Shots fired at Police during Dallas Police anti-violence protest (5 officers killed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mega

Banned
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

Yeah, they should have non-lethally shot the gun out of his hand and then non-lethally shot him in the legs so he can't run, avoiding all arteries of course, followed by giving him a cup of NyQuil to make sure he takes a nap before bringing him in.

Please stop with these fantasies that you have in your head about easy, simple nonlethal incapacitation.
 
Dude was killing cops, and wanted to continue killing cops. He said he planted explosives. Why the fuck would they want try and stun him and put themselves in more danger. Blow the murderous, racist, prick sky high for all I care.

SWAT team did what they thought was necessary, clearly. And it worked perfectly.
Amen.
 
Here are direct quotes regarding the motives...at the start of the police conference:
The suspect said he was upset about BLM. He said he was upset about the recent police shootings. The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people especially white officers. The suspect stated he will eventually-- that we will eventually find the IEDs.​

At the end of the conference:
He wanted to kill officers. And he expressed killing white people. He expressing killing white officers. He expressed anger for black lives matter​


https://www.periscope.tv/w/1YqGoZANoPQKv

I'm still slightly confused. He was upset about BLM in what regard? Upset at them for something they said/did? Upset that he felt they didn't do enough or didn't do what he wanted them to do?
 
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

What? No...not the same thing at all.
 
Dude was killing cops, and wanted to continue killing cops. He said he planted explosives. Why the fuck would they want try and stun him and put themselves in more danger. Blow the murderous, racist, prick sky high for all I care.

SWAT team did what they thought was necessary, clearly. And it worked perfectly.

Well said.
 

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.
Don't equate the murder of innocent people with the police using lethal force against a racist who just shot eleven of them, killing five, and then getting into a stand-off with police still shooting at them and shouting about the end being near and having placed multiple bombs in the city.
 

Calamari41

41 > 38
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

Go back to playing videogames where you can sidestep bullets, shoot the guns out of people's hands, and respawn if you make too brash of a decision.
 

johnny956

Member
If the L.A times is accurate and this guy didn't have a criminal record, that's going to be an eye-opener for many. What can you do to stop someone who doesn't have a criminal record?
 

cr0w

Old Member
Don't equate the murder of innocent people with the police using lethal force against a racist who just shot eleven of them, killing five, and then getting into a stand-off with police shouting about the end being near and having placed multiple bombs in the city.

^

The willingness to consider the shooter a victim of any sort here is unbelievable.
 

Tecnniqe

Banned
Dude was killing cops, and wanted to continue killing cops. He said he planted explosives. Why the fuck would they want try and stun him and put themselves in more danger. Blow the murderous, racist, prick sky high for all I care.

SWAT team did what they thought was necessary, clearly. And it worked perfectly.

Right on.
 

reKon

Banned
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

No this is not the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining. Can you take a step back and analyze the situation that you're talking about.
 
D

Deleted member 47027

Unconfirmed Member
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

You need some life experience, pal, and some perspective
 
Dude was killing cops, and wanted to continue killing cops. He said he planted explosives. Why the fuck would they want try and stun him and put themselves in more danger. Blow the murderous, racist, prick sky high for all I care.

SWAT team did what they thought was necessary, clearly. And it worked perfectly.


So kblowing up the guy who knows where he planted bombs is the safest and most appropriate approach?

You sound vindictive in the last sentence of your first paragraph. You shouldn't let emotion get in the way of doing what is right. Setting off a bomb is dangerous regardless of who does it.
 

Amory

Member
Why the hell did they do that? Why not just bring the guy in cleanly? They could have used the same robot to stun him instead of killing him.

Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

You're literally acting like you think this is a video game.

You come across as detached from reality.
 

TheFuzz

Member
It genuinely terrifies me that there are people acting like the whole robot situation was excessive use of force. What the hell is wrong with people?
 

Mahonay

Banned
If the L.A times is accurate and this guy didn't have a criminal record, that's going to be an eye-opener for many. What can you do to stop someone who doesn't have a criminal record?
In my personal opinion, citizens should not be allowed to obtain the kind of weapon he had outside of very special circumstances. It's scarily easy to obtain very powerful firepower in America. Way more than any single person reasonably needs.
 

warthog

Member
When you've got this guy who has been killing people and his intent is to kill more, even when the only thing that would be still working is his trigger finger, then your first priority is to make sure you stop him.
 

Hip Hop

Member
If the L.A times is accurate and this guy didn't have a criminal record, that's going to be an eye-opener for many. What can you do to stop someone who doesn't have a criminal record?

If relations were much better in this country, this wouldn't have happened.

That to me is the real fix. But it seems like an impossible thing to reach at this point.
 
Are people angry that they killed the suspect or that they used a bomb to take him out? If it was a sniper who shot him through a window would that have been any better? I don't get the outrage in taking out a murderous psychopath

Edit: Do we know what kind of weapon the guy had and if it could be legally purchased?
 
Don't like the legal precedent of purposefully killing someone with a robot. I understand he's a dangerous suspect in a standoff but in the age of drone warfare this seems like a dangerous path to go down.
 

mreddie

Member
Are people angry that they killed the suspect or that they used a bomb to take him out? If it was a sniper who shot him through a window would that have been any better? I don't get the outrage in taking out a murderous psychopath

I think some just wanted him alive to wonder why did he do it? But it's another long line of having no choice but to take him out or he takes more out.
 
Don't like the legal precedent of purposefully killing someone with a robot. I understand he's a dangerous suspect in a standoff but in the age of drone warfare this seems like a dangerous path to go down.
Sounds like the best path for this current context.

Take the fucker out. Stop him from murdering more people.
 

Exile20

Member
If the L.A times is accurate and this guy didn't have a criminal record, that's going to be an eye-opener for many. What can you do to stop someone who doesn't have a criminal record?

How did he get access to bomb material and sniper rifles? It was a short time between the shootings and the protest.
 

marrec

Banned
Don't like the legal precedent of purposefully killing someone with a robot. I understand he's a dangerous suspect in a standoff but in the age of drone warfare this seems like a dangerous path to go down.

Well for the Dallas PD at the time it was literally the most safe path to go down.
 
They released the name of the shooter

Micah xavier Johnson ,25 from Dallas/Mesquite Area


MORE: #Dallas suspect ID'd as Micah Johnson, 25, of Mesquite, Texas, CBS News confirms
 
So kblowing up the guy who knows where he planted bombs is the safest and most appropriate approach?

You sound vindictive in the last sentence of your first paragraph. You shouldn't let emotion get in the way of doing what is right. Setting off a bomb is dangerous regardless of who does it.

Do you not understand the immense risk that would have been involved trying to capture him alive when he's holed up, with a bomb, and continuously firing during a 4 hour long negotiation?
It was either blow him sky high or risk more people getting hurt, it wasn't worth it in the slightest.
 

Raven117

Member
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

Nope, it sure isn't the excessive forced used by police that people have been complaining about.

Active shooter, downtown Dallas, was already in a standoff and other tactics tried, and has demonstrated wanton disregard for human life including killing police officers, Dallas Police were justified in doing what they did. I think DPD's performance through this was quite good considering the circumstances.

3 other suspects are in custody (I think 3). This is pretty amazing that all aren't dead.

I am in downtown Dallas right now, and things seem relatively calm (though more empty than usual).
 
Wait, dead suspect announced to police he was acting alone?
It was just him?

No mention of two in Mercedes stopped and woman now? No mention of triangulation etc?
Yes, I am curious about this as well; based on the information provided thus far, the other 3 folks were not part of the shooting? I'd imagine they would have at least been mentioned in the press conference?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom