MetroidPrimeRib
Banned
Maybe they are still coming but just going to be patched in as they had deadlines to meet
/Devilsadvocate
Yeah It'd be nice to get even a little clarification wouldn't it
Maybe they are still coming but just going to be patched in as they had deadlines to meet
/Devilsadvocate
I'm saying it's still possible to enjoy the game.
Which is it. It's flawed. But you can still enjoy it. Lies and warts and all. You don't need to scrutinise every centimetre of every game you play.
This thread was going alright for awhileSure and I can use my imagination and enjoy watching paint peeling on a wall.
I tend to agree, but that post suggesting people shouldn't care is just odd to me. The 'you'll get what you're given' reasoning. That's all well and good as long as it wasn't sold as something entirely different.We were talking about this the other day in one of the now-locked threads.
A) We think that, legally, only what's on the box and what's on paid-for advertising (i.e. commercials, billboards, etc) are 'legally binding'
B) Somebody who evidently knew his shit said that if you've bought the game you don't have a leg to stand on in terms of suing or anything like that.
And if you don't have any legal basis for being owed compensation, why the fuck would you be owed an explanation?
(I'm not saying it's right, just that it is what it is.)
I mean, do we really want to go down this line of argument? Minecraft was in the equivalent of an Early Access stage when proper rivers and oceans were added.Right, okay, let's drop the philosophical facts about how language works (that it's subjective regardless of dictionaries or definitions) – fine, functionally, it's evidently not a river, but if you're standing on a slope looking at the thing, while exploring this alien planet, you'd be a total dullard if you moseyed down for a closer look just to ascertain if it's flowing or not. The lack of flowing water in the game is definitely disappointing - but the 'river shape' is in the game and that's more than enough, IMO. They achieved plenty with the procedural algorithm already and they have a perfect base to build on. As somebody just confirmed - flowing water was added to Minecraft in a patch right after it went public - I wouldn't be surprised if HG add it into NMS at some stage.
I mean, do we really want to go down this line of argument? Minecraft was in the equivalent of an Early Access stage when proper rivers and oceans were added.
No Man's Sky is past 1.0 and is already a full price product still lacking proper water flow.
Based on what I've done so far, it basically just looks like if a planet has water on it, then there's just a plane of water surrounding the entire planet at a certain depth. No matter where you dig on the planet, you eventually hit that water.It is a current. If you are standing in it it pushes you in a direction that is showed case in the texture scrolling. It also moves and fills in a space. It might be primitive looking, but it behaves like water should. At least in principle.
Curious to see what happens to that body of water in NMS. If you dig around it will it fill in that space? Does it have current?
I agree.I believe the game should've been "early access" and worth $30 bucks. win win.
Based on what I've done so far, it basically just looks like if a planet has water on it, then there's just a plane of water surrounding the entire planet at a certain depth. No matter where you dig on the planet, you eventually hit that water.
There's no such thing as rivers. Rivers are the game generating river shaped terrain beneath this water plane.
I tend to agree, but that post suggesting people shouldn't care is just odd to me. The 'you'll get what you're given' reasoning. That's all well and good as long as it wasn't sold as something entirely different.
I wouldn't entertain anything on a 'legal' level - that's kind of OTT. I just think the way he's handled the info for this game is cagey and kind of appalling. I understand why people are fuming about it.
It's that shady 'i won't say it, but i'll suggest it' style of salesman bullshit - similar to that Aliens game - that makes my skin crawl, and it seems he does it quite regularly. I've followed this game for some time on and off - I pre ordered it, which i NEVER do - and even I was under some impression that it had some Journey-ish drop in drop out multi, along those lines. He's been incredibly deceptive.
Sure and I can use my imagination and enjoy watching paint peeling on a wall.
I mean, do we really want to go down this line of argument? Minecraft was in the equivalent of an Early Access stage when proper rivers and oceans were added.
No Man's Sky is past 1.0 and is already a full price product still lacking proper water flow.
IIRC he was also talking to press who had access to the game on Monday. I don't know specifically who received copies and who didn't.
That quote only mentions the press who didn't receive copies; not those that did.
Sony’s reps, who have been handling marketing and PR duties for No Man’s Sky, have informed reviewers that they’re waiting on a ‘pre-launch patch’ before sending out codes.
We were talking about this the other day in one of the now-locked threads.
A) We think that, legally, only what's on the box and what's on paid-for advertising (i.e. commercials, billboards, etc) are 'legally binding'
B) Somebody who evidently knew his shit said that if you've bought the game you don't have a leg to stand on in terms of suing or anything like that.
And if you don't have any legal basis for being owed compensation, why the fuck would you be owed an explanation?
(I'm not saying it's right, just that it is what it is.)
![]()
I'm saying it's still possible to enjoy the game.
Which is it. It's flawed. But you can still enjoy it. Lies and warts and all. You don't need to scrutinise every centimetre of every game you play. If Fable had been scrutinised to this level literal lynch mobs would have gone after Molyneux, it was so utterly unrecognisable based on how he described and hyped it.
Yeah! Completely agree. Just say something ffs. It's an incredibly poor look.I'm totally on board with you. Just pointing out that there's nothing owed.
It's just a completely abysmally handled PR situation. The complete radio silence from Murray is utterly ridiculous, I hope he comes out with a public letter soon.
This thread was going alright for awhile
Cool, thanks for engaging with me so intelligently, and enjoy wearing those blinkers. See you later.
Considering a large portion of the complainers haven't bought or played the game it would be hard for them to win any financial consideration. Maybe an hourly fee for the time they've spent watching streams and complaining on message boards?
Review copies were never given and the reviews were only able to give us information days after release. They had to take their time to review the game. I don't see how this argument holds at all.
Then, quite honestly, why did anyone buy the game? Why would anyone buy a nonrefundable game from an unknown studio without reading any reviews whatsoever? Regardless of the reason those reviews weren't available
Yeah! Completely agree. Just say something ffs. It's an incredibly poor look.
how can you say features are missing unless you've experienced every single planet/solar system in ever universe in this game?
How is this game the opposite of what they were selling? I'll happily admit that there are stark omissions, but the opposite?What's wrong?You don't like watching paint peel on a wall?
Do you see how ridiculous it is to tell people that they have to lower their standards in order to enjoy something that turned out to be the opposite of what they where expecting?
And you can watch paint peel for free. A whole lot of people paid $60 for this game.
What's wrong?You don't like watching paint peel on a wall?
Do you see how ridiculous it is to tell people that they have to lower their standards in order to enjoy something that turned out to be the opposite of what they where expecting?
And you can watch paint peel for free. A whole lot of people paid $60 for this game.
SomTervo is here, but whither SolidChamp?
SolidChamp, post if you're ok bro
how can you say features are missing unless you've experienced every single planet/solar system in ever universe in this game?
Yeah, gotta admit I'm intrigued to see what that's all about. Hopefully not just fixing the crashes.Well, yesterday he did tweet "we're going to make some people very happy with a PC and PS4 patch that's in test right now"
So let's see what that patch is about and what the plan is for the next one.
Then, quite honestly, why did anyone buy the game? Why would anyone buy a nonrefundable game from an unknown studio without reading any reviews whatsoever? Regardless of the reason those reviews weren't available
Anybody expecting anything but stability is in for disappointment.Yeah, gotta admit I'm intrigued to see what that's all about. Hopefully not just fixing the crashes.
SomTervo is here, but whither SolidChamp?
SolidChamp, post if you're ok bro
How is this game the opposite of what they were selling? I'll happily admit that there are stark omissions, but the opposite?
I'm not saying you have to lower anything. I'm not even saying you have to enjoy it. But equating this game to paint drying is petty and boring. You should heighten the standards of your critiques
Maybe don't get your hopes up too muchYeah, gotta admit I'm intrigued to see what that's all about. Hopefully not just fixing the crashes.
Maybe don't get your hopes up too much
More in an 'observing from a distance' way. I just want to see what they do and how they handle the current situation.Maybe don't get your hopes up too much
Then, quite honestly, why did anyone buy the game? Why would anyone buy a nonrefundable game from an unknown studio without reading any reviews whatsoever? Regardless of the reason those reviews weren't available.
(Also, early review copies probably weren't given out because they were still struggling to complete the game on time.)
here's a giant space exploration game with a sand planet!If people where expecting the things in the list to be there, and they aren't there, then yes, that is the opposite.
Well, yesterday he did tweet "we're going to make some people very happy with a PC and PS4 patch that's in test right now"
So let's see what that patch is about and what the plan is for the next one.
People really don't like that this game has been successfull do they? Lol.
how can you say features are missing unless you've experienced every single planet/solar system in ever universe in this game?
Two of the biggest press markets didnt have it, so who would have since you said some did?
PSA 2: We can confirm that there are advanced review copies planned for No Man's Sky later this wk. We'll post the embargo once they go out.
If people where expecting the things in the list to be there, and they aren't there, then yes, that is the opposite.
Let's not go overboard. "Opposite" usually means something other than "abscence thereof". For example, people often take the opposite of love to be hate, rather than indifference.
Let's not go overboard. "Opposite" usually means something other than "absence thereof". For example, people often take the opposite of love to be hate, rather than indifference.
I wasn't a person who was super hyped about this game, I was just mildly interested. I feel like based on what they always showed of this game, and what it ended up being is pretty shitty to the average consumer. Some of us because we're gaming enthusiasts will know and maybe understand that it was a small dev team...but the average consumer (and there are probably a lot considering how well it has sold so far), will only see a $60 game, that does not look much like what they showed it to be for years. And it's not very fun because of what's lacking to me personally.
But that doesn't mean that the entire game is the opposite of what we were promisedExcept went the opposite of "present" is quite literally "absent".