Several French cities ban Burkinis on beaches, citing "public order" concerns

Status
Not open for further replies.
Charlie Hebdo's latest cover.
They received death threats for it.

Charlie-Hebdo-porte-plainte-apres-de-nouvelles-menaces-de-mort.jpg
Translation:
Reforming Islam: Muslims, let it all hang loose!
And Warner Bros and Sony get death threats for releasing shitty movies
 
Dictating what other people can wear is human rights? New to me.
That wasn't what I was replying to. But in some cases not allowing oppression might be. Countries that have ratified the UN woman's treaty (such as France) are obliged to not help in the oppression of women in any shape or form. As an interesting case in the Netherlands this led to the Dutch protestant reformed party to lose their subsidy because they didn't allow women on their voting list. Even though no woman actually wanted to be on the list(!), the government giving out money was by some judges deemed as supporting the oppressive stance.
 
Young girls and women shouldn't be socially pressured into wearing headscarves, they should be socially pressured into doing bikini contests so men can ogle them because FREEDOM! /s

Yep, headscarves and burkinis are a symbol of feminism
 
Uhhh I think you need to retrain your brain to decipher what fighting for secular ideas is.

Fighting to be secular here would be saying implementing bans to control what people wear is ridiculous. It's the exact same logic many Islamic countries use to ban shorts/bikinis/tshirts. Ban what we don't like, and be left with what we do...

I don't know how you can't see the irony there? It's not a secular countries place to tell these women what they can and can't wear but to show them the values of the country and that people are truly free here and maybe just maybe some of them will step out from the oppression they may well be under.

You cannot force them out. That will backfire, lead to further divides and as I said before possible radicalization. The one thing France could do with less of right now.
I meant secular as in nonreligious, not secular as a form of state. In the latter I (sort of) agree with you, because a secularist state does apply a special weight to religion (namely that it is not allowed to infringe on government).
 
Gee I sure loved the human rights in the second industrialization period of England with some cool worker rights and gentrification going on.

I have not the faintest clue what you're arguing or how it relates here. Things were bad before so the present doesn't matter?
 
Gee I sure loved the human rights in the second industrialization period of England with some cool worker rights and gentrification going on.
We didn't get to basic human rights through the second industrialization period, we got there through Hugo Grotius in the 1600s.
 
I meant secular as in nonreligious, not secular as a form of state. In the latter I (sort of) agree with you, because a secularist state does apply a special weight to religion (namely that it is not allowed to infringe on government).

As much as I'd love a non-religious world I would happily fight for freedom of religion. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and in this case freedom to wear whatever the fuck you want. All important.

I mean personally I'm as secular as you can get, but I also understand and accept we are not going to live in a world where that is everyone's cup of tea and the next best thing is a world where the above freedoms are in place so discrimination can be weeded out.
 
Yeah no, all the cultural relativistic handwaving makes you not recognize an actual progressive anymore.

I'm not even particularly in favor of a burkini ban, but I do think it is justifiable.
Yeah allowing people basic freedoms like what to wear is cultural relativism and degressive ok. You're going above and beyond irony here.
 
Fucking idiots. Let people wear what they want

More like "fucking idiot". Again, it's just one mayor pretty much going rogue with a decision that will most probably be reverted by a judge in a matter of days. At least two different associations are contesting this mayor's decision right now and most politicians have declared they are opposed to this local ban.
 
More like "fucking idiot". Again, it's just one mayor pretty much going rogue with a decision that will most probably be reverted by a judge in a matter of days. At least two different associations are contesting this mayor's decision right now and most politicians have declared they are opposed to this local ban.

Good to know.
 
This is one of those "meaning well but learn to pick your battles better" kind of things. You're more likely to cause more harm than good. You're not giving women more agency with this targeted ban.
 
As much as I'd love a non-religious world I would happily fight for freedom of religion. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and in this case freedom to wear whatever the fuck you want. All important.

I mean personally I'm as secular as you can get, but I also understand and accept we are not going to live in a world where that is everyone's cup of tea and the next best thing is a world where the above freedoms are in place so discrimination can be weeded out.
We're not that far from each other really. I can imagine a temporary ban on Islamic ostentationism on beaches close to Nice*, though I wouldn't support it myself as it skirts on principles of secularism. I think government's are not allowed to target religions specifically, however I also don't think religions deserve many special privileges other than that and governments can have a role in breaking through oppressive cultures.


*Edit: to clarify not to annoy Muslims but if it is based on an appraisal that it could lead to unrest. However I very much doubt in this case it's based on the latter and not the former. I specifically do not think the former is permissible.
 
We're not that far from each other really. I can imagine a temporary ban on Islamic ostentationism on beaches close to Nice*, though I wouldn't support it myself as it skirts on principles of secularism. I think government's are not allowed to target religions specifically, however I also don't think religions deserve many special privileges other than that and governments can have a role in breaking through oppressive cultures.


*Edit: to clarify not to annoy Muslims but if it is based on an appraisal that it could lead to unrest. However I very much doubt in this case it's based on the latter and not the former. I specifically do not think the former is permissible.
The statistics that I have freshly pulled out of my ass show that 99.9℅ who wear Hijab in western countries feel oppressed and are so happy to see the government breakthrough their oppression. They also confirmed that those who are oppressing them will certainly allow them to come to the beach naked and a forced dress code is not going to persuade their oppressors to prevent them from going to beaches altogether.
 
Something that isn't in the OP is that the ban is actually only valid until August 31 (unless a judge declares it illegal of course). So we know the mayor is doing this for shock value and not for moral reasons. If it were for moral reasons the ban would last forever, not a month.
 
You touch on two different, yet important things.

-Straightening your hair is a fashion statement
Covering your hair with a veil or skin with burkini is a religious statement.
It says : a holy book claims that women should be "modest in their appearance" in order not to tempt men. For a country that believes in equality between men and women, this is should not be ok.

-Nuns are tolerated
France is a Christian country.
Its history is christian and for many centuries, France was know as the catholic church eldest daughter. Why should it not fight for its beliefs and say that Islam is not ok?
Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, Quatar or Iran have no problem fighting for their beliefs and trying to impose them on others.

Thank you for being honest.

This is exactly what most French people believe. The whole laïcité thing is just a façade. It's like their version of "state's rights".
 
So the next time someone tries to claim the moral high ground in the middle east by saying saudis do not let women drive....well kindly point them to france.
 
Oh stop it with your " they ".

Only a tiny fraction of french muslim women wear the burkini at the beach. Stop thinking that the most conservative muslims are representative of french muslims. This isn't going to make french muslims feel " unwanted " and they have way more bigger problems to worry about right now.

"They have way bigger problems to worry about now" says random guy on internet incapable of recognizing irony.
 
Thank you for being honest.

This is exactly what most French people believe. The whole laïcité thing is just a façade. It's like their version of "state's rights".

Are you serious? Securalism was put in place in France to limit influence of christianity in the society. Know your history.
 
Thank you for being honest.

This is exactly what most French people believe. The whole laïcité thing is just a façade. It's like their version of "state's rights".

I won't deny that France is culturally Catholic but for the vast majority it's surface level of Christianity. Secularism is way more important to understand the French mindset.
 
Thank you for being honest.

This is exactly what most French people believe. The whole laïcité thing is just a façade. It's like their version of "state's rights".

It's more complex.
France is culturally Christian but at the same time, it's deeply secularist.

France spent hundred of years trying to get rid of religion in the public space, including Christianity. A political candidate simply mentioning god would be committing political suicide in France.You have to realize that the criticism of Muslims is nothing compared to what the Catholic church got in the early 20th century. When we see American people swearing on the Bible, it's making us cringe.

We spent hundred of years trying to get rid of religion and suddenly you have Muslims, who are trying to bring it back and who seem to defy everything France stands for. It's like being a democracy and having people insisting on going back to monarchy. it's driving us nuts and it might be precisely the point.

To be fair, there is a bit of karmic justice in all this.
France brought all its Muslim population to rebuild the country after WW2 and treated them like shit with no plan for long term integration.
Sixty years later, surprise, we've got a big problem on our hands and I don't see a clean way out of this mess.
Deep down, it has nothing to with religion.
It's just good old fashioned revenge and rivalry between Arab countries rich with oil and their former colonial masters.
 
They choose not to? Or is it maybe a patriarchal, sexist religion that forces them to comply with "modesty" laws?
And they choose to comply to those rules. Who are you to forbid them? Oh wait, let me guess. They're brainwashed, right? Even if they think it's their choice, it's actually being forced upon them by the "patriarchal, sexist religion". In other words, you don't think Muslim women are capable of making their own decisions, and they need Muslim men for it.

It's the very definition of irony, do you know how sexist you sound?

So basically there's nothing between " half-naked " and the burkini ? It's one way or the other ? You couldn't wear swimming pants and a t-shirt to swim ?

Give me a break lol.
They could, they don't want to. It's their choice, it's really that simple. Just as someone who prefers using a bikini. It boggles the mind how someone can defend this, and then act like "freedom" is a given in the West. More and more Muslims are being stripped from those very same freedoms. At first it was the niqaab/burka (only showing eyes), but it was deemed a security risk. "You never know who's behind one". Okay, that I could understand. But now this? Okay, what's the security risk this time? "Public order".... Get the fuck out of here.


What's next, forcing a Muslim store to sell pork and alcohol? ... Oh wait, that actually happened in France.
 
It's more complex.
France is culturally Christian but at the same time, it's deeply secularist.

France spent hundred of years trying to get rid of religion in the public space, including Christianity. A political candidate simply mentioning god would be committing political suicide in France.You have to realize that the criticism of Muslims is nothing compared to what the Catholic church got in the early 20th century. When we see American people swearing on the Bible, it's making us cringe.

We spent hundred of years trying to get rid of religion and suddenly you have Muslims, who are trying to bring it back. It's like having discovered electricity and having people hell bent on using candles. It's driving us crazy.

To be fair, there is a bit of karmic justice in all this.
France brought all its Muslim population to rebuild the country after WW2 and treated them like shit with no plan for long term integration.
Sixty years later, surprise, we've got a big problem on our hands and I don't see a clean way out of this mess.

There was no plan for long term integration because at first north african workers weren't supposed to stay. Then position changed with "regroupement familial" but it was probably too much too fast.
 
but I also don't like parents enforcing/imprinting their religion on their kids, any religion.

As an aside, I don't agree with this statement. Reliogion, in many ways, is just a vehicle for a series of individual and social values. Are you arguing that parents should not imprint their values on their kids? Good luck with that. Of course, parents should do this, and those kids will grow up and be able to compare their parents' values with their own experiences and choose which ones to keep and which ones to discard.
 
The statistics that I have freshly pulled out of my ass show that 99.9℅ who wear Hijab in western countries feel oppressed and are so happy to see the government breakthrough their oppression. They also confirmed that those who are oppressing them will certainly allow them to come to the beach naked and a forced dress code is not going to persuade their oppressors to prevent them from going to beaches altogether.
So you're saying some diet oppression is okay because if you don't allow it, it might get worse? Appeasement approach?
 
There was no plan for long term integration because at first north african workers weren't supposed to stay. Then position changed with "regroupement familial" but it was probably too much too fast.

You know French political history quite well.
Yes, it started with "regroupement familial" and I still wonder what was the logic behind this decision and what happened behind the scenes.
De Gaulle gave Algeria independence in part because he feared that France would be swallowed by an ever growing muslim population, should former colonies remain French.
 
As an atheist, I'm usually not in support of religious "traditions"... however, I'm willing to make a strong exception with Islam. In Europe especially, Muslims are constantly discriminated against. Now more than ever do they need our support. I'm firmly against this ban.
 
Don't be so disingenuous. This is not about fashion, but people being scared of Muslims and the bombs they hide under their clothing.

I said wow. People are scared of a lot of things doesn't mean we need to pander to thier every whim, especially in a so called "democratic" society such as France. It's ridiculous and disgusting.
 
As an aside, I don't agree with this statement. Reliogion, in many ways, is just a vehicle for a series of individual and social values. Are you arguing that parents should not imprint their values on their kids? Good luck with that. Of course, parents should do this, and those kids will grow up and be able to compare their parents' values with their own experiences and choose which ones to keep and which ones to discard.

Islam is specifically about imposing Qurans values on people.
It's not "the religion of peace" because of the peace it spreads, but it is supposed to bring peace to people by imposing the same values.

As an atheist, I'm usually not in support of religious "traditions"... however, I'm willing to make a strong exception with Islam. In Europe especially, Muslims are constantly discriminated against. Now more than ever do they need our support. I'm firmly against this ban.

Muslims in Europe aren't really discriminated against. However, Atheists and Christians are in pretty much all of Muslim countries.

As of now, atheists are a lot rarer on earth than muslims, so why exactly should we protect and support this religion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom