Reptars Revenge
Member
What's Joel Schumacher up to these days?
What's Joel Schumacher up to these days?
He directed a few episodes of House of Cards.
I think my threshold for surprise is that 150 number. If it makes less than that this weekend, then I think I'll have misjudged the immediate potency of this narrative that's already setting in the entertainment press (Variety/THR have both already done articles solely about the RT rating, full of choice negative quotes - the negative feedback cycle is already spinning up like the Hadron Collider)
I'm already preparing the underground gaf counter-cycle. Everyone will shit on it in the next two weeks but in two years time you'll inexplicably have all these "BvS was so good" threads.
SavageLttP: Batman vs Superman: Dawn of a Masterpiece - a thread by Liquadsnake
"I cried during the first ten seconds, and then next 10 after that..."
It's sad.
Most of DC-Gaf was all confident that the movie was gonna be good...
Then we got the wind knocked out of us.
But Marvel-Gaf has comforted us after the punch landed.
![]()
I want their names.Dont think it'll take two years. There was a pretty decently sized portion of GAF that enjoyed F4. Every divisive movie has its audience, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are a crapton of threads in the next few months expressing surprise that people hated this so much.
Well, there was that one guy...I think he means the old F4, and not the new one. I honestly do not recall anyone having positive things to say about the new one.
I think he means the old F4, and not the new one. I honestly do not recall anyone having positive things to say about the new one.
I think he means the old F4, and not the new one. I honestly do not recall anyone having positive things to say about the new one.
Well, there was that one guy...
OH SHITThere was that one guy who offered to pay people to go see it who enjoyed it
What an oppressively joyless and stupid movie. And ponderous as fuck too. Snyder seems satisfied just co-opting iconic imagery from much better stories, rather than coming up with anything original. Action scenes weren't even that good. Ending was a complete mess. DC cinematic universe is still entirely salvageable though.
First 30 minutes are the best part. Wonder Woman was cool.
5/10
Jessica Alba was pretty spectacular in the previous F4 films. Very talented.
Jessica Alba was pretty spectacular in the previous F4 films. Very talented.
Don't tell that to John ByrneJessica Alba was pretty spectacular in the previous F4 films. Very talented.
[If any outlets or YouTube decide to do a small story on this, please credit the Twitter at the bottom. For any questions whatsoever, contact me there] BEFORE you decide to downvote, please hear this post out. I tried to be incredibly fair, for alternate theories, check the bottom. I did a LOT of digging to find this. This was written by a skeptical person who thinks conspiracies are idiotic, but there's proof. If you can think of an explanation other than mine, feel free to comment. I'll reply to it and we can discuss possibilities.Please note, this is also NOT an attempt to dismiss any opinions which are don't favor the DCEU. You can have your opinion, that's totally cool. But on some level, this smear campaign has to exist.
EVIDENCE Screenshots: http://imgur.com/a/FlG9B
Check it for yourself: https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=batman v superman rain&src=typd
NOTE: There are accounts that DON'T EVEN SPEAK ENGLISH that are doing this.
Tweet vs Profile: - Tweet: http://imgur.com/OJGJjXP - Profile: http://imgur.com/90xwAUE
Before you read this, just know I'm a skeptical person. I'm not a rabid fanboy or sore loser, nor do I get mad at negative buzz surrounding this movie. I defended even McWeeny. But at this point I'm starting to believe there's an anti-DC smear campaign that's completely controlled and intentional.A lot of people have said before there's a possible smear campaign against the DCEU that's possibly being controlled by someone or some organization. I was one of the people who said that's absolutely bogus. There's no proof and I thought it was just SOME DC fans being a bit too reactionary and sensitive.
However, I think I may have found evidence for it. Test this yourself if you want to on Twitter, search "batman v superman rain" and set the filter to "Live" tweets or "All" Tweets.There's a very specific comment that's clearly being botted (as someone who's pretty well-versed in hacking and a Computer Science major, I can tell you the term is called "botnetting" and judging by the scale of this, it's indeed a pretty large amount of people doing this). across many different accounts. It's meant to be some obnoxious anti-DC joke that says "Batman v Superman will be a two hour tracking shot of every DC character crying in the rain". This is no coincidence and this is DEFINITELY not just a bunch of unoriginal people copying each other's tweets for the sake of being funny. All the accounts don't seem to be linked with each other. Either this is botted, or people are writing it because of some sort of "deal" online (a lot of surveys for fake products online require that users to either post or tweet certain things so they can get their "prize"). The Tweet is TOO specific to purely be a coincidental joke and too manufactured and clustered to be uncontrolled. There might be an intentional smear campaign for DC, folks. It's not to say that every source that reports negatively on BvS is in on it, but it's a domino effect of negativity that's subtly slipping between the cracks and affecting how this movie is reported.
Like I said, I'm a skeptical person. I think of every possible explanation. Which is why I will ALSO say this:I recently spoke to Mark Hughes from Forbes. Great guy, still in discussion about the topic. According to him, these attacks are likely just a result of trolling on a MASSIVE scale. The spam-bots seem relatively low-tech and perhaps smaller in quantity than I realize they are. It's also important not to let the negativity get to everyone. 90% of online attention the film is getting, believe it or not, IS positive. It's just a very vocal minority. This could possibly be the result of "low-rent trolling." However, it's hard to say for certain. This may be a smaller part in a larger behind-the-scenes scheme some company or group of people is orchestrating. Again, we can't really say for sure what's going on here, but this is certainly worthy food for thought. I have also spoken to a couple others I can't name, but there's also a chance that this is an elaborate large-scale troll. Whoever it is, this person has resources.
I originally stated that it may be a Disney shareholder, but I have my doubts about that.
honestly who is to say what is terrio and what is goyerI am pretty sure that WB and most of the people involved in this movie did not see this coming. I mean, at the worst, they probably felt the pressure of having to cram so much into one film, but I think they really tried and likely assumed that bringing in a heck of a lot of Oscar winners + Terrio was gonna be a win.
FALSE GOD TERRIO, SRS. Dude's script was kind of a step below Man of Steel's in many ways.
Not going to go back and research specific names but the RT thread for that one went on for quite a bit because the OT was dead. it wasn't just the dude who was paying people to go see it lol
I distinctly remember people coming back and saying it wasn't bad as the reviews made it out to be, or it was good until Doom, or that they really liked aspects of it like the body horror stuff, which I do think is a legit interesting thing about it .
Warner Bros may have screwed up with Batman V Superman, but at least they gave me amazing shit like Creed and Mad Max.
All is forgiven. I just hope Suicide Squad doesn't have the same fate.
Don't tell that to John Byrne
Honestly I wonder what WB will be doing with Wonder Woman
The movie is nearly done shooting, yet Patty Jenkins gotta be feeling the heat now, and IIRC Snyder and his wife are overseeing that film as well.
they are literally locked in to the Snyder-verse because of that movie (even Suicide Squad features Batfleck iirc), whether nor not he directs Justice League. They have no choice but to continue on with this universe really.
What's Joel Schumacher up to these days?
Wat...this is a complete opposite of what I've heard. Everyone who rated it similarly to yours said the first 30 minutes is the slogfest.
Honestly I wonder what WB will be doing with Wonder Woman
The movie is nearly done shooting, yet Patty Jenkins gotta be feeling the heat now, and IIRC Snyder and his wife are overseeing that film as well. That movie HAS to work.
they are literally locked in to the Snyder-verse because of that movie (even Suicide Squad features Batfleck iirc), whether nor not he directs Justice League. They have no choice but to continue on with this universe really.
At that point they might as well can the movie and not release it, because what you just described is Josh Trank's Fantastic 4They'll cut it down to 90 minutes, excise any non essential subplots and remove all the villain's character development.
Everything now rides on Will Smith. Margot Robbie, Jared Leto, and Jai Courtney.
Well if the movie underperforms (which I can see happening if it gets really bad word of mouth) they could can Snyder.
The first form of doomsday is one if not the most generic orc creature i have ever seen. Fortunately he looks better later on
Well if the movie underperforms (which I can see happening if it gets really bad word of mouth) they could can Snyder.
LOL good oneJessica Alba was pretty spectacular in the previous F4 films. Very talented.
dumb shit
If it were just this one movie it would be an easy solution. The issue for WB is that Snyder is producing to varying degrees all of their DC movies for at least the next three years. So it's not like they're firing one director, they'd be essentially firing the creative head of their next 5 or 6 movies.
Something I never thought I'd live to see.
At that point they might as well can the movie and not release it, because what you just described is Josh Trank's Fantastic 4
If it were just this one movie it would be an easy solution. The issue for WB is that Snyder is producing to varying degrees all of their DC movies for at least the next three years. So it's not like they're firing one director, they'd be essentially firing the creative head of their next 5 or 6 movies.
Yep.If it were just this one movie it would be an easy solution. The issue for WB is that Snyder is producing to varying degrees all of their DC movies for at least the next three years. So it's not like they're firing one director, they'd be essentially firing the creative head of their next 5 or 6 movies.