Dave Chappelle getting backlash for jokes about Caitlyn Jenner

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't really see how Dave saying a trans person is living a fantasy is the same as Eddie making gay jokes in his specials.
 
That's not something you can say, though. Not in 2016. It's become a sacred cow, and comedians love breaking taboo (for better and for worse).

Maybe if your only experience with trans people is what you see on talk shows and what not but we live in the real world. The norm is the opposite.
 
Firstly, the line quoted in the OP is not a joke, it's something you'd expect to hear at a GOP debate or FOX News.

Secondly, I've never known uncelestial to take things out of context in order to "push an agenda" or whatever you'd call it.

Thirdly, "what about equality" is a poor thing to say because indeed, what about equality? In society, whenever something like this comes up, it's always proposed that trans people, if they want to be equal, they need to be able to be the butt of the joke, when in fact it becomes seriously problematic for them to be the butt of the joke when they're kind of the butt of society. It'd be akin to making black jokes during Jim Crow.

You make an interesting point. My main thought process is was this meant to entice harm to those he might be offending. Was that his intention? Can't say for sure.

However I do understand that comedy does take from current events in an attempt to be "edgy". If you ask me if I could see a comedy show during the Jim crow era poking fun at the current climate I'd say yes.

But I guess where the misconception is i'd see it as a comedian like Dave poking fun at the crap he and those like him would have to deal with. While the other perception would be a comedian telling the same jokes to an all white audience with just one black person in attendance.
 
My stance on trans jokes is that I and most other trans people should be laughing with you for it to be any good. If the quotes in the Op are true than this is the farthest thing from that
 
Man this social justice stuff is getting out of control. You really can't say anything without offending some sensitive emotional social warrior.
 
i would say that richards calling audience members niggers is pretty much the same degree of bigotry as saying that trans people are just delusional about their gender

The point is that we clearly draw lines for this kind of stuff. Surely, some people defended Richards' rant as comedy.

Why not? It illustrates the difference between hateful commentary and comedy. There is a line that can indeed be crossed and that's an excellent example of when someone crosses it.

If someone wants to argue the merits of the/a joke that's one thing but the cutesy routine where people handwave a joke under the "what subjects should comedy avoid then!?" line is intellectually lazy and doesn't contribute to the discussion.
We have footage of Richards racist rant. He is directly insulting people in the audience by being racist.

We do not have footage of Chappelle's stuff. So it is hard to judge if any line is being crossed. It doesn't seem like everyone in the audience thought it was offensive - judging by some posts here in this topic also - while the Richards thing is universally seen (and rightfully so) as racist.

I think it is strange to judge this and compare it to Richards, since most of us simply haven't heard it and can't really make an opinion of it.
 
War/ISIS jokes are often made to do two things:

1. Relieve people's tensions by introducing brevity into otherwise bad situations

2. Relieve people's tensions by reducing an enemy to being a joke

Making fun of trans people isn't the same as making fun of ISIS
Dark humor is also told without relieve. Making fun of ISIS is same as making fun of trans people, in both cases you are insulting the subject. this goes to any subject, racism, russians, rape.
 
Good comedians challenge your views. Hack comedians pander to your biases. Dave is doing exactly what he should be doing: questioning popular notions and the majority opinion. Sometimes that means your sacred cows get in their crosshairs.

You don't have to agree to with a comedien to laugh at their material.

Punching down is always challenging to make work. I'd have to hear this joke to determine what I thought, but I'd say from what was posted in the OP I wouldn't find it all that clever. I mean, it's not particuarly daring to shit on the trans community.
 
Maybe if you get your rebel politics from the cover of Vanity Fair.

The mainstream-acceptable view is to hold Caitlyn Jenner up as a heroine. Television tells people to accept her.

For better or worse, the taboo is to poke fun at this.

Man, i don't know what world you live in but most people I've talked to definitely don't understand trans.

Honestly, I have a bigger problem with vanity surgeries like breast implants.
 
Was this a finished bit or was Dave trying something out or working on something?

I think the criticism is more valid if this is something that is part of a special where he had time to work on the bit and this was the finished product.

But if a comedian is working on something or trying out something new I feel like they should generally get the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes they can say something offensive and they can pull it off. But the joke doesn't start that way. It might take months for them to get there.

Without actually hearing the joke or knowing more about the situation I think I am going to reserve judgment.

Just my 2 cents. While racism or bigotry is not cool I think you still need to take things in context and I find it strange to complain about being offended when you go to see a comedy show. If the act is broad enough some of it might be offensive to pretty much everyone.
 
Good comedians challenge your views. Hack comedians pander to your biases. Dave is doing exactly what he should be doing: questioning popular notions and the majority opinion. Sometimes that means your sacred cows get in their crosshairs.

You don't have to agree to with a comedien to laugh at their material.
Yeah, I agree with this sentiment as well.
 
Dark humor is also told without relieve. Making fun of ISIS is same as making fun of trans people, in both cases you are insulting the subject.

In one case, we have a pretty horrible organization that is doing great harm to many people. In another case, we have a group of people who have no real status in society and are treated like second-class citizens. Inherently, it is not the same, because the end result is different, and unless you're a pretty horrid person, the intent is different as well.

Poor Caitlyn, a comedian made a joke about her

The "joke" was alleging that Jenner was living a fantasy. This is not a joke against Jenner, it's a joke against trans people that uses the most famous trans person as the punchline.

You make an interesting point. My main thought process is was this meant to entice harm to those he might be offending. Was that his intention? Can't say for sure.

However I do understand that comedy does take from current events in an attempt to be "edgy". If you ask me if I could see a comedy show during the Jim crow era poking fun at the current climate I'd say yes.

But I guess where the misconception is i'd see it as a comedian like Dave poking fun at the crap he and those like him would have to deal with. While the other perception would be a comedian telling the same jokes to an all white audience with just one black person in attendance.

The issue is that people in the Jim Crow era did make fun of black people, but it wasn't done from a place of mutual respect, but in fact them looking down upon the subjects of their humour. Here, it comes across as a cis person making jokes for cis people.
 
That's not something you can say, though. Not in 2016. It's become a sacred cow, and comedians love breaking taboo (for better and for worse).


Good thing comedians don't joke about race.
But they do? What?

I disagree with your assertion that transness is a sacred cow. Not while we're still passing laws to disparage then and not while they are still being killed because of their bodies.
 
Good thing comedians don't joke about race.

comedians joke about race by making fun of the ridiculousness of stereotypes and the stupidity of racists, not by saying without irony that mexicans are all lazy and blacks are stupid. you could joke about trans issues, but saying that trans people are just deluded is fucked up and wrong and not funny.
 
People laughed when he made fun of his own race but this is off limits? People are over the top.

I believe the rule is that you can *only* make fun of your own group. Gays can only mock gays, jews can only mock jews, blacks can only mock blacks. Women can only mock women.

I mean, that seems to be the accepted norm.

I also don't think he said something to the degree of "hey black people, how long are we supposed to indulge in your fantasy of equality?"
 
I probably would have laughed at it. It's gonna be hard to convince me that transgender people aren't open to being made fun of by comedians when just about everything else is.

ITT: People have differing senses of humor and are making others feel bad about it.

Telling trans people are living a fantasy isn't a joke or humour. It's simple hateful stuff. How is it that hard to understand?
 
Dude is a known transphobe. Look at his comments here (linked in OP) or way back in 2010. Fuck that shit. That's indefensible.

this thread says:
"it's kind of silly to get selectively pissed at individual insults."

If these "insults" were aimed at a relatively less marginalized group like Jews or even cis gays the reaction would be a hell of a lot more critical. But as we see often it's strangely easy for many (mostly cis) people to explain away unbridled intolerance of trans folk. Denying the legitimacy of someone's identity in front of thousands at a time when American trans people are struggling to be taken seriously as valid human beings worthy of respect? Hey, lighten up, it's comedy! Why so uptight?

And then there's the fact that his quoted material is only potentially "humorous" if you share his fucked-up disdain for transfolk.

Anyway, this is totally a drive-by. I can't deal with a debate on something that should be self-evident to anyone with empathy.
 
comedians joke about race by making fun of the ridiculousness of stereotypes and the stupidity of racists, not by saying without irony that mexicans are all lazy and blacks are stupid. you could joke about trans issues, but saying that trans people are just deluded is fucked up and wrong and not funny.

Oh that's what Artie Lange and Gilbert Gottfried do when they make race jokes?
 
In one case, we have a pretty horrible organization that is doing great harm to many people. In another case, we have a group of people who have no real status in society and are treated like second-class citizens. Inherently, it is not the same, because the end result is different, and unless you're a pretty horrid person, the intent is different as well.

And what is the end result then? When you are the insulted party, it might feel like that. Just because the subject is a horrible organization or a humble person, doesn't take away from the joke.

This is like saying making fun of Hitler is the same as making fun of black people.

so the joke is more righteous because the subject is worse human being? that is debatable.
 
So everyone outraged here has actually heard the joke?
I want to hear the joke to make up my own mind.

he's been telling this joke for more than a year now. I heard it live when I saw him last october. It's not his best joke, but in general he's even more hilarious than ever. At least to me.

As a comic, dave was always pushing the envelope of what's okay to say and not to say. And his humor is very much in the vein of the heteronormative male perspective. the way he delivered it as I heard it was an "I'm a relic of an older time" type of thing. That he can't keep up with this newer age of gender relations and sexual identities, so he feels like a fish out of water. He throws in a disclaimer before he tells the joke that he's "cool with people being whoever they want to be and living their truth, just don't expect him to play along on a personal level," or something to that general effect.

There is without a doubt an edge of transphobia to the joke, and Dave leans into it fully on purpose. He's done it plenty of times for a bunch of other sensitive topics like misogyny, race relations, and homosexuality. I'm not surprised that he offended people: they're purposefully offensive jokes and he utilizes the aura like a prop. If he's been telling that joke for this long, that means it's landing more often than not. And as with the perhaps ulterior reasons people laughed at some of his jokes on the Chappelle Show, this joke's success is most likely an unsavory reflection of the audience who is reacting to it.
 
Maybe if your only experience with trans people is what you see on talk shows and what not but we live in the real world. The norm is the opposite.
In any public sphere today that isn't hard right, if you say something transphobic, you will be eaten for it. You might as well drop an n-bomb.

But they do? What?
Your sarcasm detector is busted.
 
People laughed when he made fun of his own race but this is off limits? People are over the top.

People still laughed and people are going to laugh, even if the world becomes "too PC". You cannot force a type of sense of humor on anyone. People find things funny, even when others don't. You can tell the most racist black joke you can think of to a group of 200 black people and at least 10 of them will laugh. Dave told a trans joke, even if it were a "safe" trans joke, you'd have a large group calling it transphobic (a phrase I can't stand only because phobia = fear, not a ignorance of or melancholy feel toward), and a group equally as large finding it funny.
 
'Dat context. So are we still going to say that Chappelle was just being edgy and not, y'know, bigoted?

And what is the end result then? When you are the insulted party, it might feel like that. Just because the subject is a horrible organization or a humble person, doesn't take away from the joke.

Literally can't even relay to you the difference between a terrorist organization and a marginalized group of people.

A joke made about trans people is a joke made at the expense of a people who are in a bad situation. Thus, the end result is that a group that's already the butt of society is made the butt once again.

A joke made about ISIS is a joke made at the expense of people who are marginalizing people. Thus, the end result is that a group that is doing harm to people, intentionally and willfully doing harm, is made the butt of society, and only through the fact that they are wrongdoers.

so the joke is more righteous because the subject is worse human being? that is debatable.

You remind me of myself when I left high school - asking the tough questions. Unfortunately for past me, none of them were good questions.
 
Good comedians challenge your views. Hack comedians pander to your biases. Dave is doing exactly what he should be doing: questioning popular notions and the majority opinion. Sometimes that means your sacred cows get in their crosshairs.

You don't have to agree to with a comedien to laugh at their material.

Saying a trans individual is living a fantasy isn't challenging my viewpoints, it's just bigoted.

Man this social justice stuff is getting out of control. You really can't say anything without offending some sensitive emotional social warrior.

I can't tell which comments are real anymore.
 
It's interesting that "minority comedy", for lack of a better terms, and its reception is highly dependent on who's telling it and if they're part of the group being joked about. A black guy making a black joke is fine, but a white guy making one and you might have some problems. I guess it has to do with whether something is seen as being bigoted/phobic, or seen as self reflection on the fucked up stuff that has to be dealt with.

I myself, as a black dude, acknowledge that even for the exact same joke, I'd be more comfortable hearing it from a black comedian than one of another race if it was a "black joke"

I also read a comment in here that this would be akin to making jokes about black people during Jim Crow. But I have no doubt that black people made black jokes during that era. However if a white person made one, even if he had always been super supportive of black rights, and condemned the laws? Hmmm...
 
According to the OP he said trans people are living a fantasy. Great job trying to downplay the bigotry though.

Thing is, people are just going off an OP.
I think most here haven't actually seen/heard the joke.

he's been telling this joke for more than a year now. I heard it live when I saw him last october. It's not his best joke, but in general he's even more hilarious than ever. At least to me.

As a comic, dave was always pushing the envelope of what's okay to say and not to say. And his humor is very much in the vein of the heteronormative male perspective. the way he delivered it as I heard it was an "I'm a relic of an older time" type of thing. That he can't keep up with this newer age of gender relations and sexual identities, so he feels like a fish out of water. He throws in a disclaimer before he tells the joke that he's "cool with people being whoever they want to be and living their truth, just don't expect him to play along on a personal level," or something to that general effect.

There is without a doubt an edge of transphobia to the joke, and Dave leans into it fully on purpose. He's done it plenty of times for a bunch of other sensitive topics like misogyny, race relations, and homosexuality. I'm not surprised that he offended people: they're purposefully offensive jokes and he utilizes the aura like a prop. If he's been telling that joke for this long, that means it's landing more often than not. And as with the perhaps ulterior reasons people laughed at some of his jokes on the Chappelle Show, this joke's success is most likely an unsavory reflection of the audience who is reacting to it.

Now I really wanna hear the joke. :|
There needs to be a comedy special of his new routine.
 
Comedians get backlash all the time for jokes. They either hit or they don't.

Seems like a non-story. Which is my I needed to post in a non-story thread.
 
And what is the end result then? When you are the insulted party, it might feel like that. Just because the subject is a horrible organization or a humble person, doesn't take away from the joke.

so the joke is more righteous because the subject is worse human being? that is debatable.
Uh, yes? Making fun of a horrible human being (Or organization) is obviously different from making fun of a minority group.

That should be fucking obvious. It's like asking why the Three Stooges shorts with racist portrayals of black people are less fondly remembered than the ones laughing at the Nazis.
 
he's been telling this joke for more than a year now. I heard it live when I saw him last october. It's not his best joke, but in general he's even more hilarious than ever. At least to me.

As a comic, dave was always pushing the envelope of what's okay to say and not to say. And his humor is very much in the vein of the heteronormative male perspective. the way he delivered it as I heard it was an "I'm a relic of an older time" type of thing. That he can't keep up with this newer age of gender relations and sexual identities, so he feels like a fish out of water. He throws in a disclaimer before he tells the joke that he's "cool with people being whoever they want to be and living their truth, just don't expect him to play along on a personal level," or something to that general effect.

There is without a doubt an edge of transphobia to the joke, and Dave leans into it fully on purpose. He's done it plenty of times for a bunch of other sensitive topics like misogyny, race relations, and homosexuality. I'm not surprised that he offended people: they're purposefully offensive jokes and he utilizes the aura like a prop. If he's been telling that joke for this long, that means it's landing more often than not. And as with the perhaps ulterior reasons people laughed at some of his jokes on the Chappelle Show, this joke's success is most likely an unsavory reflection of the audience who is reacting to it.

Appreciate the context.
 
Were the jokes something along the line of "Trans person over in the corner got too drunk and collapsed and I was like "Is he okay?" and the paramedics stopped CPR to go "It's SHE you jackass." Kind of like a Bill Hicks bit about screwed up priorities, or was it more "Trans people are weird, that's so funny." kind of stuff?

Caitlyn Jenner doesn't deserve to be targeted for mockery because she's trans. She deserves to be targeted because she's an awful person, and the jokes should be about her being an awful person, not about an oppressed minority group that has entire states making laws against them or trying to incentivise people to hunt them for sport.
 
Dude is a known transphobe. Look at his comments here (linked in OP) or way back in 2010. Fuck that shit. That's indefensible.

this thread says:
"it's kind of silly to get selectively pissed at individual insults."

If these "insults" were aimed at a relatively less marginalized group like Jews or even cis gays the reaction would be a hell of a lot more critical. But as we see often it's strangely easy for many (mostly cis) people to explain away unbridled intolerance of trans folk. Denying the legitimacy of someone's identity in front of thousands at a time when American trans people are struggling to be taken seriously as valid human beings worthy of respect? Hey, lighten up, it's comedy! Why so uptight?

And then there's the fact that his quoted material is only potentially "humorous" if you share his fucked-up disdain for transfolk.

Anyway, this is totally a drive-by. I can't deal with a debate on something that should be self-evident to anyone with empathy.

Quoting, as it gives valuable context and establishes Chappelle as having said some pretty meanspirited things about trans people in the past.
 
The issue is that people in the Jim Crow era did make fun of black people, but it wasn't done from a place of mutual respect, but in fact them looking down upon the subjects of their humour. Here, it comes across as a cis person making jokes for cis people.

Not to get completely off topic but.. You know what Nevermind

Also just reread the OP.. Seems like defending this particular comedian is a wasted effort since he does actually feel this way.
 
He's been doing this same routine since I saw him last year. He had much funnier bits than the Jenner one but he openly admits he's being racist and bigoted so not much point in trying to argue to the contrary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom