Yeah NY is going to be ugly, in general we like Hillary she was a good senator. It's going to be fun watching my county come in since she's lives here.
Can somebody tell me why Bernie is predicted to win by loads in Hawaii and Alaska? I saw a good argument as to why he won't in Hawaii but lost it.
Can somebody tell me why Bernie is predicted to win by loads in Hawaii and Alaska? I saw a good argument as to why he won't in Hawaii but lost it.
Alaska's basically "Nebraska by sea". As for Hawaii, no idea.
The argument I've seen online is that she lost it very badly in 2008 (but when you consider who her opponent was you might say that doesn't have much chance of recurring) and Tulsi Gabbard.
Alaska nobody knows. Pure guesswork.
Thanks. I'm hoping she clinches Hawaii on the the 26th at least, Washington doesn't seem to good for her.
Washington may well be a very good night for Sanders at this point. I would say it will help him shrink his delegate deficit.
Washington may well be a very good night for Sanders at this point. I would say it will help him shrink his delegate deficit.
Nothing is impossible ~ David bowie
It'll be his last big win, and even 60/40 will only close the delegate lead she has by 20. But yeah it should be a good night for him, won't change anything of course.
Hes going to have a decent stretch, but its too little too late.
The stuff coming out of of Bernie's campaign is basically the "the voters out there in the southern states aren't as informed/are ignorant of Bernie"
Planet Earth is blue
And there's nothing I can do ~ David Bowie
I hope Gillibrand runs in 2024.
Trying to flip delegates from Hillary that were given to her by voters. A large majority of which have come from minority groups.
Bernies camp wants to make their votes meaningless.
We'll win the north and that should prove that even though we're still down in delegates that the supers should choose us because we have the northern momentum, the south doesn’t matter.
They won't say that but that's basically what it is
Planet Earth is blue
And there's nothing I can do ~ David Bowie
I mean the move feels gross to me, too, but I'm not sure how that's related to what you were insinuating.
I mean okay. I'm not seeing it. But I understand where it's coming from now.
But I'm really not seeing it at all.
It hasn't even been a day yet and i'm already getting tired of all outlets of social media filling up with this narrative that Clinton won the first half and now it's Bernie's time to shine. I voted for Bernie yesterday here in Illinois with the mindset that Hillary pretty much had it in the bag by that point and now it seems that the writing is on the all with all his supports looking the other way. It feels incredibly annoying, especially since most of these people are the ones spewing crap about Clinton.
It's a combo of two statements that make it.
The first is what Sanders and his supporters keep claiming: There's no more southern states, very few more states with demographics that tend to support Clinton (aka minorities) so her time is up. It's smooth sailing for Sanders. Not true but that's the claim
Second being we'll convince delegates and super delegates to support us because momentum or just because I'm the "better candidate".
Combined it becomes clear they believe his inability to even be competitive in the South shouldn't count for shit.
We'll win the north and that should prove that even though we're still down in delegates that the supers should choose us because we have the northern momentum, the south doesnt matter.
They won't say that but that's basically what it is
You know who else was King of the North?
It's more like in "true" winner-take-all (Florida, Ohio, etc.) the winner of the statewide vote wins all the delegates while in "winner-take-most" states (this is not the best description, winner-take-most is a more accurate description for the many of the earlier Super Tuesday primaries) the statewide winner takes all the at-large delegates while the winner of each congressional district takes all of the CD delegates, which means that in practice it is fairly close to winner take all unless it's super close (i.e. Missouri).
going forward:
"True" Winner Take All
Arizona
Delaware
Nebraska
Montana
New Jersey
South Dakota
Winner Take All (By CD and Statewide)
Wisconsin
Maryland
Pennyslvania*
Indiana
West Virginia
California
Winner Take All CDs, Proportional w/ WTA Threshold Statewide
Connecticut**
Winner Take Most CDs, Proportional w/ WTA Threshold Statewide
New York
Washington***
Proportional w/ a Winner Take All Threshold
Utah
Proportional w/ no threshold
Rhode Island
Oregon
New Mexico
*like in Illinois, a loophole primary, delegates are directly elected
**if a candidate gets 50% or more they take all the state's delegates, not just the at-large ones
***no WTA threshold for at-large delegates
you are pulling all this out of your butt, tho
Beat all the polls? And isn't AZ going to go Clinton because of the hispanic vote?
It's a combo of two statements that make it.
The first is what Sanders and his supporters keep claiming: There's no more southern states, very few more states with demographics that tend to support Clinton (aka minorities) so her time is up. It's smooth sailing for Sanders. Not true but that's the claim
Second being we'll convince delegates and super delegates to support us because momentum or just because I'm the "better candidate".
Combined it becomes clear they believe his inability to even be competitive in the South shouldn't count for shit.
But I thought Bernie said Money = Votes???
![]()
True winner take all: you just need the plurality statewide, even if you lose a CD or two.Coming back to this, what's the difference between True Winner takes all and Winner takes all CD and Statewide, basically the same no?
This has to be trolling.
I dunno. It's something I would've said without irony when I was 18
True winner take all: you just need the plurality statewide, even if you lose a CD or two.
The other one: you lose delegates if you lose a CD.
Yes. So if it is 5 delegates per district, and Trump wins the most votes statewide but Cruz won a district, Cruz gets 5 delegates, Trump gets the rest.Thank you, so when you get a state like Missouri where Trump pretty much won every district, it's more or less winner takes all. But if it's 50/50 in terms of district won it's a 50/50 split on the CD's?
Yes. So if it is 5 delegates per district, and Trump wins the most votes statewide but Cruz won a district, Cruz gets 5 delegates, Trump gets the rest.
Hillary is going to move closer to the center once the GE comes, blah blah
Sanders fucked up by ignoring the south, then he double down by saying the south was stupid.
Unleash your hatred
Judging by reddit, facebook etc, its sander's supporters that are.
Dont think ive seen as many supposed progressives insult minorities (especially AAs) since 2008 when Hillaryis44 folks did so.
Judging by reddit, facebook etc, its sander's supporters that are.
Dont think ive seen as many supposed progressives insult minorities (especially AAs) since 2008 when Hillaryis44 folks did so.
You know how you fight for the cause? Vote Hillary.
Yeah but they are losers
Yeah love the dog whistles"Low Information Voters"
Judging by reddit, facebook etc, its sander's supporters that are.
Dont think ive seen as many supposed progressives insult minorities (especially AAs) since 2008 when Hillaryis44 folks did so.
What's so bad about Hillary? Honest to god actual policy, not "she's establishment" or "she's a liar". What in the world makes Hillary so much worse than Sanders that it makes you want to vomit when you think of voting for her?I almost threw up.
I don't think I've seen so many so-called progressives rail against single payer health care, higher taxes, higher wages. etc as I do here.
Generalizing any incidents you've seen to sanders voters as a whole is a stupid thing to do. Lol reddit too.
I've seen idiot Hillary supporters - here, facebook, irl etc - but am not going to generalize all Hillary supporters as idiots.