-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Gran Turismo Sport Unveiling live stream discussion (incl. FIA Championship gameplay)
- Thread starter bombshell
- Start date
Those GIFs are NOT gameplay and neither are the videos, they are from the REPLAY mode. Who knows what actual gameplay looks like.
Didn't know that replay is not the gameplay. If those gifs are from replay. Naaah, probably from some intro or something.
The 'Ring is also the absolute worst track in sim racing for actual racing. The track is so narrow and winding that the few overtaking opportunities are fraught with danger. That race was guaranteed to be a clusterfuck from start to finish, and the last thing PD needed to do was showcase the awful collision physics every couple of minutes.
Totally baffling decision making, but also totally expected.
ReDelicious
Member
The 2 things that stuck out the most to me during that stream, was the awful tire squealing and lack of mechanical/aero damage. If the game had the latter maybe it would help discourage all the messy driving that was going on. At least half of the cars would have needed to pit for repairs (especially in the first race). Was hilarious when Kaz himself pointed out that the Nurburgring race was rough lol.
the cinematography the music it's always perfect.. it's always GT style....no matter how is looks it always has that exquisite feel.Who knows if the replay is even 60 fps, it could be 30.
Regarding graphics, I know we shouldn't judge these things in a hoover, I mean vacuum. It's obvious PSVR is taking its toll. Shit happens when you have to deliver a locked 60 fps.
And the graphic is changed because replay is 30 fps maybe? C'mon now.
I'd even add in Reiza as well into that mix.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ_XcmSJyXA
Fuck, even add in Codies while we're at it lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHrJskqCPRw
Ok. Now this looks Good again.
FM's replays are 30fps so that a lot of post-processing can be added to pretty it up. I think GT5 and 6 did it for the same reasons?
Caayn
Member
It's actually very common in racing games to increase the graphical fidelity when entering photomode or replaymode. Because a ton of resources are suddenly freed up.
Look at what DC could do at 30 fps and look at other racing games going for 60 fps. The difference is of course huge, you have twice the time to render a frame.
I'm not sure what you mean?
What? That GT5 replays are 30 fps? Or GT6? Or GTS?
That was apparent during the last posts so that's why I posted it.
Damn. There is no graphical upgrade during replays even if they are 30fps in GT's. You said : CAN BE. I said : it's not.
Bits N Pieces
Member
Big thread and don't know if it's been posted, from Videogamer.
Gran Turismo Sport beta has been cancelled
http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/gran_...an_turismo_sport_beta_has_been_cancelled.html
Gran Turismo Sport beta has been cancelled
http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/gran_...an_turismo_sport_beta_has_been_cancelled.html
Graphics Horse
Member
There's motion blur and DOF added.
flipswitch
Member
Thread worthy?
GTS Vs DC (thanks to okami11408 - GTPlanet)
Photomode or in game?
That's not a graphical changer IMO. Motion blur exists too during real gameplay.
DC shots are from Photomode, so, probably, GTS shots are from photomode too.
Christ on a bike, PD should apply for an injunction to get those videos quashed - they really bring GT's many inadequacies into sharp relief.
Mr. Crow
Member
I think 1 and 2 are from photomode.
third one is from Scale mode. (real location with GT car model)
The lighting is better in GT, but I would expect that, not convinced it's fair to compare a shot with a pre-rendered background against one with a background generated with the game engine.
That said, I want in game comparisons.
But that GTS shot in my post is background generated with the game engine. It's obvious.
StrongBlackVine
Banned
Why is this game being compared to Drive Club's graphics when it runs at twice the framerate? It had no chance of look as good...well maybe the Neo version can come close.
One has to wonder now in what state the game will be released next November... Not liking a single bit of any info i'm reading (and seeing) on this game.
StrongBlackVine
Banned
Why is this game being compared to Drive Club's graphics when it runs at twice the framerate? It had no chance of look as good...well maybe the Neo version can come close.
Someone said it was a "scape" which I understand is a photo background?
didn't stop the FM6 vs DC comparisons.
StrongBlackVine
Banned
That was dumb too.
drugstore_cowboy
Member
I'm afraid that counts for little around here, direct graphics comparisons are fair game.
Psycho_Mantis
Banned
We don't have much direct feed footage of GTS.....only clips from that poor trailer.
But you can't add such a blur when car stands. Probably is some track where you can race.
SolidSnakex
Member
If anything the fact that you can drop GTS cars into real photos and they don't look even remotely out of place just shows how spot on the the shaders are.
Might be an idea to limit comparisons until we do.....
StrongBlackVine
Banned
It should count. On the one hand we people that complain that a game is neutered if it doesn't run at 60fps(too many games to mention), but when a game does run at 60fps we talk about how crap it looks(Halo, 5, Gears 4 MP and now GT Sport).
I'm sure it is not the same people making these contrasting statements, but it just goes to show that you cannot please every one.
Caayn
Member
Psycho_Mantis
Banned
Like thats going to stop some. Jumping to conclusions is their forte.
nowheretorun
Member
I'd have to disagree with that. Motion Blur and DOF without doubt can make a game look much much better.
Even if Motion Blur does exist during real gameplay, the level of quality can make a difference imo.
Anyway, I'm just hoping that the 'only 50%' finished is referring to 'mainly' graphical, effects, physics, crash damage visuals (if any) and sound.
Fingers crossed but I have a concern this game is perhaps made on a lower budget due to unexpected lower sales of GT6 (I'm thinking Sony might be thinking this even though taking everything into account such as shafting of GT5 by closing online and also a ps4 coming out very near the same time), they have chose a more focussed direction and are 'testing the waters' so to speak with this model.
Having the Beta scrapped perhaps puts up some red flags?
SolidSnakex
Member
No? It's still going to be playable today to the public in London, next week it's going to be playable to the public at the 24h of Nurburgring. Next month it'll be at E3 and most likely Goodwood and/or Pikes Peak and so on. So they aren't hiding it. But putting together and running a beta requires a lot of resources, and those are likely better served putting toward completing the game for its November release.