Rudelord
Member
What would small arms do against drones, tanks, etc.?
A drone operator is still a human, tanks are still operated by humans. Tanks are not good in an asymmetric warfare scenario (which is the scenario.), and need infantry support. A drone operator still has a base of operations as vulnerable as any other. A drone can't even hold a street corner.
There's also the small matter of our armed forces being an all-volunteer organization, and I'm sure the media would love every misdropped bomb on American soil that has some 'collateral damage'.
I think there is a vast difference between taking over this nation or that nation and taking over a nation that has the military, nukes, drones, tanks, etc. that ours has.
Honestly though, I shouldn't have contributed to the derail of this thread so this is a conversation that would be better held in different thread.
A government dropping nukes on their own soil has already lost. So you can just remove that from the equation entirely. Control would be the end objective, not the obliteration and contamination of land.
But yes. you're correct, this isn't the thread for this.