Reminds me of this:
![]()
HAHAHAHAHA, this is amazing.
Reminds me of this:
![]()
Are we even still talking about the character's changes anymore?
How far off topic have we come........
OT but somewhat related, Overwatch's Tracer had a "sexy" victory pose that the community forced to remove
http://www.allgamesdelta.net/2016/03/blizzard-to-remove-tracer-pose-from.html
![]()
I like the character(but i don't care about the game) and i think it's probably for the good, but the fact that the pose had to be removed because:
"She's Fast.
She's Silly.
She's Kind.
She's a good Friend."
etc it's just bullshit imo, why can't a good, fast, silly, kind person be or desire to be sexy(not that i find that pose sexy though)? It's like passing from a bad stereotype to another bad one.
Are we even still talking about the character's changes anymore?
How far off topic have we come........
Topics are bound to change, just like a pair of underwear.
Talk about cutting off the nose to spite the face. Granny panties aren't going to do shit to placate SJW's who had their eye on this. They will instead write their outrage blog posts and articles about why the character is in a thigh high dress in the first place, or has to be saved/protected by the male cast. That's not even getting into the mage/witch character.
That bonus picture is both disheartening and hilarious.
I understand their frustration but some of these comments are crazy. At the end of the day, it's a piece of cloth on a video game character. It seems like such a minor change, I'm surprised it was even brought up. I have a hard time believing that people could really care about the barely visible underwear a clothed character is wearing.
It's like people complaining about Tracer's pose in Overwatch, or the petting being removed from the new Fire Emblem. I don't think anyone is really going to miss these things, but as long as they don't agree with why it was changed, they'll get hung up on principle and start throwing around words like "censorship" as if it's an inherently negative concept.
Sometimes I wonder if posts like this one are real, outraged about future imaginary outrage.
OT, I think this could be a PR move, a few people would've notice the underwear at best, and the witch character with the ridiculous bodystocking(?)/microskirt is still there.
Talk about cutting off the nose to spite the face. Granny panties aren't going to do shit to placate SJW's who had their eye on this. They will instead write their outrage blog posts and articles about why the character is in a thigh high dress in the first place, or has to be saved/protected by the male cast. That's not even getting into the mage/witch character.
It all Depends on the point of view I guess
Being for social justice is terrible. All those that are for equality and fair representation of all people should be shamed.
Huh? They basically said straight out (same with that DoAX3 twitter reply) they're making these changes (and not releasing the game) to avoid western outrage. Don't really know how you can read anything else into the statements these JP developers are making on the subject. I'd actually be interested in hearing your take on it as you apparently feel they're not talking about "future imaginary outrage".
You really think this is some kind of ingenious conspiracy?This smells like a new PR technique for Japanese publishers
Being for social justice is terrible. All those that are for equality and fair representation of all people should be shamed.
Talk about cutting off the nose to spite the face. Granny panties aren't going to do shit to placate SJW's who had their eye on this. They will instead write their outrage blog posts and articles about why the character is in a thigh high dress in the first place, or has to be saved/protected by the male cast. That's not even getting into the mage/witch character.
Evidently people are conspiring to conjure up a conspiracy.You really think this is some kind of ingenious conspiracy?
You really think this is some kind of ingenious conspiracy?
In the mean time, how about those panty machines?
A SO 5 thread with more than 20 pages. Finally lol
A SO 5 thread with more than 20 pages. Finally lol
It's kind of a conspiracy when some people make a secret plan with the intent to manipulate the public through lies.It's not really conspiracy nor it is ingenious. People on the internet are usually easy to influence. I mean a longer skirt lead to a 20+ page thread. Whether people are against or for it ti will spread across social media and is free publicity for a game a huge chunk of gamers probably didn't care in the first place.
Criticism is not outrage, simple as that.
Ya, SJW is pretty much a slur at this point. I mean, if you think that someone might be misguided/hyperbolic in their argument/discussion of a particular social justice issue, then be specific in pointing that instance out, rather than painting everyone that is for social justice under an extremely large brush, which is what the term SJW does. using SJW as a disparaging term tells me you're doing the latter rather than the former and says a lot more about you than it does about them.
Being for social justice is terrible. All those that are for equality and fair representation of all people should be shamed.
Yeah, whenever I see the term SJW used unironically, it's a reliable red flag to just ignore everything that follows.
Yeah, whenever I see the term SJW used unironically, it's a reliable red flag to just ignore everything that follows.
A SO 5 thread with more than 20 pages. Finally lol
Fair enough. FWIW I use outrage in the intentionally hyperbolic sense to emphasize the point. Don't take everything on forums so literal.
It's kind of a conspiracy when some people make a secret plan with the intent to manipulate the public through lies.
And I don't really believe in the idea that any publicity is good publicity
In the mean time, how about those panty machines?
The way I see it is that they didn't even have to mention this in the first place. It's a minor change that changes nothing about the game but instead they got to blame the western audience for it. They are stirring up the pot for a reason. They could always have said we decided to alter it because it was too much revealing but instead blame an other audience for it.
It's fine if her butt is covered up with blood, though.
But that could also simply be truth behind the change. They didn't have to reveal the exact reason, but also, why shouldn't they?The way I see it is that they didn't even have to mention this in the first place. It's a minor change that changes nothing about the game but instead they got to blame the western audience for it. They are stirring up the pot for a reason. They could always have said we decided to alter it because it was too much revealing but instead blame an other audience for it.
Well only the western version is being changed so of course they brought that up.
From fat guys playing DDR most likely. Easy cash.Used panty machines.
Did you not read the very first post
It's in the VERY FIRST LINE even
In a 2015 World Economic Forum study on gender equality, Japan was ranked 101st out of 145 assessed countries. That's lower than Azerbaijan.
The US was ranked 28th.
The report examines four overall areas of inequality between men and women in 130 economies around the globe, over 93% of the worlds population:
Economic participation and opportunity outcomes on salaries, participation levels and access to high-skilled employment
Educational attainment outcomes on access to basic and higher level education
Political empowerment outcomes on representation in decision-making structures
Health and survival outcomes on life expectancy and sex ratio. In this case parity is not assumed, there are assumed to be less female births than male (944 female for every 1,000 males), and men are assumed to die younger. Provided that women live at least six percent longer than men parity is assumed, if it is less than six percent it counts as a gender gap.
Thirteen out of the fourteen variables used to create the index are from publicly available "hard data" indicators from international organizations, such as the International Labour Organization, the United Nations Development Programme and the World Health Organization.
Japan is pretty crazy when it comes to women, that's for sure. You need to be a woman living there to see how far they go on their treatment. Net stories don't even begin to show what is like.With how horribly the Japanese society still treats women in general, who really gives a fuck about them getting fewer games that don't have such pathetic pandering & objectifying of women?
But that could also simply be truth behind the change. They didn't have to reveal the exact reason, but also, why shouldn't they?
Well the people who asked what happened to the panties probably care about the why.Because no one cares about this outside of people wanting to throw an internet tantrum? Why does it changes anything with the game that a skirt is longer? If you were planning to get the game this really doesn't change a thing. It's nothing worthwhile and has been happening in games for a while. Sprites were altered since like SNES games because they were too revealing or religious and no one threw a fit over those.
But for a few month now this has been a hot topic. With all that has happened with Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian it's really easy to rile up a controversy.