recklesscognition
Member
Waiting till they announce the PSVRNX4K
games released after this new model is out will run like total garbage on the original.
So, is Sony going to send me a complimentary 25th anniversary PS4K?
:/
but hasn't it been proven that they were working on Move (and in wand form) back in the EyeToy days before Wii was even a thing? and working on VR shortly after the inception of Move, via 2 x Moves taped to the Sony HMD?
No one said a full gen leap. God of War 1 looked significantly better in 480p on the PS2 revision than it did on a regular PS2, but it didn't look like a generational leap better.Feeling really iffy about the "significant" line. God of War 4 on PS4K looking like a full gen leap above the game on the original PS4 would cause a lot of uproar from original PS4 owners.
A few improvements and more stability is fine, but anticipated games being made for the PS4K and then essentially down ported to PS4? Wasn't expecting that so soon (If true).
This generation will be 3+ years old by the time this thing launches.
this may be true , but it would be nice if we can get an upgrade plugin for say, half the cost.I'm sure that would ease alot of minds. Will be interesting to see how they work this out.It's understandable that current owners are apprehensive about this news. But personally, I think it's a bit premature to assume that this automatically means that the base PS4 will become the poor man's edition of the platform. Depending on how this actually plays out, it could just as likely go the other way where early adopters of the 4K edition wind up looking like a bunch of rubes who are eager to jump on board the hype train to pay for overpriced new hardware that mostly goes ignored by devs. When assessing the long term impact of this kind of move, it could go well, it could go poorly, or it could just wind up being a pretty neutral thing wherein it's good for people who want the 4K features, but people who don't can still sleep well knowing that they don't really need to upgrade.
To sum that up in one sentence, I'm going to need some PS4 vs. PS4K comparisons of real software before I know how to react to this.
I would laugh so hard if this was all just a April fools joke.
Now that I think about this more, I think I may just sell my PS4 and wait 3 or so more years, get a PS5.
bunch of GoW related tweets happening over at https://twitter.com/nerd_leaks right now.
The reactions in this thread have been absolutely spectacular. The amount of emotional, irrational anger is something special. I understand a certain level of wariness to the approach, but the "Fuck you Sony" and "Sony is ruining consoles" stuff is amazing.
Surely Nintendo will never release iterative hardware. I mean the New Nintendo 3DS and Gameboy Color never happened.
Sure, but as far as the apprehensive consumers, it's totally reasonable.I think I've made two posts, but yes, I did say insular in both because it's been a common theme in what I've read. I'm not telling people to simply accept ps4k as some great thing, what I am saying is that we've already seen market trends accept product shifts like this before, and eagerly. That's why I said insular, because of the assumption the market will abandon or crush this because they're not happy with the idea is silly. We've got market trends showing otherwise.
It would obviously be a new paradigm, but your previous post transitioned from criticizing the community as insular to directly talking about the romanticism of a new paradigm.Regarding my comment on a new paradigm, that's what this is. All the console makers are looking at this, and it's possibly to be handled differently by each of them. Sony apparently intends to use the exact same architecture, with enhanced hardware, which remains to be seen how that will impact existing consumers. That's still a new paradigm, whether you're happy about it or not. I'm not dismissing anyone. Please read my posts more carefully if you're going to give me crap.
It's understandable that current owners are apprehensive about this news. But personally, I think it's a bit premature to assume that this automatically means that the base PS4 will become the poor man's edition of the platform. Depending on how this actually plays out, it could just as likely go the other way where early adopters of the 4K edition wind up looking like a bunch of rubes who are eager to jump on board the hype train to pay for overpriced new hardware that mostly goes ignored by devs. When assessing the long term impact of this kind of move, it could go well, it could go poorly, or it could just wind up being a pretty neutral thing wherein it's good for people who want the 4K features, but people who don't can still sleep well knowing that they don't really need to upgrade.
To sum that up in one sentence, I'm going to need some PS4 vs. PS4K comparisons of real software before I know how to react to this.
No way. It does not make any sense in this case.
I'm with you. The Q1 date does not sound right to me. Especially to launch new hardware in, though I guess it could work if they are planning on coinciding with tax returns for potential upgrades?
Still that would hurt Holiday Q4 sales.
Something doesn't sound right there.
Either scenario is pretty shitty which is basically why I'm not excited about this at all.
Have the PS4K at $399 with a $100 worth trade-in with the old PS4 and I'll buy it.
im tellin' ya. The PS4K is a decision made by sony as a whole to push 4k media that will benefit the entire company. This is not just a decision made by sony to have a more powerful video game console.
In the world where the PS4K does not exist:
Games are released for OG PS4, but they're highly downgraded versions of PC games, or if they're exclusives they're downgraded from the original assets / vision in order to optimise the game and get it to run on weak hardware with a poor CPU.
In the world where the PS4K exists:
Games are released for OG PS4, but they're highly downgraded versions of PC games, or if they're exclusives they're downgraded from the original assets / vision in order to optimise the game and get it to run on weak hardware with a poor CPU, and also you also have a '4k version' for the PS4k that gets closer to that original spec / PC version.
...so what's the problem here? If you're just a PS4 owner nothing has really changed for you. You're getting the same games.
I would laugh so hard if this was all just a April fools joke.
I need $250 credit for my PS4 from Best Buy and GameStop.
We've never had this before, we need a bridge.
Oh I hear you I'm just saying its theoretically possible.
That said they won't be using 14nm architecture, of that I'm almost certain.
*Garbage in comparison but still the same as they would run now.
It was also made very clear that current games would not be getting any type of performance upgrades by being played on the system and any benefits to older games would come via patch per game and per developer.
I get that Sony wants to push 4K, but unless they convince cable/satellite/network TV stations to upgrade as well, it will never be anywhere near as popular as they hope.
The only way 4K gets penetration into a majority of homes is when EVERY TV on the market is 4K.
AMD Radeon7970 or R280X
Nvidia GTX680.
Don't compare AMD FLOPS directly to Nvidia's. Some people comparing 2X PS4 to GTX970, which is not even remotely true.
It's understandable that current owners are apprehensive about this news. But personally, I think it's a bit premature to assume that this automatically means that the base PS4 will become the poor man's edition of the platform. Depending on how this actually plays out, it could just as likely go the other way where early adopters of the 4K edition wind up looking like a bunch of rubes who are eager to jump on board the hype train to pay for overpriced new hardware that mostly goes ignored by devs. When assessing the long term impact of this kind of move, it could go well, it could go poorly, or it could just wind up being a pretty neutral thing wherein it's good for people who want the 4K features, but people who don't can still sleep well knowing that they don't really need to upgrade.
To sum that up in one sentence, I'm going to need some PS4 vs. PS4K comparisons of real software before I know how to react to this.
I highly doubt we'd see an offer that generous. I'm thinking $200 max, but even that is doubtful. Probably more like $150-$175.
Is this hinting at...GOW1 remake for ps4??
and day 1 for the PS4K.
Based on OP, PSVR will benefit from the hardware boost, but VR won't be included in the box. The biggest thing we can hope for is that the processing unit currently in the breakout box can be included in the PS4k shell, though that won't really decrease the VR footprint.