Watching the Warren speech. What is with the people shouting "We trusted you!" Did Warren have some shitshow that I somehow missed?
Watching the Warren speech. What is with the people shouting "We trusted you!" Did Warren have some shitshow that I somehow missed?
They are mad that Warren chose to be impartial throughout the primaries.Watching the Warren speech. What is with the people shouting "We trusted you!" Did Warren have some shitshow that I somehow missed?
She's supporting Hillary.Watching the Warren speech. What is with the people shouting "We trusted you!" Did Warren have some shitshow that I somehow missed?
Watching late news coverage here in San Diego, all local stations running with the divisions at the DNC that later dissappeared after Obama's and Sanders' speeches, they say.
AND, they're running with the Russian connections to the DNCLeaks. NBC San Diego interviewed several local experts (San Diego has big tech security industry) and all agreed that Russia was likely behind the attack and supporting Trump. Wow.
He may never recover from that.Not news, but holy shit is Jeffrey Lord a colossal turd or what:
http://mediamatters.org/video#watch/727696/page/1
Good on Paul Begala calling his as out.
They think that because she came out to support Hillary that she betrayed them.
No, she simply endorsed Hillary instead of Bernie. Bernie supporters always believed Warren would endorse them, not Hillary. For whatever reason.
They are mad that Warren chose to be impartial throughout the primaries.
She's supporting Hillary.
Not news, but holy shit is Jeffrey Lord a colossal turd or what:
http://mediamatters.org/video#watch/727696/page/1
Good on Paul Begala calling his as out.
Ultimately the choice this year is clear.
Not news, but holy shit is Jeffrey Lord a colossal turd or what:
http://mediamatters.org/video#watch/727696/page/1
Good on Paul Begala calling his as out.
Gary Johnson it is.
For those of you saying "don't worry, the Sanders supporters will come around," I have to ask you: "what if you're wrong?"
Watching late news coverage here in San Diego, all local stations running with the divisions at the DNC that later disappeared after Obama's and Sanders' speeches, they say.
AND, they're running with the Russian connections to the DNCLeaks. NBC San Diego interviewed several local experts (San Diego has big tech security industry) and all agreed that Putin was likely behind the attack and supporting Drumpf. Wow. The Putin=Drumpf link could blowup by tomorrow and do real damage.
They already did. 90% of Sanders supporters support Hillary right now.
We're done here!
A dude on CNN said 90% of Bernie supporters were voting for Hillary in polling.Gary Johnson it is.
For those of you saying "don't worry, the Sanders supporters will come around," I have to ask you: "what if you're wrong?"
I don't think the Democrats understand the depth of betrayal that these people feel right now.
Their once-in-a-lifetime candidate never even stood a chance because of a rigged political party.
Those are the kind of wounds that can take decades to heal and certainly will keep them home this November.
And yet she's losing to Trump in polls that were conducted before the DNC email fiasco.
Romney was beating Obama in a poll after the RNC.And yet she's losing to Trump in polls that were conducted before the DNC email fiasco.
Not in the poll aggregate.
And yet she's losing to Trump in polls that were conducted before the DNC email fiasco.
A dude on CNN said 90% of Bernie supporters were voting for Hillary in polling.
How does Lord laugh after that, gross
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
it's not todayOk, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
Not in the poll aggregate.
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
538's post about your quote said:We don’t usually spend a lot of time writing about the now-cast because — uhh, breaking news — the election is scheduled for Nov. 8. The now-cast is super aggressive, and can overreact to small swings in the polls.
Yes, in the poll aggregate, Trump is leading by 0.2%: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
Ok, let's go with Nate Silver "Trump would likely win if the election were held today."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-silver-id-favor-trump-if-election-were-today
So I went to youtube to find Michelle Obama's speech..
![]()
Really? I mean, fucking really?
Yes, in the poll aggregate, Trump is leading by 0.2%: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
Gary Johnson it is.
For those of you saying "don't worry, the Sanders supporters will come around," I have to ask you: "what if you're wrong?"
I don't think the Democrats understand the depth of betrayal that these people feel right now.
Their once-in-a-lifetime candidate never even stood a chance because of a rigged political party.
Those are the kind of wounds that can take decades to heal and certainly will keep them home this November.
Her RCP projected odds of winning on November 8th went from 72% to 59% throughout July
At this moment, all data and facts point to Hillary Clinton currently being behind and is losing to Donald Trump.
lol, wow. I really hope Hillary's team isn't naive as this forum seems to be.
j
law
OK
lol, wow. I really hope Hillary's team isn't naive as this forum seems to be. Her RCP projected odds of winning on November 8th went from 72% to 59% throughout July. Multiple polls show her losing to Trump. Scandals are continuing to plague her in the media that hit at her core weakness: she's untrustworthy.
At this moment, there's a lot of data and facts pointing to Hillary Clinton currently being behind and is losing to Donald Trump.
Brushing that off as "no big deal," or trying to find holes in those polls (as if you're statisticians) is astonishing.
I edited :-X dropped "all."
But seriously, she could lose. I hope y'all realize that and have a better response then "they'll come around."
Gary Johnson it is.
For those of you saying "don't worry, the Sanders supporters will come around," I have to ask you: "what if you're wrong?"
I don't think the Democrats understand the depth of betrayal that these people feel right now.
Their once-in-a-lifetime candidate never even stood a chance because of a rigged political party.
Those are the kind of wounds that can take decades to heal and certainly will keep them home this November.