Polygon: Xbox Scorpio will be a ~6 TFLOP system (v PS4K's 4.14), unveil soon, Fall 17

itshappening.gif?

Wouldn't be crazy to think the RX 480 will form the basis of Scorpio's APU? A retail $199 5.5TF GPU should be able to squeeze it's way into a loss leading $399 console right?

I want even more power if they can sell a retail card at 5.5TF for $199. Make it 6+...
 
Lisa Su (AMD CEO) said that "Zen would be used in other segments such as APUs, sampling to our priority customers in the next few months and shipping next year" or something along that.
What she actually said was Zen comes to desktops first, then servers which priority samplings will be taking place in a few weeks. Then she said Zen will scale into notebook APU in the future as well as embedded devices.

That being said, i don't see why they couldn't have simultaneous development for Microsoft or any other paying customer.
 
I don't think I would be interested in this. The so called "exclusives" for xbone end up on PC pretty fast these days. This may change once/if xbox starts to take market share from playstation, I guess, but in the short term people who own capable gaming PCs don't need this console imo.

I have a 2xTitan X Water Cooled PC and still love playing my Consoles (Xbox One/PS4). My PC handles many games at 4k/60fps and a lot of times, I still play many games on Console. Why else do you think many PC gamers also have at least one of the next gen consoles? Sometimes for me, I like the simplicity of a console...that won't change with the Neo/Scorpio.
 
But if you think what happened to sony when they tried to slim the ps4, why would microsoft pay more to keep the same specs when they could pull a neo but at the same time crank it up a few notches.

Potentially because of the ESRAM. They may just want to gut that RAM configuration outright with Scorpio (potentially also breaking some compatibility, but this is easier to introduce if its a "new cycle of Xbox") and just launching a watered-down "Neo-like" with the Jaguars and ESRAM just wasn't worth it long-term, but in the meantime they don't have much else as an option aside from paying to get shrunk for a Slim.

Meanwhile, Neo doesn't have an ESRAM issue, and for Sony it was cheaper to just do a "Neo" and move everything forward, but is still going to be straddled with the Jaguar or cat-family, despite a much more sizeable GPU.

Coming out next year will allow the Scorpio to shed all of its shortcomings in the One, potentially.

Neo will bind Sony's hands in terms of a "response" though as I can't imagine they'd want to rapidly introduce yet another power-revision to compete, and Nintendo is most certainly not (at least right off the bat) getting involved in this competition. So Scorpio may go completely unchallenged for quite some time.
 
If the 5.5TF AMD card is out now, why can't Sony put that one in Neo? The rumored delay might be to beef it up a notch and beat MS yet again.
 
If the 5.5TF AMD card is out now, why can't Sony put that one in Neo? The rumored delay might be to beef it up a notch and beat MS yet again.

The Neo APU was made months and months ago, and gone through rigorous testing and certification to be ready for mass production (with dev kits out in the wild). Its not a PC, it doesn't have a discrete card they can just hot-swap out.
 
itshappening.gif?

Wouldn't be crazy to think the RX 480 will form the basis of Scorpio's APU? A retail $199 5.5TF GPU should be able to squeeze it's way into a loss leading $399 console right?

They can. Have to remember that is $199.99 at retail and if they are partnering with AMD the cost to MS would be significantly lower. Also the materials AMD uses to create a consumer GPU would not be needed so there would be some savings there as well. I would think, just estimating that MS would be paying about $140 or so for the chip, which is damn good. If they equip it with a good CPU and fast RAM, Scorpio could be a beast.
 
For those saying Sony should delay their launch scheduled for this year, Sony doesn't have to damage control against Scorpio, or rather its unnecessary that they do so.

The fact of the matter is Sony is releasing earlier and MS is releasing later. That what the power differential will represent in the end, and there's really nothing to be done about it
 
The Neo APU was made months and months ago, and gone through rigorous testing and certification to be ready for mass production (with dev kits out in the wild). Its not a PC, it doesn't have a discrete card they can just hot-swap out.
But if they push it to Q1-Q2 2017 they'll have several more months to make a new APU? Is it possible? Didn't SEGA upgrade the Saturn at the last minute after seeing PS1?
I just find it strange if sneaky tech-focused Sony didn't plan ahead better than this.
 
For those saying Sony should delay their launch scheduled for this year, Sony doesn't have to damage control against Scorpio, or rather its unnecessary that they do so.

The fact of the matter is Sony is releasing earlier and MS is releasing later. That what the power differential will represent in the end, and there's really nothing to be done about it

It also depends on how often they are looking to iterate moving forwards. They could technically release the neo this year and then another iteration in early 2018.
 
It also depends on how often they are looking to iterate moving forwards. They could technically release the neo this year and then another iteration in early 2018.

That would be a disaster and quite possibly the dumbest thing they could do.

That would kill iterative consoles for me (from Sony at least) instantly.
 
Keep in mind that the rumor is Neo release months earlier than Scorpio, if Sony can change, MS can do the same.
Sony is so much smarter though, I bet if they do change the APU they probably won't mention it officially until it's too late for MS to change theirs.
 
the 6TF monster is getting more real by the day.

But if they push it to Q1-Q2 2017 they'll have several more months to make a new APU? Is it possible? Didn't SEGA upgrade the Saturn at the last minute after seeing PS1?
I just find it strange if sneaky tech-focused Sony didn't plan ahead better than this.

Timing plays a big part. Like Microsoft's ability to go with DDR3 V's GDDR5. I think I had read that at the time MS was planning the Xbox One, GDDR5 wasn't cheap or very readily available in those quantities. Again, I stand to be corrected there.

If Sony has already set the board for Neo last year (likely given we started hearing about Neo in April) and dev kits are already in dev hands, then no way changes are possibly outside clock speed increases. This is just bad timing. Maybe AMD wasn't making these new cards known to potential partners until after the Neo was already set.
 
It also depends on how often they are looking to iterate moving forwards. They could technically release the neo this year and then another iteration in early 2018.

I don't think they would do that, how many they are planning to sell in one iterative unit will really matter the most.

Its important that they don't flood the market with similar devices super often. Having one or two a cycle is fine, but that could really do some damage to the consumer market if the frequency of these devices isn't sufficiently planned out
 
It also depends on how often they are looking to iterate moving forwards. They could technically release the neo this year and then another iteration in early 2018.

That'd be flying dangerously close to then sun. I think they'll have their hands tied until 2019 in this scenario because they went the cheaper route to end up with the Neo (which brings about a power upgrade and disparity), while Microsoft seems to have swallowed the pill to shrink the X1 and then played long for the much, much improved Scorpio one year later (which is when they'd introduce their upgrade and disparity).
 
GPU will be over a year old by Scorpio releases.

Going by history, Sony and MS have always used cutting edge GPU architectures. I would place money the Scorpio gpu will be more related to Vega, architecture wise, than Polaris.

True, but I do wonder if Vega is really a new architecture beyond Polaris, or simply Polaris thats much larger, more CUs/stream processors, TMUs/ROPs, ACEs and fitted with HBM2 / interposer

Maybe that plus a few architecture tweaks here and there, GCN 4.1. I'm a bit confused on all the GCN versions. I know Tonga was GCN 1.2
 
But if they push it to Q1-Q2 2017 they'll have several more months to make a new APU? Is it possible? Didn't SEGA upgrade the Saturn at the last minute after seeing PS1?
I just find it strange if sneaky tech-focused Sony didn't plan ahead better than this.

Don't worry, either Neo will be surprisingly cheap for 4.2TF or it'll be more powerful. Both MS and Sony have access to the same toys.
 
If Scorpio is using Polaris, then MS fucked up big time with the Fall 2017 launch date. They could have hit fall 2016 along with Neo.
 
Just finished watchibg the conference. I guess I missed it, but at which point was the "confirmation"?

He's talking about 'embedded devices' which isn't really a confirmation, but as we already guessed, doesn't really rule it out either.

If Scorpio is using Polaris, then MS fucked up big time with the Fall 2017 launch date. They could have hit fall 2016 along with Neo.

They are going for a stronger unit though, they aren't going to put out something more powerful at the same time...if they were doing that, they would have hit the same roadblock Sony did in regards to using Jaguar and GDDR5 versus potentially Zen and HBM.

Fact of the matter is, MS took the hit on the wait time versus Sony who was going for something this year.
 
If Scorpio is using Polaris, then MS fucked up big time with the Fall 2017 launch date. They could have hit fall 2016 along with Neo.

Microsoft probably wants to drop the CPU as well and not be strapped to the Jaguar for another few years.

But if they push it to Q1-Q2 2017 they'll have several more months to make a new APU? Is it possible? Didn't SEGA upgrade the Saturn at the last minute after seeing PS1?
I just find it strange if sneaky tech-focused Sony didn't plan ahead better than this.

And what about all of the work on the current design that's had dev kits sent out for it? Barring some minor last-minute clock-changes, are they going to throw all of that out? All of the "must include Neo-mode" mandates their enforcing and work that has likely been done?

They have what they made. Microsoft had a completely different plan.
 
Well done MS, you have successfully kill Neo hype with a leak.
What a smart move, thanks for killing Sony's half gen shit.
 
That would be a disaster and quite possibly the dumbest thing they could do.

That would kill iterative consoles for me (from Sony at least) instantly.

I don't think they would do that, how many they are planning to sell in one iterative unit will really matter the most.

Its important that they don't flood the market with similar devices super often. Having one or two a cycle is fine, but that could really do some damage to the consumer market if the frequency of these devices isn't sufficiently planned out

That'd be flying dangerously close to then sun. I think they'll have their hands tied until 2019 in this scenario because they went the cheaper route to end up with the Neo (which brings about a power upgrade and disparity), while Microsoft seems to have swallowed the pill to shrink the X1 and then played long for the much, much improved Scorpio one year later (which is when they'd introduce their upgrade and disparity).

It all depends on how the market takes to these first batch of iterative devices. Plus they can't keep on manufacturing the OG ps4 forever, so that will likely get discontinued (but still supported) when the next round comes out. 2013-2018 is a decent run for the ps4.

Don't be surprised if it happens every couple of years.
 
Top Bottom