AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
Bro just say tl;dr. I'm not reading all that explanation about why you didn't read someone else's other long post.
You also have to put a funny gif.

Bro just say tl;dr. I'm not reading all that explanation about why you didn't read someone else's other long post.
I'll be real sure to take that under advisement. Promise.Bro I started reading your post. Then after 10 minutes I realised it didn't end. I agree with most things you were saying, but a forum post shouldn't take this long to read.
"Gunn also alluded in a separate interview with Crew Call with Anthony D'Alessandro that the Justice Gang may also be factoring into the mysterious Superman follow-up. Without getting too much into details, Gunn stated the following":"I can say that probably the next movie we're gonna be making is the follow-up to Superman, which I don't want to get into too much detail on, but like that's what's probably the next film we're making, I think. Well, hopefully we're making The Batman 2 before that, and then I think it's [the Superman follow-up]. And then we have another TV show, which nobody knows about, which is going next. And then a lot of that other stuff is still in different stages of development.
We got The Brave and The Bold is still going well, and Wonder Woman, and Paradise Lost, and Booster [Gold.] So all those other things are still going down the road. Some of the things have changed a little bit [like] The Authority, but most of those things are all in process. But I am not going to make any of them until there is a screenplay that I'm happy with."
It's within the group of characters we've already met, and Superman's an important element of it. So, that's what I'll say, but like that movie, that treatment is done.
got a good laugh with this one.
He recently scaled back the video cadence because making a video every week was exhausting for him, especially since he has a kid now and such.Oh cool, I was wondering where the PM was for this movie.
Passed 600m:
![]()
Box Office Milestone: ‘Superman’ First Superhero Pic of Year to Fly Past $600 Million Globally
The inaugural release from James Gunn and Peter Safran's DC Studios is the top-grossing comic book movie of the year so far but can't escape kryptonite altogether as the overall genre continues to struggle.www.hollywoodreporter.com
It did it in last few days but I'm not sure exactly when. Luiz Fernando on Twitter predicts that it will do 615-620m.Wasn't passed already?
Those twitter accounts like Dextrio are so fucking terrible.
Corenswet's audition tape is making the rounds this morning:
Talented dude, but most of us already knew that from watching the movie. Also interesting to see how the interview scene evolved over time
I'm one of the people who skipped pretty much all of it except The Batman. The movies I'd watch after the theater runs (streams) just didn't hit with me like the Nolan trilogy and MCU movies. But I'll probably start going to theaters again. I liked Suicide Squad, Peacemaker, now this. Has gotten better IMO.You'd think a Superman movie would blow past $600M no problem.
Then again, check out DC's superhero films since covid. Aside from The Batman, they do lousy. Somehow even Black Adam did better than all movies except Batman, Superman and Aquaman 2. Before covid, they did way better as a whole.
List of films based on DC Comics publications - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You'd think a Superman movie would blow past $600M no problem.
Then again, check out DC's superhero films since covid. Aside from The Batman, they do lousy. Somehow even Black Adam did better than all movies except Batman, Superman and Aquaman 2. Before covid, they did way better as a whole.
List of films based on DC Comics publications - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It has Milly Alcock in a short skirt and boots in it, though ...Talk of Supergirl matching Superman seems like baseless hopium.
I suspect a lot will also depend on how well Jason Momoa is portrayed as Lobo. If they stick close to the comics and include a mix of violence, coolness, and vulgar language, it could all work. Unfortunately, with Gunn, I'm always a bit worried that coolness gets conflated too quickly with over-the-top humor.It has Milly Alcock in a short skirt and boots in it, though ...
Gunn didn't write nor direct SupergirlI suspect a lot will also depend on how well Jason Momoa is portrayed as Lobo. If they stick close to the comics and include a mix of violence, coolness, and vulgar language, it could all work. Unfortunately, with Gunn, I'm always a bit worried that coolness gets conflated too quickly with over-the-top humor.
But he's a producer on the movie and CEO and Co-Chairman of DC Studios. Besides, he was responsible for casting Jason Momoa in the role, wasn't he? So, I think it's safe to assume he had some say in the direction of the film.Gunn didn't write nor direct Supergirl
The extent of Gunn's creative input with Supergirl begins and ends with hiring a writer to adapt Woman of Tomorrow. He wasn't hovering over the shoulder of the director during the shoot, telling him to add more jokes.But he's a producer on the movie and CEO and Co-Chairman of DC Studios. Besides, he was responsible for casting Jason Momoa in the role, wasn't he? So, I think it's safe to assume he had some say in the direction of the film.
The writer of Supergirl, at least according to IMDB, is Ana Noguiera, has a whooping ONE PREVIOUS WRITING CREDIT, a short SEVEN YEARS AGO. Gunn is listed as a producer, not an executive producer, so it seems pretty safe to say that Gunn didn't hire a girl with a single writing credit, throw her a copy of the comic, sign a 150-200 million dollar check to Craig Gillespie the director, who does have a decent body of work but not a ton of "high octane" stuff, and then walk away.The extent of Gunn's creative input with Supergirl begins and ends with hiring a writer to adapt Woman of Tomorrow. He wasn't hovering over the shoulder of the director during the shoot, telling him to add more jokes.As an accomplished director himself, I'm sure he is well aware that directors don't like that kind of meddling so he's not going to do it to others.
I'm kinda curious if we will EVER see an actual hero/heroine nude. I gotta think that even Gunn can't cross that line for a topless Powergirl or Booster Gold wang, much less any of the really big ones with kid appeal. I think it's always gonna be rando extras. Hell, I don't think even The Boys has any of the actual main heroes nude, though maybe The Deep? Though there have been some almost nameless ones at times, usually male, with powers. Just seems lie an unspoken line, only crossed by Watchmenwish for a Supergirl cameo in Peacemaker S2 so we can get some supergirl bush. should have included in on the orgy in e1, even though the scene is so random and doesn't make much sense
Every writer has to start somewhere, and an adaptation of an existing story is a perfect place to start. I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, rather than assume she's being ghost written or whatever. I'm sure Gunn gave her some guidelines into adapting Woman Of Tomorrow into the overarching DCU story he's trying to tell, but that's likely the extent of it, as I said before.The writer of Supergirl, at least according to IMDB, is Ana Noguiera, has a whooping ONE PREVIOUS WRITING CREDIT, a short SEVEN YEARS AGO. Gunn is listed as a producer, not an executive producer, so it seems pretty safe to say that Gunn didn't hire a girl with a single writing credit, throw her a copy of the comic, sign a 150-200 million dollar check to Craig Gillespie the director, who does have a decent body of work but not a ton of "high octane" stuff, and then walk away.
He claims he wasn't on set for most of the production and let Gillespie do his thing. Could he be lying? Sure, but as I said before, directors generally don't like producer meddling and I doubt that Gunn, an experienced director, would force that upon another.I've little doubt Gunn was INTIMATELY involved in the creation of Supergirl and I bet you will see his influence all over it.
Giant production, likely effects heavy, hundreds of millions on the line....yeah, let's get the bit actress to write it up.Every writer has to start somewhere, and an adaptation of an existing story is a perfect place to start. I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, rather than assume she's being ghost written or whatever. I'm sure Gunn gave her some guidelines into adapting Woman Of Tomorrow into the overarching DCU story he's trying to tell, but that's likely the extent of it, as I said before.
Also you made it sound like that check is for the director's salary, not the entire producton. For a second I was like holy crap, I need to be a director lol
He claims he wasn't on set for most of the production and let Gillespie do his thing. Could he be lying? Sure, but as I said before, directors generally don't like producer meddling and I doubt that Gunn, an experienced director, would force that upon another.
Anyway, the original poster I was responding to claimed that Gunn would have a hand in the direction or insert jokes, but there's no evidence that he's ever done that on a set that he wasn't directing himself. On the contrary, he's very hands-off, sometimes to a fault... like that time the Russos decided to kill off Gamora in a movie that wasn't his.
But if you think Gillespie and the writer have the freedom to turn kryptonite into nanite fluid, make the Green Lanterns an oppressive galactic police force reporting directly to Darkseid, or have Batman sending Supergirl simp DMs as a running gag throughout, I think you'd be solely mistaken (though that last bit DOES sound like a Gunn joke).
That's my point, Gunn isn't just gonna hand off a comic to some noob writer and a director he's probably never worked closely with before, who knows where they would take the story or what "later problems" they might come up with. He is INTIMATELY involved in how they interpret the story, what it will mean for later films, how the characters will mesh with other ideas he has, and if the tone will be appropriate. Hell, seems like Gunn is the reason why Mamoa is Lobo, did the director even have a say in that casting?![]()
Batman sending simp DMs to Supergirl... in Woman of Tomorrow. Right...
I'm getting the distinct impression that you have no clue what the story is even about and you're just arguing for arguments sake. You had me for a second, not gonna lie.
She's displaying her characterization from the very first pages of Woman Of Tomorrow. Gunn didn't invent drunk Supergirl, it's straight out of the damn book.The simplest way to know that Gunn is influencing Supergirl is the fact that she showed up in his film. Her characterization has already started to be established. It is not like they can make her a completely different person in her own film it would be tonally inconsistent.
This isn't true, when she's drunk in the comic she's just very cavalier and wants to be left alone, she isn't laughing like an idiot while her dog is assaulting for a cheap joke; heck she barely laughs at all in the entire run.She's displaying her characterization from the very first pages of Woman Of Tomorrow. Gunn didn't invent drunk Supergirl, it's straight out of the damn book.
Damn, must have been a hell of a cocaine bender that got that script hammered out so fast!Looks like Gunn just announced Superman 2 (Man of Tomorrow) for summer 2027.
If they are gonna do that armored suit, I really hope they do it as practical as possible instead of a 10 minute cartoon battle of them being thrown through buildings and stuff.WOW!!
![]()
Did I say he invented drunk Supergirl? No. Understand what I wrote and try not to be so condescending.She's displaying her characterization from the very first pages of Woman Of Tomorrow. Gunn didn't invent drunk Supergirl, it's straight out of the damn book.
Do you mean comics like these?:I'm begging you guys to please pick up a comic and read once in a while. It's good stuff, I promise you.
Let me break some news for you: Gunn wrote the Superman movie. Supergirl is in Superman, with actual lines and everything. Gunn wrote her. Not a comic book writer. Not whoever is working on her solo movie. Gunn. That means how she was portrayed was entirely under his influence. And, as I stated logically before, as the first introduction to the character this particular film version is going to (at least one would expect) set the tone for how she is portrayed in subsequent films, including her solo. At no point did I say or imply Gunn is ghost-writing the movie.Until Gunn's name shows up under the Writers or Story By credits, there's no reason to assume he's ghost writing or ghost directing (lol). It makes no logical sense. His name is on the Scooby Doo movies FFS, he's not one to shy from writing credits.