actual violent protesting.
and violence, your forgetting that one. If it was just people yelling at each other, than so be it. Not when thousands of protesters show up, while quite a few of them are ready to fistfight.
Had Trump not cancelled his rally and his supporters and the masses of protesters had hurt each other to the hundreds, would you have criticized Trump for that? That's what I'm trying to point out: Trump had 2 options and I feel like you would have criticized him for either.
And then you're told to wait until after he's elected to voice concern, since I guess everyone's got the right to run for president to completion without pushback for some reason?Alright so based on the last year, I wanna make sure I know how NOT to protest, especially involving black people:
1) Don't express a generation of community rage via riot - Alright, fair enough
2) Don't block highways to make your voice heard - I mean, it's not that bad
3) Don't Interrupt a speaking engagement by a presidential candidate - Now you're getting ridiculous
4) Don't organize a peaceful community protest around and outside of a huge presidential rally - WTF CAN YOU DO?
Seriously if it was in any question before now, forget it, these people... the people who try to tell you how to protest as if they give a shit about you, nothing will ever be good enough for them. If you did everything exactly as they said you should there would still be a problem.
Anyway, great job Chicago.
When the "philosophical" meaning is born out of ignorance and used to downplay the importance of people's right to protest, then yeah, I'm gonna think it's a travesty."Free speech" has a legal and philosophical meaning in the United States. That people conflate the two isn't some travesty.
Had Drumpf not cancelled his rally and his supporters and the masses of protesters had hurt each other to the hundreds, would you have criticized Drumpf for that? That's what I'm trying to point out: Drumpf had 2 options and I feel like you would have criticized him for either.
Then I admit I do not understand the American concept of free speech. If everybody talks over each other, free speech is worthless.
This only makes Trump stronger, by using these tactics and shutting down a rally. Free speech, sure. It's just overriding someone else's free speech.
I don't know about the first amendment, but as I said before in this thread: It is in bad taste to drown Trump's right to free speech in their free speech. Some said "nobody sabotaged Trump, he decided to cancel his event on his own". But he did so to prevent violent outbreaks. Had he not canceled his event and there were hundreds of hurt people, you'd hold it against him, too.
The best way to deal with bad people is to let them talk and then reply to them, have discussions with them and call them out on their bs. Unfortunately, something similar is currently happening in Germany. Instead of cool-headedly revealing the AfD's bs, even high-ranking politicians call them and their supporters "Nazi", which only strengthens them (AfD = new rightwing party)
Had Trump not cancelled his rally and his supporters and the masses of protesters had hurt each other to the hundreds, would you have criticized Trump for that? That's what I'm trying to point out: Trump had 2 options and I feel like you would have criticized him for either.
Then I admit I do not understand the American concept of free speech. If everybody talks over each other, free speech is worthless.
It's Trump's fault that the protest happened in the first place, he deserves to be criticized regardless. If Trump wasn't a walking piece of garbage in a suit he wouldn't have masses of people protesting him.Had Trump not cancelled his rally and his supporters and the masses of protesters had hurt each other to the hundreds, would you have criticized Trump for that? That's what I'm trying to point out: Trump had 2 options and I feel like you would have criticized him for either.
Then I admit I do not understand the American concept of free speech. If everybody talks over each other, free speech is worthless.
and violence, your forgetting that one. If it was just people yelling at each other, than so be it. Not when thousands of protesters show up, while quite a few of them are ready to fistfight.
This as well.5 people were arrested last night, out of thousands. So much violence.
Can't believe I see some people on this thread shitting on the protesting. How do you think there has ever been any change? You think people are supposed to quietly sit by?
Hell this country was founded on actual violent protesting.
"Free speech" has a legal and philosophical meaning in the United States. That people conflate the two isn't some travesty.
Unfortunately violent protesting only breeds more hate. There is no better way to have a message ignored, if there was any message to be heard.
Once again, his freedom of speech was not violated. Read what freedom of speech is in the US and then you can comment on it. You clearly don't know what it is.
You guys are upset about "free speech" being "taken away" from a man who was immediately interviewed live on all three major news cable networks. Who then complained on Twitter. LOL
WHAT VIOLENT PROTEST. You can count the amount of people arrested on your hands.Unfortunately violent protesting only breeds more hate. There is no better way to have a message ignored, if there was any message to be heard.
Yes. HE caused this shit. He's encouraging it. He says fight harder. I'd find quotes, but you'll ignore them..again. Your point is to defend Trump..again. Just like in the thread with the man that got elbowed by a Trump supporter.Had Trump not cancelled his rally and his supporters and the masses of protesters had hurt each other to the hundreds, would you have criticized Trump for that?
Yes, apparently. I guess I'm looking at it from a German point of view. When right wing idiots are having a rally, counter-rallies happen by the people protesting. But these counter-rallies happen in other locations and have to be registered beforehand, so that the police can ensure everybody's safety. Everybody gets to express his right to free speech, nothing is drowned in both sides shouting over each other. I think that's a more reasonable way to get your word out in the world.
Unfortunately violent protesting only breeds more hate. There is no better way to have a message ignored, if there was any message to be heard.
You have a right to speak, not a right to be heard.Then I admit I do not understand the American concept of free speech. If everybody talks over each other, free speech is worthless.
Yes, apparently. I guess I'm looking at it from a German point of view. When right wing idiots are having a rally, counter-rallies happen by the people protesting. But these counter-rallies happen in other locations and have to be registered beforehand, so that the police can ensure everybody's safety. Everybody gets to express his right to free speech, nothing is drowned in both sides shouting over each other. I think that's a more reasonable way to get your word out in the world.
Unfortunately violent protesting only breeds more hate. There is no better way to have a message ignored, if there was any message to be heard.