Democrat Debate 10 |CNN| Sometimes I just wanna punch you in your perfect teeth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Only as a lesser of two evils I suspect.

But my point remains, while he feels he is still in the contest he owes her nothing.

I don't believe Bernie hates Clinton at all, and I imagine his endorsement will more or less be some form of "even if we have differences in specifics, we both share the same goal of progressive policies"
 
Only as a lesser of two evils I suspect.

But my point remains, while he feels he is still in the contest he owes her nothing.

He, without a doubt, owes the DNC for giving him a platform to run his campaign.

Without the Dem platform the media and people would have ignored him as Nadar 2.0.
 
If I was the victim's family, I would have sued the boy's family as they did not properly secure the Beretta.

Or instead of that they could choose to sue Beretta so that would never happen to another kid, or at least make it harder for that happen. Unfortunately they don't have that option anymore.

Also I like that between the options of "sue the company so they can make the product safer, by for example, making it so only the owner can fire it," and "blame the boys family for how they handled an incredibly deadly weapon that even adults can accidentally hurt themselves with," you went with the blame the family option.
 
I understand or at least I've tried to but I just can't divorce murder from free will. I honestly believe people should know better and that yes there is a choice.

Ok then what about people that have adrenaline producing brain tumors that suffer from incredible rage that is 0% their problem? I get that its very counter intuitive, but all the reserach points to free will being incredibly limited if it even exists. It is obviously your "choice" what to believe but try and step back. If you want some literature I can link you.
 
I'm still not sold on what to do with the waste*

*I live near one and have worked at one of the largest government nuclear waste facilities as well as we have the first new private energy nuke reactor in decades being built here. I know a shit ton of smart people that work at both.

There's not an easy answer. I think the Yucca Mountain facility could have been a good way to handle it, but even in lieu of a nationwide solution like that storing waste at plants on-site is better than more CO2 in the air IMO
 
"Hillary, what will you say if they won't pay more"

"oh well"

He's not a party man, and good on him for that. He's going out the way he came in. Speaking on the issues that he cares about. Why should he start forging a path for Hillary when she will in all likelihood just perpetuate the system that he is raging against?

Because he would also likely perpetuate all of the country's problems because he can't unilaterally fix any of the shit he talks about on a daily basis, and he doesn't care about the down ticket?
 
He's not a party man, and good on him for that.

He's going out the way he came in. Speaking on the issues that he cares about. Why should he start forging a path for Hillary when she will in all likelihood just perpetuate the system that he is raging against?
Because he's harming progress toward his own objectives. We'll see who the Republican nominee ends up being but if someone other than Trump gets nominated and wins Sanders will be partially to blame.

He's done. It's a real long shot that he'll be nominated. Better to work on assisting efforts to pass the policies he advocates for than shit all over the only other candidate with remotely similar views.

Although he doesn't seem to have any idea of how he'll enact any of the policies he advocates.
 
Bernie is the only candidate who fully understands the danger of climate change.

Hillary's plan isn't good enough for me.

Climate change is a big fucking deal. We need someone who will be progressive on this issue. We can't wait until it is too late. We need change now.

How does Bernie combat climate change if he says no to even nuclear?
 
Bernie, you should probably not making those petulant baby faces when someone is answering a question about war and death. You've done it three times now.
 
the training and weapons programs were complete failures, though? they didnt influence anything.

Watch the PBS documentary on Assad - a place which is usually very pro-White House - to see what the people in Syria are saying, and you'll see if they influenced anything or not.

The trained soldiers and weapons ended up coorperating with Al-Nusra and ISIS.
 
This answer is so bad. WTB a Democratic presidential candidate with a reasonable foreign policy.

If only Martin O'Malley had existed and run for President.
 
You dont seem to understand my point. Science, hard science, derives from one, unifiying epistemology. Such is not the same with Economics. Plenty of different schools with different epistemologies.

And yet there is an overwhelming (95%) agreement among economists that Bernie is wrong and free trade is good for America and Americans and the rest of the world as well.
 
Bernie had a very good answer on Israel. Hillary not so much.

Hillary is looking towards the GE, Sanders is looking at his base of supporters. It's not much of a surprise. Obama did the same about Israel as Hillary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom