Blue is in an alternative universe to Green.
Likewise with Crystal being an alternative reality to Silver.
Blue is in an alternative universe to Green.
It's a problem that didn't need to be fixed. The closest example is when you were blocked from evolving Pokemon in FRLG that were in the national dex because the game was like "HURR DURR YOU DIDN'T GET THE NATIONAL DEX LOL," or how FRLG/HGSS suddenly added newer Pokemon that didn't exist in the original games. They didn't need to overexplain why M-Evos are in Hoenn.
I believe it's just an alternate timeline.Blue is in an alternative universe to Green.
They didn't do it because of mega, they did it because Game Freak have a running time line for each generation with gen 1 and gen 3 running in parallel same with Gen 4 and gen 2.
But since X and Y is stated to take place after gen 5, which took place years after gen 4 so they couldn't make it that Gen 1, gen 3 and gen 6 all ran parallel hence why they did the alternate universe.
They also did it to explain the old Pokémon being reconned to fairy, though I made up my own story to get around that, and how Mega suddenly came to be and move them out of Kalos.
Again, it's a consistency issue rather than a balance issue.
Again, it's a consistency issue rather than a balance issue.Putting aside the fact that Knock Off exists and got a massive boost recently, i'm having a hard time seeing why Game Freak couldn't give Pokémon who really need a full-on evolution from previous generations in Sun/Moon instead of what seems to be "just give them Mega evolutions", especially considering how broken some Megas are in the main campaign. I could be wrong since there's over 700 of them so I might be forgetting one but i'm having a hard time remembering any possible Pokémon with a single evolution that would become an impenetrable wall when holding Eviolite. There's no mechanical justification for them not to give, say, Dunsparce a full-on evolution.
Pretty explicitly mentioned in ORAS.Wait, alternate universes? Really?
Unlikely.Being the 20 Anniversary and all that. Will this game reach the 20m copies sold?
Alternate universe is the thing that makes the most sense for something like pokemon really.
It explains the whole 2 versions per gen to begin with!
It even explains the difference in mons availability between games.
It also even explains how trading and everything related to that works which would make no sense in universe wise.
I don't think that means that the events that happened in the old games never happened before either.
That would make the timeline reasoning they gave before utterly pointless.
There's less inconsistencies with multiverse than without.
they should have handled changing type better though.
Something like the actual pokemons don't actually change types when you import or something...
then it becomes a mess to make it work but still...
Pretty explicitly mentioned in ORAS.
I'm not sure about it being something that makes the most sense. It just comes off as a move that tries to explain so much about something that at the end of the day, is ultimately irrelevant. I mean, do we really need an in-game reason why we have two different versions? They're all the same game and journey just with different content. The same can be said of things like trading, etc. It just becomes a huge mess if you start thinking of reasons for everything to exist.
That's the thing though, now we have in universe explanation to something that made no sense before WITHOUT breaking what worked before.
White2 is still the direct sequel of White with the event of White already having happened.
You can absolutely ignore it (well not in the delta episode I guess) if you so want it.
You can ignore the Zelda timeline if you want, it's still there.
Either Maxie or Archie mention that it could have been them that went rouge in another universe during ORAS, don't they?Idk if the alternate universes really tie into multiple versions like that, it was pretty explicitly stating that earlier gens happened in an alternate universe without mega stones and stuff lol
Idk if the alternate universes really tie into multiple versions like that, it was pretty explicitly stating that earlier gens happened in an alternate universe without mega stones and stuff lol
Fat Pikachu and thin Pikachu are from different universes.
That's the thing though, now we have in universe explanation to something that made no sense before WITHOUT breaking what worked before.
White2 is still the direct sequel of White with the event of White already having happened.
You can absolutely ignore it (well not in the delta episode I guess) if you so want it.
You can ignore the Zelda timeline if you want, it's still there.
It's not like an established proven lore thing, it's a theory based off a quote from a certain character in the post game episode.Didn't play it. Never owned a GBA and had no interest in ORAS. Gotta read up on my Pokémon lore I guess.
Pretty explicitly mentioned in ORAS.
I'm not sure you can compare a sequel of a main series game to an explanation of the whole multiverse theory. White2 was meant to be a continuation to White's story, even with its new PCs and changes to Unova and its people. Whereas with the multiverse theory, you start splitting all of the Pokemon games into two groups, the group where MEvo is central to its lore, and the group where MEvo never existed. From there it starts to become a nightmare to explain differences: Are old remakes still parallel to their original games (just like the original timeline before Gen VI), or are they part of a new and self-contained universe? Is every game its own self-contained universe? Why the retcon so many new species of Pokemon each gen? Where does it start and end? Just by introducing this, you start to call so many of the inconsistencies and issues into question when no one really cared before.
