PJV3
Member
Wow a world leader that says 'I'm not giving an opinion, it's up to the people of the U.K.' That makes a change.
Lol.
I like that accusing the British of Blackmailing our friends in Europe isn't somehow worse.
Wow a world leader that says 'I'm not giving an opinion, it's up to the people of the U.K.' That makes a change.
so with the killing now being political, it has really effectively shut down the campaigning.... it wont be the same, all will be polite and I fully expect a 55% win for remain now as like it or not I have seen constant calls on social media for people to vote remain as a show of solidarity for Mrs Cox
It's not. Being against a referendum is a totally valid opinion.
Take Netherlands earlier with our referendum about Ukraine. Only 32% of people showed up. 60% of those were against. So now the opinion of not even 20% of people is creating a lot of problems with this. Is that fair?
We elect people to make those decisions, because then it is their job to be informed about these issues better and make an informed decision.
If people want to vote remain now, or now want to show up for voting, that is their decision. Nobody is taking advantage of this terrible situation in a bad way as far as I have seen.so with the killing now being political, it has really effectively shut down the campaigning.... it wont be the same, all will be polite and I fully expect a 55% win for remain now as like it or not I have seen constant calls on social media for people to vote remain as a show of solidarity for Mrs Cox, this killing as horrible as it sounds has benefited the remain campaign, and whilst no one official will ever officially say it, most would agree it will have a positive effect for remain...
after the vote and the killing is at the back of peoples mind expect it to be used by the leave camp for leverage, and conspiracy theorists will claim government involvement
I'd even put it as far as needing 50% of the voting population going one way. So if your country has 10 million people who can vote, 5 million + 1 should vote for the option on the ballot to make it valid.Referendums are great, but they need to have established requirements. Like..half of population voting to be valid. If there's not half then the result doesn't matter.
If people want to vote remain now, or now want to show up for voting, that is their decision. Nobody is taking advantage of this terrible situation in a bad way as far as I have seen.
I'd even put it as far as needing 50% of the voting population going one way. So if your country has 10 million people who can vote, 5 million + 1 should vote for the option on the ballot to make it valid.
Referendums are great, but they need to have established requirements. Like..half of population voting to be valid. If there's not half then the result doesn't matter.
This referendum looks a lot like the one we've done in France regarding the Maastricht treaty.My biggest issue with referendums is that they remove policy from context, and suppose that the voting public can judge what are often incredibly complex issues. I would much rather stick exclusively with representative democracy, vote for people who have a vision of how the country should be, and then let them judge and debate individual laws, treaties and so on on their merits. I also feel like referendums, being about a single issue, are much easier to be dominated by populism, fearmongering and so on than a general election is.
Just came back from Sweden, where I was invited to an Anglo-Sweden birthday celebration and I had never felt so ashamed of a potential Brexit. Everyone spoke English, spoke highly of Britain and were very accommodating. It's just really sad to see Britain trying to distance itself when Europe when Europe tries far harder to integrate us than one might think.
No one is planning to fit an outboard motor to the British isles and relocate us in the mid Atlantic. Like Norway we will still be a European country and you will still be able to visit your friends in Sweden, who will continue to speak good English.
Leaving the European Union would make the UK as significant as Guernsey, France's economy minister has said.
Emmanuel Macron told Le Monde newspaper that Britain would become "a little country on the world scale [that] would isolate itself... at Europe's border".
He said the EU should send "a very firm message" about the consequences of a British vote to leave the bloc.
Pro-Brexit campaigners say Britain would prosper outside the EU and develop new trading relationships.
I hope it's like 51% remain 49% leave. So Cameron still has major infighting to deal with.
in response to Putins remarks
I hope it's like 51% remain 49% leave. So Cameron still has major infighting to deal with.
Maledict said:I'm sorry but this is not true.
Why exactly? If Leave wins by 1%, do we also need a new referendum to make sure people really want it?the problem is, if it is that tight, how can it not be held again in 5 years or so, I mean I am all for democracy but a vote that close is a mess for everyone, even if it is leave...
I will call it now, if remain win by that little the next Tory leader will be under pressure to call another referendum I reckon
in response to Putins remarks
This wasn't in response to it. Macron has been saying this for weeks in private. We've had multiple group meetings with him on it.
Mr Macron's comments were published after remarks by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who suggested Prime Minister David Cameron, who favours staying in the EU, may have called the referendum to "blackmail" or "scare" Europe.
Why exactly? If Leave wins by 1%, do we also need a new referendum to make sure people really want it?
Pressure might be there, but they'd be idiots to give into that again.
the problem is, if it is that tight, how can it not be held again in 5 years or so, I mean I am all for democracy but a vote that close is a mess for everyone, even if it is leave...
I will call it now, if remain win by that little the next Tory leader will be under pressure to call another referendum I reckon
If remain win we will not face another vote on this for a long time. Suffice to say the business community is seething with Cameron over this.
So lets say Leave wins, by a small margin.
Cameron resigns, and Boris calls a new general election (as has been expected). A majority of MPs then campaign on staying in the EU (as the majority of parliament is pro-EU).
What then happens - the newly elected MPs will have a fresher mandate to use parliament to stop leave happening? given the election would be called fairly swiftly the party base won't have the time to deselect and chose new MPs for each area, so it's incredibly unlikely that parliament wouldn't have a majority of MPs who are pro-europe.
It's an interesting question - which would have the more appropriate mandate?
A close result is when a referendum causes more problems than it solves, it's been a fucking disaster and holding another one is the worst idea I've heard.
I fully accept that I will be wrong, but I just don't see how it settles the issue if remain wins with 51% and puts the EU issue to bed....
however I fully expect people who want to remain to say it does, just like leave would, but in reality I suspect something different....
Of course Cameron will take the win, after all is his party in power with just about 36% of the vote, so he does not care
If leave wins by 50%+1 we go, I don't want or expect anything different unless the economy tanks and the government falls.
But both of those things will happen on exit. I want to know what narrative the exiters will spin when the shit hits the fan.
As my man Michael Gove said
"there will be bumps in the road"![]()
But both of those things will happen on exit. I want to know what narrative the exiters will spin when the shit hits the fan.
That's when the people can decide to elect a Boris or a pro EU government. the UK can back down if it wants.
We will see what people are prepared to tolerate to be in control.
That's just about the least reassuring thing one could say in response to worries about economic decline and instability as a result of a decision he's pushing.
The sooner these fuckwits disappear off Facebook the better. You know the kind: 'I see through bias, I'm like a fucking ninja of political thought, I see all the MSM lies and know the only way is Leave'.
Fuck. Off.
Cox Death Impact
Stephan Shakespeare, the founder and chief executive British polling firm YouGov, told USA TODAY he did not think Cox's murder would lead to a shift in attitudes toward the vote, "but the nature of the campaigning will be changed and that probably will have an impact" on opinion.
We'd stay. Depends on turnout. But we'd stay. economy would tank while it happened though.
What if both main parties in a snap election pledged to stay?
oo errr, YouGov agree with me, as the tone will change as scare tactics get turned off, this lends well to remain as they have the 'status quo' ace up their sleeve
Will Brexit go down as the largest unforced error of the post-war era? Or does that honor still belong with the US over the 2nd Gulf War?
it was just a jokeas in my other thread I got launched upon for daring to admit I like the man
Will Brexit go down as the largest unforced error of the post-war era? Or does that honor still belong with the US over the 2nd Gulf War?
the problem is, if it is that tight, how can it not be held again in 5 years or so, I mean I am all for democracy but a vote that close is a mess for everyone, even if it is leave...
I will call it now, if remain win by that little the next Tory leader will be under pressure to call another referendum I reckon
Turn it the other way around, I'd be immensely pissed if we leave the EU on a 51% result.
With shit turnout, that's a joke.
My biggest issue with referendums is that they remove policy from context, and suppose that the voting public can judge what are often incredibly complex issues. I would much rather stick exclusively with representative democracy, vote for people who have a vision of how the country should be, and then let them judge and debate individual laws, treaties and so on on their merits. I also feel like referendums, being about a single issue, are much easier to be dominated by populism, fearmongering and so on than a general election is.
Sorry, but no. Let's not jump between threads mis-characterising what happened.
You got critisced because your liking of the man was based off a complete fabrication that was literally the opposite of reality - and your own stated reasons for voting for Brexit. When challenged on it, you then shrugged and said that you disagreed despite numerous evidence to the contrary. You're like a climate change denier - just because SOMEONE somewhere disagrees with it doesn't mean that there isn't a consensus.
People dislike Gove for extremely good reasons. You've failed to give one.
Cameron's idioicy ion not setting a threshold for a vote of this consequence is yet another mark against the man. He's an idiot when it comes to any sort of planning or strategy - it's just short term, focus group tested crap that always goes wrong long term.