Mass shooting at Orlando gay nightclub [50 dead, 53 injured]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know man, I feel like most anti-gay bigotry is rooted in archaic religious prejudices. Violence on this scale screams "religious fanaticism" to me.



Yeah...fuck this guy.


Indeed fuck that guy, but if you seriously only think gay hatred is only related to religious fanaticism then you are simply wrong.

Go to Russia and look at the skinheads, NN and others who despise gay people, because.


It's a sad reality, but it must be acknowledged, let's not make for singular scapegoat reasons, there is a deeper, much larger reservoir of hatred out there that goes beyond just the religious.
 
Anyway, the Sandy Hook massacre left 20 dead and the Port Arthur (Which caused Australia to ban guns) left 35 dead. Now we have a massacre with 50 and maybe more dead. What are the chances of finally getting some kind of reform seeing as this is election season and people are voting?
 
Honestly the way way for gun laws to change is a mass shooting at a NRA or conservative convention. They won't rally care until it affects their own. That's my two cents.

This is still difficult to comprehend. I saw this thread before I went walking and thought "20? Shit," but 50? That number is just frightening.
 
We don't have to ignore it, I'm not saying ban gun politics discussion, im saying ban gun politics discussion from casualty event threads. We can have a separate thread for that discussion, is my proposal. But it would also require a redirection of these conversations toward there and an understanding that that's where it belongs.

The idea that we can't talk about guns in shooting threads, when there is literally a shooting every other day in the US, is absurd.

Yes we can also talk about the killer's motivations and the fucked up ideologies of madmen, but it's burying your head in the sand to deny the role they play in the constant violence.
 
I'm not saying it wasn't, I'm saying there is a fair chance it was simply a guy who hated LGBT+ people and not a person who was radicalised in the name of their religion. I have huge problems with organised religions as I am an LGBT+ person myself. I do see where you and others are coming from but I have a problem with it being attributed to radicalised religion as opposed to simply homophobia. The two can go hand in hand but as I said earlier most radicalised forms of terrorism are claimed as such and I will wait until that happens until believing this was anything more than a sick bastard that wanted to murder people like me for who we are and who we love.
Hated them so much that he was prepared to die? Please. Of couse religion played a role.
 
We did it America! 50 dead in one mass shooting. Here's to doing nothing, and see you when we hit the big 100.

wOcxEAb.gif

And there would still be no action.
 
An assault rifle?!

Forgive my ignorance but are these really easily attainable in the US?

If so, why?

I'm from the UK so this kind of thing just boggles my mind.


Go to YouTube and search for "gun collection" and you will see how easy it is to get a semi-automatic AR in this country. People are feverishly obsessed with guns to the point of buying dozens of them and plenty of ammo to boot.

The one I use to have took me 15 or 20 minutes to buy at Academy Sports. I don't think the process there is any different for an AR.
 
And then what's next? We ban hate crime and religion discussion from these threads? Where do you draw the line? Should the discussion only about the death count and who died in these threads or should we have separate threads for death counts? Just ignore the discussions you don't like and talk about what you want to talk about.


We ban console wars discussions because of its ability to derail threads, im sure there are other examples. This arbitrary line drawing you're talking about has already been done and makes total sense when there are things that will destroy the discourse of a thread and become the same argument about something elss every time.

The idea that we can't talk about guns in shooting threads, when there is literally a shooting every other day in the US, is absurd.

Yes we can also talk about the killer's motivations and the fucked up ideologies of madmen, but it's burying your head in the sand to deny the role they play in the constant violence.

We don't have to bury our heads for anything. Or "not talk". We can easily have a place where you can argue about gun legislation and politics without it becoming the topic of every thread where a gun was used.


Its just not thread specific anymore when every casualty event becomes a gun legislation debate that has no conclusion.

People aren't talking about this killer and the process of getting an ar-15. They're talking about the political ideology of banning guns, regulation, or the contrary in general. Its just a different topic but it takes over every thread and its especially bad because these topics have a solemn gravity that are diminished when it devolves into another gun politics thread.

I have no qualms with the discussion about the specific gun used and the laws involved with him getting it. Im specifically talking about the big shitshow going on that boils down to general gun politics.
 
Most guns used in mass shootings are obtained legally.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/sa...-used-mass-shootings-obtained-legally-n474441

The "criminals getting illegal guns" boogeyman is just as rare as the "rapist in the bushes".

Obviously to prevent the most shootings, we need better screening, training, and documentation for legal gun purchases. Or nothing will ever change.
Yet fucking nothing will change. This is so fucking sad.

It COULD be changed if people actually wanted it to but they don't. Horrific.
 
I was a student at VT when the 2007 shooting took place. Absolutely heart wrenching that anyone else should have to go through a similar event. No words for the disgust and sadness I feel.

People are the worst. This sort of thing makes me feel so defeated.
 
Most guns used in mass shootings are obtained legally.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/sa...-used-mass-shootings-obtained-legally-n474441

The "criminals getting illegal guns" boogeyman is just as rare as the "rapist in the bushes".

Obviously to prevent the most shootings, we need better screening, training, and documentation for legal gun purchases. Or nothing will ever change.

Or make less currently legal purchases legal. I would throw out a starting goal of 100%.
 
Ugh. I don't want to think about how many of the fatalities were because they bled out during the several hours between the initial shooting and when the cops managed to take down the guy. And so close to a major hospital, too. That's gotta be real fucking tough on everyone.
 
50 dead. No words can properly convey the terribleness of such an act

Its getting worse and I still don't think anything is going to change.
 
A (domestic) terrorist attack of this scale, that targets a minority group is a new thing to me. It sounds wrong, but to me it feels worse than a 'general' terror attack.

The tweet was sent via Twitter Ads so it was probably a pre-scheduled one set for 7am (at the worst time possible) but the man is still garbage.

It seems like an unfortunate coincidence; the sect he's part of probably just read that letter in their service today.

Shame he didn't tweet out Psalm 32, which is being read in Catholic Masses today.
 
I was in Orlando for the past week to visit my friends and I left and all this started happening. It's fucking scary to think about if i was still there I'd go donate some blood. Im just glad my friends are safe and their friends are as well.
 
Anyway, the Sandy Hook massacre left 20 dead and the Port Arthur (Which caused Australia to ban guns) left 35 dead. Now we have a massacre with 50 and maybe more dead. What are the chances of finally getting some kind of reform seeing as this is election season and people are voting?

none. there isn't a number of dead high enough for us to do anything meaningful. we might get a bill that bans or puts limits on "assault" rifles. which is a meaningless term. but assault rifles sound scary so banning them seems reasonable. and anything that gets passed will probably get taken to court and declared unconstitutional.

what we need is to repeal the 2nd amendment. it was a huge mistake and we are paying for it with blood. but i just can't see it ever getting repealed.
 
Supremely devastated. I'm so weak from all of this. My heart pours out to the families and too all of the victims who were just celebrating life and to now see it done in an instant.....it's just too much.

This just brings me back to what Obama said about gun laws in that town hall meeting he had recently. This is EXACTLY what he was talking about...this is terribly sad.
 
Posting this again because of the urgency.

If you live in Orlando or can travel to Orlando, hospitals are in urgent need of AB, O-negative, and O-positive blood! Please donate!
 
Anyway, the Sandy Hook massacre left 20 dead and the Port Arthur (Which caused Australia to ban guns) left 35 dead. Now we have a massacre with 50 and maybe more dead. What are the chances of finally getting some kind of reform seeing as this is election season and people are voting?
Somewhere around 0%
 
Think for a minute. Do you seriously think a republican politician from Texas supports a muslim terrorist killing americans?

Jesus, people.

At this point with the policies and rhetoric from the right they not only condone it, they openly endorse it.
 
I'm hoping you meant that sarcastically..

You have a major party's candidate talking about it seriously and people listening to him...

You don't see that kind of conversation on gun control. Although I am sure Hillary, like Obama, will eventually try.
 
Anyway, the Sandy Hook massacre left 20 dead and the Port Arthur (Which caused Australia to ban guns) left 35 dead. Now we have a massacre with 50 and maybe more dead. What are the chances of finally getting some kind of reform seeing as this is election season and people are voting?

0NgeYVS.png
 
Think for a minute. Do you seriously think a republican politician from Texas supports a muslim terrorist killing americans?

Jesus, people.

I don't know, would a Republican Senator from Texas who was running for president attend a conference run by people calling for the death penalty for gays?
 
I'd recommend for people who say the word assault rifle to actually research what it means. a Ar-15 is not a assault rifle, it's a sporting rifle that -looks- like a true assault. "AR' - 15 stands for ArmaLite for people wondering.

Please also be on the watch for people misusing the words "magazine" or "clip." This is very important to the discussion.
 
Think for a minute. Do you seriously think a republican politician from Texas supports a muslim terrorist killing americans?

Jesus, people.

People like him don't personalize this. People like him see a mass shooter and equate it to an act of god like a tornado.
 
I really need to find out my blood type. You never know when you might be in position to save someone's life by donating blood.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom