And Warner Bros and Sony get death threats for releasing shitty moviesCharlie Hebdo's latest cover.
They received death threats for it.
Translation:![]()
Reforming Islam: Muslims, let it all hang loose!
And Warner Bros and Sony get death threats for releasing shitty moviesCharlie Hebdo's latest cover.
They received death threats for it.
Translation:![]()
Reforming Islam: Muslims, let it all hang loose!
And Warner Bros and Sony get death threats for releasing shitty movies
If a woman by choice wants to wear a burqa at the beach, who cares why. Let her wear it.
That wasn't what I was replying to. But in some cases not allowing oppression might be. Countries that have ratified the UN woman's treaty (such as France) are obliged to not help in the oppression of women in any shape or form. As an interesting case in the Netherlands this led to the Dutch protestant reformed party to lose their subsidy because they didn't allow women on their voting list. Even though no woman actually wanted to be on the list(!), the government giving out money was by some judges deemed as supporting the oppressive stance.Dictating what other people can wear is human rights? New to me.
Who remembers the Cairo '48 swimsuit competition?
![]()
Young girls and women shouldn't be socially pressured into wearing headscarves, they should be socially pressured into doing bikini contests so men can ogle them because FREEDOM! /s
I meant secular as in nonreligious, not secular as a form of state. In the latter I (sort of) agree with you, because a secularist state does apply a special weight to religion (namely that it is not allowed to infringe on government).Uhhh I think you need to retrain your brain to decipher what fighting for secular ideas is.
Fighting to be secular here would be saying implementing bans to control what people wear is ridiculous. It's the exact same logic many Islamic countries use to ban shorts/bikinis/tshirts. Ban what we don't like, and be left with what we do...
I don't know how you can't see the irony there? It's not a secular countries place to tell these women what they can and can't wear but to show them the values of the country and that people are truly free here and maybe just maybe some of them will step out from the oppression they may well be under.
You cannot force them out. That will backfire, lead to further divides and as I said before possible radicalization. The one thing France could do with less of right now.
Gee I sure loved the human rights in the second industrialization period of England with some cool worker rights and gentrification going on.
We didn't get to basic human rights through the second industrialization period, we got there through Hugo Grotius in the 1600s.Gee I sure loved the human rights in the second industrialization period of England with some cool worker rights and gentrification going on.
Where do you draw the line?
I meant secular as in nonreligious, not secular as a form of state. In the latter I (sort of) agree with you, because a secularist state does apply a special weight to religion (namely that it is not allowed to infringe on government).
Yeah allowing people basic freedoms like what to wear is cultural relativism and degressive ok. You're going above and beyond irony here.Yeah no, all the cultural relativistic handwaving makes you not recognize an actual progressive anymore.
I'm not even particularly in favor of a burkini ban, but I do think it is justifiable.
Fucking idiots. Let people wear what they want
More like "fucking idiot". Again, it's just one mayor pretty much going rogue with a decision that will most probably be reverted by a judge in a matter of days. At least two different associations are contesting this mayor's decision right now and most politicians have declared they are opposed to this local ban.
We're not that far from each other really. I can imagine a temporary ban on Islamic ostentationism on beaches close to Nice*, though I wouldn't support it myself as it skirts on principles of secularism. I think government's are not allowed to target religions specifically, however I also don't think religions deserve many special privileges other than that and governments can have a role in breaking through oppressive cultures.As much as I'd love a non-religious world I would happily fight for freedom of religion. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and in this case freedom to wear whatever the fuck you want. All important.
I mean personally I'm as secular as you can get, but I also understand and accept we are not going to live in a world where that is everyone's cup of tea and the next best thing is a world where the above freedoms are in place so discrimination can be weeded out.
Well, that's kind of the problem here.
This, it's unfortunately not surprising that it's happening in the southeastern.Nice to see southeastern France is still the usual racist shithole.
Burkas and Burkinis are stupid, so I have nothing against it.
Is there a limit to how many ppl you can put onto your ignore list? Let's find out!Reasonable. Outward displays of religion should be banned in public spaces, without exception.
The statistics that I have freshly pulled out of my ass show that 99.9℅ who wear Hijab in western countries feel oppressed and are so happy to see the government breakthrough their oppression. They also confirmed that those who are oppressing them will certainly allow them to come to the beach naked and a forced dress code is not going to persuade their oppressors to prevent them from going to beaches altogether.We're not that far from each other really. I can imagine a temporary ban on Islamic ostentationism on beaches close to Nice*, though I wouldn't support it myself as it skirts on principles of secularism. I think government's are not allowed to target religions specifically, however I also don't think religions deserve many special privileges other than that and governments can have a role in breaking through oppressive cultures.
*Edit: to clarify not to annoy Muslims but if it is based on an appraisal that it could lead to unrest. However I very much doubt in this case it's based on the latter and not the former. I specifically do not think the former is permissible.
You touch on two different, yet important things.
-Straightening your hair is a fashion statement
Covering your hair with a veil or skin with burkini is a religious statement.
It says : a holy book claims that women should be "modest in their appearance" in order not to tempt men. For a country that believes in equality between men and women, this is should not be ok.
-Nuns are tolerated
France is a Christian country.
Its history is christian and for many centuries, France was know as the catholic church eldest daughter. Why should it not fight for its beliefs and say that Islam is not ok?
Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, Quatar or Iran have no problem fighting for their beliefs and trying to impose them on others.
puzzling decisions that make you go hmmm?clothing not respectful of secularism
Oh stop it with your " they ".
Only a tiny fraction of french muslim women wear the burkini at the beach. Stop thinking that the most conservative muslims are representative of french muslims. This isn't going to make french muslims feel " unwanted " and they have way more bigger problems to worry about right now.
Thank you for being honest.
This is exactly what most French people believe. The whole laïcité thing is just a façade. It's like their version of "state's rights".
Thank you for being honest.
This is exactly what most French people believe. The whole laïcité thing is just a façade. It's like their version of "state's rights".
Thank you for being honest.
This is exactly what most French people believe. The whole laïcité thing is just a façade. It's like their version of "state's rights".
And they choose to comply to those rules. Who are you to forbid them? Oh wait, let me guess. They're brainwashed, right? Even if they think it's their choice, it's actually being forced upon them by the "patriarchal, sexist religion". In other words, you don't think Muslim women are capable of making their own decisions, and they need Muslim men for it.They choose not to? Or is it maybe a patriarchal, sexist religion that forces them to comply with "modesty" laws?
They could, they don't want to. It's their choice, it's really that simple. Just as someone who prefers using a bikini. It boggles the mind how someone can defend this, and then act like "freedom" is a given in the West. More and more Muslims are being stripped from those very same freedoms. At first it was the niqaab/burka (only showing eyes), but it was deemed a security risk. "You never know who's behind one". Okay, that I could understand. But now this? Okay, what's the security risk this time? "Public order".... Get the fuck out of here.So basically there's nothing between " half-naked " and the burkini ? It's one way or the other ? You couldn't wear swimming pants and a t-shirt to swim ?
Give me a break lol.
It's more complex.
France is culturally Christian but at the same time, it's deeply secularist.
France spent hundred of years trying to get rid of religion in the public space, including Christianity. A political candidate simply mentioning god would be committing political suicide in France.You have to realize that the criticism of Muslims is nothing compared to what the Catholic church got in the early 20th century. When we see American people swearing on the Bible, it's making us cringe.
We spent hundred of years trying to get rid of religion and suddenly you have Muslims, who are trying to bring it back. It's like having discovered electricity and having people hell bent on using candles. It's driving us crazy.
To be fair, there is a bit of karmic justice in all this.
France brought all its Muslim population to rebuild the country after WW2 and treated them like shit with no plan for long term integration.
Sixty years later, surprise, we've got a big problem on our hands and I don't see a clean way out of this mess.
but I also don't like parents enforcing/imprinting their religion on their kids, any religion.
So you're saying some diet oppression is okay because if you don't allow it, it might get worse? Appeasement approach?The statistics that I have freshly pulled out of my ass show that 99.9℅ who wear Hijab in western countries feel oppressed and are so happy to see the government breakthrough their oppression. They also confirmed that those who are oppressing them will certainly allow them to come to the beach naked and a forced dress code is not going to persuade their oppressors to prevent them from going to beaches altogether.
There was no plan for long term integration because at first north african workers weren't supposed to stay. Then position changed with "regroupement familial" but it was probably too much too fast.
Reliogion, in many ways, is just a vehicle for a series of individual and social values.
Lol, maybe in fiction world.
Reasonable. Outward displays of religion should be banned in public spaces, without exception.
It's a convenient store with a public lease, it wasn't an halal store to beginWhat's next, forcing a Muslim store to sell pork and alcohol? ... Oh wait, that actually happened in France.
why can't they just use a wetsuit, why does it have to be a burkini?
Can't see how you would enjoy the beach while wearing this thing:
![]()
Don't be so disingenuous. This is not about fashion, but people being scared of Muslims and the bombs they hide under their clothing.
As an aside, I don't agree with this statement. Reliogion, in many ways, is just a vehicle for a series of individual and social values. Are you arguing that parents should not imprint their values on their kids? Good luck with that. Of course, parents should do this, and those kids will grow up and be able to compare their parents' values with their own experiences and choose which ones to keep and which ones to discard.
As an atheist, I'm usually not in support of religious "traditions"... however, I'm willing to make a strong exception with Islam. In Europe especially, Muslims are constantly discriminated against. Now more than ever do they need our support. I'm firmly against this ban.