Aww, poor Batfleck. He doesn't deserve this.

I hope his solo movie will be a lot better.
Can we go back to talking The Rocketeer?
![]()
I'm confused by the link, but alright. I enjoyed AoU btw.
If people come out from seeing your film and they say "It's better than thor 2 atleast" you know you fucked up big time
Been in this thread for a long time and shared a lot of laughs. Just want to say I got back from seeing it and I enjoyed it. Not great but good. 7.5/10 for me. It's certainly possible that my expectations were so low I went into a delusional state during the film, but I don't think so.
From all the shit I've given it I do have to admit, that Wonder Woman theme was fucking great.
It actually felt completely out of place because it was so heroic.
Someone needs to slap "Better than Thor 2" on that poster as well
The audience I watched it with didn't laugh, cheer or really react once through the film. Credits rolled and people got up and left in silence.
I think Thor 2 is the only Marvel CU film I haven't seen. I plan to keep it that way, looked dreadful.
I think Thor 2 is the only Marvel CU film I haven't seen. I plan to keep it that way, looked dreadful.
Hell, even TASM2 had scenes that formed a storyline that a viewer could conveivably follow from start to finish.
This is in the same league as Fantastic Four.
Hey, I'm just saying that while both films are cynically dark cashgrabs that fail both to even have a basic understanding of what makes their source material work and to even be anything remotely entertaining even when divorced completely from the IPs they're meant to be representing, at least Fant4stic is only focusing on it's own internal canon and not trying and failing to set up like 8 other goddamned movies like BvS.
Now you just need to watch Man of Steel!![]()
People here seem to be really stuck on joy being an essential part of the moviegoing experience.
You'd all probably call Faith the worst Cure album.
Thank you.
I am willing to die on the sword of "TASM2 is better" and will not rest until I've amassed a following to spread the word
is it really better than thor 2 though?
If this is a serious question, then yes it is. Better then Thor 2, Iron Man 2 and 3. On par with Captain America the First Avenger and Thor 1 in my opinion.
I just got back. Um.
This is how I feel as well.
So, a few weeks ago I went to see Gods of Egypt, because while it looked astoundingly awful, I thought it would head into so bad it's, well, if not good then at least entertaining territory. And that it was - my daughter and I had a hoot at it.
These are the ways Gods of Egypt was a better film than Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice:
Gods of Egypt was the worst big budget movie I'd ever seen at the time, but it was entertaining in spite of itself, or perhaps because of itself. It's now the second worst.
- It had a semi-coherent narrative through line
- Characters were allowed to feel a range of emotions, most notably, joy
- Characters were allowed to look like they were having fun
- It knew not to take itself too seriously
- It had better romantic tension between the main couple. Mind you, the romance was awful.
- The action was shot and edited in a way that you could tell what was going on, and where characters were in relation to one another.
- The bad guy had clear motivation and goals
More than anything, BvS: DoJ is utterly joyless. Everything progresses with funereal solemness, even when it's being silly. Everything is just so heavy handed. There's an early shot of Lex Luthor walking down a hallway from behind. It's brightly lit (which is rare), shot from a low angle, in slow motion, his lab coat flowing majestically behind him while loud, deep pounding music portends something Significant happening, though the film has had no time to build up to anything at this point. Nothing about that moment warranted the music, the slow motion, the elevation of a character walking somewhere to a major event. I burst out laughing at this scene - it was just so randomly awful. But it was one of the only times the film was so bad it was actually funny. For the most part, it's simply bad. And that's how most of the movie goes. I squirmed a lot.
Gal Gadot is the only actor allowed to look like she was enjoying herself, a bit, and her character is allowed to elevate her scenes simply with how she carries herself. She's got a deft touch, especially when Wonder Woman is doing her thing. She's the best thing about the movie, IMO. Affleck was good as Batman, and his rage and motivation was really the heart of the film. I'd love to see a stand alone Batman film with him, though with a different director. (Though of course, his Bruce Wayne was not allowed a smidgen of fun. At least Bale looked like he was enjoying himself.)
Two hours in, just when the movie has gotten its first lift of narrative momentum and we're heading into the climax, everything is literally put on hold to run a series of commercials for the future Justice League movie. Just right smack in the middle of things. At least Marvel knew to put their most overt hooks after the credits! It totally kills the forward momentum the movie had going.
The audience I watched it with didn't laugh, cheer or really react once through the film. Credits rolled and people got up and left in silence. The whole movie is a giant, joyless mess.
Thank you.
I am willing to die on the sword of "TASM2 is better" and will not rest until I've amassed a following to spread the word
We should do another round of that glorious thread a year ago or so where we collectively, without looking it up or cheating, try to remember what the plot of the Thor movies was.
That thread was fun because nobody could.
If your theater reaction is the standard, WoM is going to be BRUTAL.
There was only one moment where the audience seemed to give a shit at my viewing.Complete silence the rest of the time. No laughing, no gasping, no awing, nothing.Wonder Woman throwing up that X.
A few people perked up at the Civil War trailer, too.
Compares this to Thor 2 (yes, Thor 2) where my audience laughed at every joked and overall had a great time.
Meh, Affleck's been in lots of shitty movies. His record as a director (while small) is stellar
Before the movie started, there was a trailer for Lego Batman.
That looks like it's going to be a far better Batman movie than anything we'll get in the near future.
A lot of the criticism makes me think this is closer to Watchmen more than anything, but with a last third act that is your typical superhero movie explosion fest.I was actually ready to give this four stars until the last maybe quarter of the film. People said the first half was boring but I didn't feel that way at all. If anything it was let down primarily by having too much concentrated action and an unnecessary final fight which led to an unnecessary epilogue. If they'd dropped the final bits they could have lost 20 minutes of runtime and made the whole thing more brisk, or dedicated the extra time to fix earlier pacing issues.
3 stars after all was said and done, imo.
One of the showings near me was sold out, and there was a huge line outside for the later showing I went to.Yeah, same here. People are usually actively engaged with these movies. And this was a first showing crowd - they're usually the most enthusiastic!