The Zelda timeline has its own issues too, and has a lot in common with Pokemon. They're both trying to push a system that tries to explain everything but ends up being a very lacklustre and inconsistent way of doing so.
It's pretty much the same thing, the games are all their own self contained universe that you can only move pokemons between them.
You won't see me arguing that the split GenV/GenVI is something great, interesting, needed or whatever though.
I dunno about Gen VI starter complaints. For some odd reason people have this allergy to bipedal-ness even though they're monsters.
It was done in a tongue-in-cheek, not-really-canon sort of way though.
Fuck Zinnia and fuck Episode Delta. Easily why I consider ORAS worst of the worst.
I dunno about Gen VI starter complaints. For some odd reason people have this allergy to bipedal-ness even though they're monsters.
I don't get why they even needed to explain that the games didn't happen.Ah now I understand. I guess the concept outlined in Delta Episode is just something I can't stand behind.
But that's bullshit. Lickitung evolves into Lickilicky by leveling up with the move Rollout, and it could learn Rollout in Gen 2 via TM. Piloswine evolves into Mamoswine by leveling up with Ancient Power, and it could be bred with Ancient Power in Gen 3. Clearly those Pokemon could meet the conditions in those games without evolving.GameFreak has exclusively given new evolutions and pre evolutions conditions that couldn't be met in previous games. The idea is that when you say "Why couldn't this pokemom evolve before then?" they say "Oh it could, you just didn't meet the conditions". It's all about consistency.
Actually there's some Bs about Mt.coronent causing those evos. Which is why they never happen past 4th gen.But that's bullshit. Lickitung evolves into Lickilicky by leveling up with the move Rollout, and it could learn Rollout in Gen 2 via TM. Piloswine evolves into Mamoswine by leveling up with Ancient Power, and it could be bred with Ancient Power in Gen 3. Clearly those Pokemon could meet the conditions in those games without evolving.
Stop pretending this shit is consistent.
I'll never get the hate for Delphox, one of the best mon I've seen!
Fennekin line is majestic and the best thing to come in a long time.
There I said it!
Thank you!Actually there's some Bs about Mt.coronent causing those evos. Which is why they never happen past 4th gen.
This makes even less sense. What changed with Mt Coronet after the events of Gen 2 to cause that? Why did Mt Coronet affect far away Unova?Actually there's some Bs about Mt.coronent causing those evos. Which is why they never happen past 4th gen.
Actually there's some Bs about Mt.coronent causing those evos. Which is why they never happen past 4th gen.
We live in a sad world when this is a controversial opinion. Delphox is top tier and is sad people really seem to hate humanoid Pokemon for some reason. I think Delphox rubs people the wrong way because they saw Fennekin and they didn't think GF was going to turn a fox bipedal. I'm glad we got the foxy witch.
Braixen is the best Kalos starter too.
I'm pretty sure that's what it was too.I thought Mt Coronet was about the magnetic field thing. That's Magnezone and Probopass only
I thought Mt Coronet was about the magnetic field thing. That's Magnezone and Probopass only
Actually, I'm pretty sure the location based Evolutions have been kept pretty consistent with a magnetic field theme. Magnetzone always evolves in a sensibly magnetized (Or electrified) location.
I already accepted the fact that some things are going to be inconsistent, it's a long running videogame franchise that introduces new mechanics and explaining the absence of said mechanics in previous games is simply going to be a part of suspension of disbelief.
Being the 20 Anniversary and all that. Will this game reach the 20m copies sold?
There's nothing wrong with bipedal Pokemon but after 5 generations of bipedal fire starters in a row it just gets tiring. Braixen and Delphox are pretty awful even if you don't take that into account though.
I just want a fully evolved quadrupedal fire starter for once. I also thought having them all turn out bipedal in gen 6 was a bit much, I sort of felt that way in gen 3 too, I think Swampert looks much better on all fours. I've got nothing against bipedal pokemon though.
Plus we've never had the opposite happen. Where's my starter trio where they all turn out quadrupedal in their final form? No way that should happen with Rowlet though, yikes.![]()
I don't get why they even needed to explain that the games didn't happen.
I mean the Megas was something they clearly said they didn't know existed before so it's not a good reason and Fairy is like Steel, it's just there.
Samurott?
Also it fits with the Gen VI guys because RPG concepts.
It was meant to be tongue in cheek but fans took it as some sort of canon shit