Couldn't you apply that to almost any president that doesnt also preside during a majority rule by the same party?
Im already camp hillary but just saying, couldnt you say that someone shouldnt support a potential president obama because he wouldnt have the other branches to back up his visions?
With Congress in GOP hands, I'd want Obama if only to keep the GOP from:
A) rolling-back previous victories (which were hard-fought and would be difficult to re-pass through Congress); and,
B) poisoning the well for the future
Oemenia asks above who I'd rather have for President, and my answer is without hesitation Bernie over Trump. Even if he presided over gridlock for four years, I'd want the Democrat.
With a Trump win and GOP control, he'd replace Scalia, have a shot at replacing Kennedy (who turns 80 this summer), and then who knows what'd happen with Ginsburg (currently 83).
At best, we would end his first term with a young 5-4 conservative court. At worst, 6-3.
With a Bernie win, he might not move the ball forward much, but he'd prevent losses while also keeping his movement alive for the next cycle. As more and more millennials begin to participate in the process, their voices are going to come to dominate the Democratic Party. They will break-through and get their candidate, and their President will have achievements - achievements that will be challenged in court. Between 2017-2021, we're likely looking at a House GOP and the Senate flipping back-and-forth, giving the Democrat a two-year Senate majority window to pack the courts.
I want Bernie's vision to remain alive for when we nominate someone like him in the 2020s (time will fly), and I wish more folks would realize that this November is about more than just the next four years.