Mass shooting at Orlando gay nightclub [50 dead, 53 injured]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I should make a spreadsheet I can take out everytime this thing is asked, because it's a lot of work. I'll spend the time later and post it here.
Sure, more homicides will be committed with guns, but not overall homicides.

In other words, people just stab, beat or do other things to kill each other instead of using firearms.

So you want to tell me that it would be just as easy to kill 20 people with a knife?
 
I should make a spreadsheet I can take out everytime this thing is asked, because it's a lot of work. I'll spend the time later and post it here.
Sure, more homicides will be committed with guns, but not overall homicides.

In other words, people just stab, beat or do other things to kill each other instead of using firearms.

Can you quickly stab 20 people to death?
 
I should make a spreadsheet I can take out everytime this thing is asked, because it's a lot of work. I'll spend the time later and post it here.
Sure, more homicides will be committed with guns, but not overall homicides.

In other words, people just stab, beat or do other things to kill each other instead of using firearms.

When was the last time you heard of a nightclub massacre with a knife ?
 
Why would they use a knife in a mass murder attempt when explosives would be easy enough to concoct? Not as easy as opening fire on a crowd but if your goal is to kill as many people as possible the next choice would be a bomb.

So, you want to ban guns. That means you need most of Congress to pass an amendment, a president who would sign it, a majority of states to ratify it. We don't have that. Nothing NEAR that, in fact.

Australia doesn't have the same system -- it was easier for them t o do so. Our system was built with distrust for each other and themselves, so they limited the powers of each of the three branches.

Not to mention what would happen if it was actually attempted, tens of millions in this country would go absolutely apeshit. Politicians supporting it would need to all be under protection 24/7 and probably covered from head to toe with body armor.


Shit isn't going to change until the 200+ years of ingrained gun culture changes.
 
Talk of gun reform is nice, but unlikely to have made a difference in someone possibly linked to Islamic terror groups

How would many people obtain guns if sales were well regulated, had background checks and mandated wait periods? Sure, some would fall through the cracks but still many crimes would be prevented.

If someone is linked to an Islamic terror group, odds are they will be on a watch list.

Obviously this needs to be backed up with a system of identifying, registering and recording as many guns and owners as possible, but it's not an unknowable solution here. It's done in many other countries.
 
"This isn't a crowd that you would suspect would be carrying guns into a venue like this," he said of fans of Before You Exit, an Orlando pop/rock band.

I guess it's time to start viewing everybody through the same lens reserved for a select few...

Or just continue to harass & profile the ones you feel scared of and continue let the ones who really want to kill you to walk right by.
 
United Kingdom-
Firearms per 100 people: 6.7
Homicides per 100.000 people: 1.0

Denmark-
Firearms per 100 people: 12.0
Homicides per 100.000 people: 1.0

Sweden-
Firearms per 100 people: 31.6
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.9

Switzerland-
Firearms per 100 people: 45.7
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.5

Germany-
Firearms per 100 people: 30.3
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.9

Sources: 1 and 2

I could go on and on and on.
 
I should make a spreadsheet I can take out everytime this thing is asked, because it's a lot of work. I'll spend the time later and post it here.
Sure, more homicides will be committed with guns, but not overall homicides.

In other words, people just stab, beat or do other things to kill each other instead of using firearms.
Sure, but meanwhile, this was posted in the Christina Grimmie thread.
_85876097_homicides_guns_624_v3.png

It seems to show that gun-related homicide is a major component of the US's homicide rate per capita compared to other developed countries. Appears contradictory to what you're claiming.

Also you discount the effectiveness and lethality of guns compared to what other alternatives people may use to kill someone.
 
Public opinion in the US is unprepared to accept gun control. In my opinion it will take (regrettably) a generational change before enough of America could accept gun control.

And that change will not happen as long as one side of the issue has a large, well funded advocacy group, and the other doesn't. It will take gun control advocates organizing, getting funding, and sticking with it for decades before there is a realistic chance for any action.
 
United Kingdom-
Firearms per 100 people: 6.7
Homicides per 100.000 people: 1.0

Denmark-
Firearms per 100 people: 12.0
Homicides per 100.000 people: 1.0

Sweden-
Firearms per 100 people: 31.6
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.9

Switzerland-
Firearms per 100 people: 45.7
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.5

Germany-
Firearms per 100 people: 30.3
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.9

Sources: 1 and 2

I could go on and on and on.

It would be interesting to see what the Swiss are doing to have such a high gun ownership while also having such a small homicide rate.
 
It would be interesting to see what the Swiss are doing to have such a high gun ownership while also having such a small homicide rate.
The answer is at least partly better equality and less poverty along with a more homogeneous population.
 
Public opinion in the US is unprepared to accept gun control. In my opinion it will take (regrettably) a generational change before enough of America could accept gun control.

And that change will not happen as long as one side of the issue has a large, well funded advocacy group, and the other doesn't. It will take gun control advocates organizing, getting funding, and sticking with it for decades before there is a realistic chance for any action.
Majority of Americans are in favor of reforms. Our chief issue is the NRA and a Congress that does not represent people.

I will also admit previous attempts at reforms have been useless as they have been focusing basically on the look of a gun. Reforms moving forward must focus on access, mental health, storage and safety requirements, etc.
 
Regardless on whether or not you think easy access firearms are one of the root causes - evidence shows they sure as fuck aren't helping, so what the fuck are you really trying to defend here?
 
It would be interesting to see what the Swiss are doing to have such a high gun ownership while also having such a small homicide rate.
Here you go

Do yourself a favour and educate yourself.

Swiss citizens own plenty of guns, but they are also subject to some regulations that would make American conservatives shit their pants. For starters, all firearms must be stored in a safe, owners must pass stringent evaluation checks, endure proper firearms training and renew their licenses. Weapons are also registered to their owners, who cannot sell them as they please, as transactions are thoroughly documented. You also need to identify yourself when purchasing ammunition. Also, you need a firearms permit in order to purchase ammunition.

All of these policies closely mirror those of the rest of Europe and ensure that it's extremely difficult for criminals and unstable people to get a firearm. They also nip straw sellers at the bud, which are the main source of the firearms used by criminals in the United States.

Furthermore, in the case of state-issued firearms (read: army guns), you are not even allowed to open one of your ammunition tins without approval. Do that and you'll find yourself in deep shit.

Oh, gee. I wonder why the Switzerland's gun crime rates are so low. Maybe it's because THEY HAVE FUCKING SENSIBLE FIREARMS REGULATIONS.
 
And more training with weapons.
Another reason for sure.

The point I was making, and that I unfortunately have to keep on making.

More firearms does not = more homicides.

The U.S is a case in of itself because it has so many other issues that Europe is without.
 
What the fuck? How? I know Carson is a loon, but just how?

Basically said gay people need to understand that Islamists hate them and to stop trying to go against the right wing, or else more atrocities like this will happen. He's blathering on now and literally just said peaceful Muslims are "afraid" and "that they need to understand they need to work with us and that if they refuse to work with us then I'm afraid that perhaps some of the darker elements of our nature may take hold of our actions". Sweet merciful Christ!
 
I have a hard time pinning all the blame on the NRA. They deserve a lot of it to be sure but they couldn't do it without the help from the average person. Far too many people take the constitution as gospel when it should be a living, breathing document.

I mean, look at the automobile industry. They're very rich and powerful but they've been forced by the government to spend billions of dollars making cars safer. this is what 50 years of that looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtxd27jlZ_g . and in 50 more years we'll be able to take a self driving car to commit a mass shooting.
 
So sad what happened. This needs to end.

Two thoughts:

1) Finally a mass shooting by a US-born citizen is rightly called "domestic terrorism." Oh, wait... the suspect was a Muslim born to Afghan parents. Guess that's why.

2) The US banned Kinder Eggs, and can fine you $5000 for bringing one across the border, because a few useless children choked to death on them. But, tens of thousands of people a year are shot to death, and guns are perfectly fine, because millions of adult children will throw a temper tantrum if they're taken away.
 
United Kingdom-
Firearms per 100 people: 6.7
Homicides per 100.000 people: 1.0

Denmark-
Firearms per 100 people: 12.0
Homicides per 100.000 people: 1.0

Sweden-
Firearms per 100 people: 31.6
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.9

Switzerland-
Firearms per 100 people: 45.7
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.5

Germany-
Firearms per 100 people: 30.3
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.9

Sources: 1 and 2

I could go on and on and on.
1. You've omitted the US from those stats.
2. You've made no mention of gun control laws in those countries.

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/c...ilian_firearm_possession/10,50,69,178,194,177

I'm not sure if you're being intentionally misleading or what. The difference with the US and most other countries is responsible gun control. That doesn't mean a ban on guns. Australia enacted responsible gun control laws 20 years ago and still has somewhat high gun ownership compared to, say, the UK.
 
Ugh, RIP to the dead and I hope the survivors recover.

Definitely want to know the details. Was this guy some wannabe jihadist, did he have online communications with any groups, or was he just another home grown crazy off his meds with access to firearms? Or some combo?

This was definitely planned.
 
Another reason for sure.

The point I was making, and that I unfortunately have to keep on making.

More firearms does not = more homicides.

The U.S is a case in of itself because it has so many other issues that Europe is without.

But what about less firearms = less homicide?

And most gun deaths aren't homicides, correct? So even less accidental deaths would be worth the restrictions.
 
Basically said gay people need to understand that Islamists hate them and to stop trying to go against the right wing, or else more atrocities like this will happen. He's blathering on now and literally just said peaceful Muslims are "afraid" and "that they need to understand they need to work with us and that if they refuse to work with us then I'm afraid that perhaps some of the darker elements of our nature may take hold of our actions". Sweet merciful Christ!

Damn. This man belongs in a mental hospital. He is gone.
 
I completely share the positions of many advocating for gun control in this thread and ALSO very much think this thread is an inappropriate place for that conversation. Start a new thread.

Let's keep this thread centered on this awful act of terror, not the NRA.
 
1. You've omitted the US from those stats.
2. You've made no mention of gun control laws in those countries.

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/c...ilian_firearm_possession/10,50,69,178,194,177
I've omitted the U.S. because it's the odd one out, there's so many cultural and societal differences that it's not meaningful to compare.

I didn't mention gun control because it wasn't a part of what I wanted to prove.

I proved that more firearms does not = more homicides, there's no direct corelation.

There can be a bunch of other reasons that means less homicides, but it has nothing to do with firearms.
 
Ugh, RIP to the dead and I hope the survivors recover.

Definitely want to know the details. Was this guy some wannabe jihadist, did he have online communications with any groups, or was he just another home grown crazy off his meds with access to firearms? Or some combo?

This was definitely planned.

We don't know yet, it's an american citizen from afghan origin, apparently he wasn't known from services. There is a press conference in 15mn.
 
So sad what happened. This needs to end.

Two thoughts:

1) Finally a mass shooting by a US-born citizen is rightly called "domestic terrorism." Oh, wait... the suspect was a Muslim born to Afghan parents. Guess that's why.

2) The US banned Kinder Eggs, and can fine you $5000 for bringing one across the border, because a few useless children choked to death on them. But, tens of thousands of people a year are shot to death, and guns are perfectly fine, because millions of adult children will throw a temper tantrum if they're taken away.

average flag waving american: america is the greatest country on earth we can do anything!

rational person: we have too many gun deaths we need to do something about this

average flag waving american: that's impossible there's already too many guns out there.
 
Ugh, RIP to the dead and I hope the survivors recover.

Definitely want to know the details. Was this guy some wannabe jihadist, did he have online communications with any groups, or was he just another home grown crazy off his meds with access to firearms? Or some combo?

This was definitely planned.

His target being a gay nightclub could be coincidental or convenient but it's certainly worth looking into as a factor. Not like there aren't plenty of people out there who still have insane hatred of homosexuality.
 
We don't know yet, it' an american citizen from afghan origin, apparently he wasn't known from services. There is a press conference in 15mn.

CNN now saying:

Orlando authorities said they consider the violence an act of domestic terror. The FBI is involved. While investigators are exploring all angles, they "have suggestions the individual has leanings towards (Islamic terrorism), but right now we can't say definitely," said Ron Hopper, assistant special agent in charge of the FBI's Orlando bureau.
 
But what about less firearms = less homicide?

And most gun deaths aren't homicides, correct? So even less accidental deaths would be worth the restrictions.
Did you look up the numbers I posted, they literally prove that less firearms is not = less homicides.

The U.K have 1/20th of the firearms of Switzerland but have double the amount of homicides.

In Europe the vast majority of gun deaths are suicides.
 
I should make a spreadsheet I can take out everytime this thing is asked, because it's a lot of work. I'll spend the time later and post it here.
Sure, more homicides will be committed with guns, but not overall homicides.

In other words, people just stab, beat or do other things to kill each other instead of using firearms.

Don't use stupid talking points as an argument.
 
His target being a gay nightclub could be coincidental or convenient but it's certainly worth looking into as a factor. Not like there aren't plenty of people out there who still have insane hatred of homosexuality.

I doubt it's coincidental, but it might have been convenient. I suspect he would have terrorized any place with a bunch of people, it just so happens this club was close enough for him to get to easily and also happened to cater to a group he hates.
 
I've omitted the U.S. because it's the odd one out, there's so many cultural and societal differences that it's not meaningful to compare.

I didn't mention gun control because it wasn't a part of what I wanted to prove.

I proved that more firearms does not = more homicides, there's no direct corelation.

There can be a bunch of other reasons that means less homicides, but it has nothing to do with firearms.
Cultural differences like... The Second Amendment and lack of sound gun control laws? What other cultural differences are you talking about?

So the US doesn't count just because it doesn't fit your narrative?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom