Public opinion in the US is unprepared to accept gun control. In my opinion it will take (regrettably) a generational change before enough of America could accept gun control.
And that change will not happen as long as one side of the issue has a large, well funded advocacy group, and the other doesn't. It will take gun control advocates organizing, getting funding, and sticking with it for decades before there is a realistic chance for any action.
It would be interesting to see what the Swiss are doing to have such a high gun ownership while also having such a small homicide rate.
Your contributions have been incredibly constructive.
CNN now saying:
I really wish authorities just STFU until they're 100% sure of what they're saying.
Cultural differences like... The Second Amendment and lack of sound gun control laws? What other cultural differences are you talking about?
So the US doesn't count just because it doesn't fit your narrative?
I proved that more firearms does not = more homicides, there's no direct corelation.
Just fyi, but the attacks in belgium were with self made TATP explosives - not guns.Essentially stricter gun laws WILL help reduce the incidence of gun violence but it won't eliminate them entirely. The Lee Rigby murder, Charlie Hebdo massacre and recent attacks in Belgium are proof of this.
The fact that most of Europe have a ton of socialist values ingrained into their society.Cultural differences like... The Second Amendment and lack of sound control laws? What other cultural differences are you talking about?
That's like saying open water has nothing to do with drowning.
All this is showing is that gun control laws have a huge impact on the number of homicides.
Do you have separate charts for hunting rifles, hand guns, and assault rifles?
Yes, you've had plenty of useless ramblings in your time too.Your contributions have been incredibly constructive.
I really wish authorities just STFU until they're 100% sure of what they're saying.
Basically said gay people need to understand that Islamists hate them and to stop trying to go against the right wing, or else more atrocities like this will happen. He's blathering on now and literally just said peaceful Muslims are "afraid" and "that they need to understand they need to work with us and that if they refuse to work with us then I'm afraid that perhaps some of the darker elements of our nature may take hold of our actions". Sweet merciful Christ!
don't forget our spectacular number of accidental gun deaths. also suicides attempted with a gun are far more likely to succeed.
guns are a huge problem here i don't know how you can deny it. how many dead is too much? like is there a number even you gun nuts would balk at?
Just fyi, but the attacks in belgium were with self made TATP explosives - not guns.
Of all things you choose this.America is a sad place.
That Obama video where he explains that while they can stop suspected terrorists from flying, they can't stop them buying a ton of guns, really says it all.
Lookout if your name is Omar cause there is about the be a witch-huntNot sure if his entire name was covered previously, full name of the shooter per CNN.
Omar Saddiqui Mateen
Did you look up the numbers I posted, they literally prove that less firearms is not = less homicides.
The U.K have 1/20th of the firearms of Switzerland but have double the amount of homicides.
In Europe the vast majority of gun deaths are suicides.
Another reason for sure.
The point I was making, and that I unfortunately have to keep on making.
More firearms does not = more homicides.
The U.S is a case in of itself because it has so many other issues that Europe is without.
That was actually my entire point, that you're still going to get non gun attacks by crazies. The Lee Rigby murder took place on the streets of London with ordinary knives.
Excuse the stupid question, but what's the reason they distinguish "domestic" terrorism from just "terrorism?" Arent the motives typically the same?
So what's the magic number of dead Americans you need to see before you're willing to talk about this problem? Just let me know so I can keep tabs on it. Once we got that number then maybe the right will stop being sniveling cowards hiding behind 300 year old laws to keep their toys like a fucking five year old. "Bu-bu-but you told me I could have it!"It's really fun when we try to build our argument around things completely unrelated to the travesty that happened here.
Tell me how many of these "mass shootings" involved people unrelated to gang/crime and then we can start having a talk about the problem of these "mass shootings".
If it seems cold, maybe it is, but I have a harder time feeling sorry for criminals getting theirs. I know there's often innocent bystanders and collateral damage, and that's really sad, but I don't think it helps anybody to disingenuously report that events like what happened here, happens every day.
If you're looking for excuses to exclude Switzerland so be it, try to compare Norway or Sweden then, also high gun ownership and very low homicide rates.Switzerland does not count because military service is mandatory and the assault rifles are stored at home. so most swiss adult men have an assault rifle at home.
however, it's illegal to store ammunition at home, but the weapons are still in the statistics. it's sad that gun nuts in the US keep bringing this up.
more weapons absolutely equal more death, period.
If you're looking for excuses to exclude Switzerland so be it, try to compare Norway or Sweden then, also high gun ownership and very low homicide rates.
I know it hurts having your core beliefs proven wrong, but it's a little childish to 1. call me a gun nut and 2. claim something contrary to facts.
Another mass shooting in America, how am I not surprised.
RIP to the victims, hopefully your country will learn and more people won't have to suffer.
I think you should compare the firearms ownership by both total homicide rate and homicide by firearms rate. You can clearly see there's a homicide by firearms is clearly a larger component of total homicide when there is firearm ownership is higher in the countries you selected (as expected). Contrary to your exclusion, the US fits in fine when making such a comparison.The fact that most of Europe have a ton of socialist values ingrained into their society.
Equality and poverty drives crime.
I could've included Czech republic which has their own 2nd amendment right here in Europe, here is the numbers:
Czech republic-
Firearms per 100 people: 16.3
Homicides per 100.000 people: 0.7
Yes, and I regularly see news of a single person killing several + injuring even more armed with a kitchen knife. How would all these mass shootings (more than 1 a day in your beautiful country) happen if not for the easy access to guns ?I've omitted the U.S. because it's the odd one out, there's so many cultural and societal differences that it's not meaningful to compare.
I didn't mention gun control because it wasn't a part of what I wanted to prove.
I proved that more firearms does not = more homicides, there's no direct corelation.
There can be a bunch of other reasons that means less homicides, but it has nothing to do with firearms.
Since you insist on getting humiliated here's some numbers on Switzerland (without accounting for all the other countries I provided)I don't know why you call this an excuse. is it really not obvious that guns without ammunition are less dangerous than a kitchen knife?
The claim is that more firearms = more homicides, if that can't be seen in overall homicide statistics then what?I think you should compare the firearms ownership by both total homicide rate and homicide by firearms rate. You can clearly see there's a homicide by firearms is clearly a larger component of total homicide when there is firearm ownership is higher in the countries you selected (as expected). Contrary to your exclusion, the US fits in fine when making such a comparison.
Your argument seems to be that the homicide rate will remain unchanged but the means of homicide will change if there were less firearms. None of the data demonstrates that. You'd have to compare a country before and after gun control laws were enacted.
NBC had a statement from the suspect's father. Apologetic and in shock, but commented nothing to do with religion. Did say that his son was 'disgusted' by two men kissing a couple months back.
Fucking awful. Sitting in the parking lot of Home Depot and heard on the radio parents breaking down because they don't know the status of their children. I can't walk in like this.
Excuse the stupid question, but what's the reason they distinguish "domestic" terrorism from just "terrorism?" Arent the motives typically the same?
Some reporter just mentioned the FBI is defining these types of attacks as "domestic terror" to denote there is some type of international terrorist influence involved. Think of the San Bernadino shootings and foreign influence, I think that's what they're aiming for now.