Darklor01
Might need to stop sniffing glue
Do you still think Neo is coming this year despite GTS being delayed ?
Yes. I believe a published delaying a game is a separate thing from the release of hardware.
Edit: I get why you're asking though.
Do you still think Neo is coming this year despite GTS being delayed ?
I think a lot of people are assuming we're more likely to see higher resolutions than higher framerates. Time will tell.
Also, there sure are a hell of a lot of Spiderman avatars...
I think it really depends on the proportions of the different layers. Get it wrong and it'll look bad, get it right and it'll be really cool. The finish on it would factor in as well.Then people will see video of it and fall in love with it.
it just repeats
Yes. What does GTS have to do with anything? Software gets delayed all of the time. There'll be plenty of games to take advantage of neo when it is released
Seems likely, only because offering a Slim and then a Neo next year would impact sales of PS4 overall. Better to announce both as two options of the same platform (similar to phones that run same OS, just larger screen / more GPU power for one of the models). Plus, people keep wondering why there aren't any bundles being shown off for this holiday, even though many are expected (FFXV, for example). Would be a great opportunity to make Neo bundles.Do you still think Neo is coming this year despite GTS being delayed ?
If true, given what Peter Moore said, are the specs even final let alone actual devkits?
If true, given what Peter Moore said, are the specs even final let alone actual devkits?
Seems likely, only because offering a Slim and then a Neo next year would impact sales of PS4 overall. Better to announce both as two options of the same platform (similar to phones that run same OS, just larger screen / more GPU power for one of the models). Plus, people keep wondering why there aren't any bundles being shown off for this holiday, even though many are expected (FFXV, for example). Would be a great opportunity to make Neo bundles.
FoxconnArtist: Embedded Power Supply
There might be some upclocks but I doubt it's drastically changed. Sony will have a year advantage, a larger install base that can move their games up to the new console, a larger selection of upgraded games from releasing earlier, and will be able to drop price once Scorpio hits.I am looking forward to the announcement. I wonder if the reveal of Project Scorpio forced Sony to go back to the drawing board and look at the specs of the "Neo".
This is a big change for the gaming console market and we will need to see how it pans out.
Considering the APU die is probably using smaller process, the heat / power consumption will be improved even with higher clock speed, and if the Slim runs quieter (based on the videos out there) than OG PS4, the extra 3cm are probably a combination of improved cooling and space for more internal power conversion.They better have worked out cooling then.
This is very much in line with what I'm thinking, though the alternate CPU side is probable, and that would allow over 5TF (slightly) if the weight / size are accurate from Foxconn worker.There might be some upclocks but I doubt it's drastically changed. Sony will have a year advantage, a larger install base that can move their games up to the new console, a larger selection of upgraded games from releasing earlier, and will be able to drop price once Scorpio hits.
If we do see better specs, I'm guessing the max will be 2.4Ghz CPU, 5tflop GPU, and ~250Gb/s RAM bandwidth. I'd be really surprised if it was anything more than that. Hell, I'll be surprised if even a couple of those happen.
PS4 Slim this year
Playstation VR this year
and now...
PS4 Neo this year?
![]()
I'd be so disappointed if devs go for 4k, which virtually no one uses, versus higher framerates. Obviously, it's not that simple a trade off, but you get the idea.
This is very much in line with what I'm thinking, though the alternate CPU side is probable, and that would allow over 5TF (slightly) if the weight / size are accurate from Foxconn worker.
The only mandate the company received was to keep the hardware changes invisible to the game developers, but that was also changed when Polaris 10 delivered a substantial performance improvement over the original hardware. The new 14nm FinFET APU consists out of eight x86 Zen Lite LP cores at 2.1 GHz (theyre not Jaguar cores, as previously rumored) and a Polaris GPU, operating on 15-20% faster clock than the original PS4.
I know Neo is expected to use Polaris, but is there any chance the new Slim, if it's moving to 14nm, would also use the Polaris architecture with the same number of compute units and clock speeds? It would allow them to use less power and would mean Slim and Neo in PS4 mode would be identical, rather than Neo potentially showing performance gains due to architectural improvements. It could also mean they could use some bad Neo yields to make Slim GPUs, right?
I fully admit the above might be nonsense because I don't know very much about the differences between how PC GPUs and console GPUs are made apart from consoles being SoCs (whatever that means) and semi-custom.
for 100% compatibility, i doubt they would be using polaris in the slim. They probably just shrunk the APU they were using in the PS4 down to 14nm. That's what MS did.
It would be too complicated because polaris's GPU is more efficient, so they would not be able to have Slim and OGPS4 run the same even at the sameclocks.
Why still no leaks of the Neo if its being announced next week? I'd at the very least expect the standard hazy camera-phone shot of the hardware.
Yeah, that makes sense. But then how would Neo handle it?
http://vrworld.com/2016/05/11/amd-confirms-sony-playstation-neo-based-zen-polaris/
If this older article is accurate in the following, what you're saying might be possible:
The article dates back to mid May.
What does this say beyond listing the specs of the console?
If we do see better specs, I'm guessing the max will be 2.4Ghz CPU, 5tflop GPU, and ~250Gb/s RAM bandwidth. I'd be really surprised if it was anything more than that. Hell, I'll be surprised if even a couple of those happen.
I'm not sure I understand the question.
http://vrworld.com/2016/05/11/amd-confirms-sony-playstation-neo-based-zen-polaris/
If this older article is accurate in the following, what you're saying might be possible:
The article dates back to mid May.
At the same time, we managed to learn that SONY ran into a roadblock with their original PlayStation 4 plans. Just like all the previous consoles (PSX to PSOne, PS2, PS3), the plan was to re-do the silicon with a simple die shrink, moving its APU and GPU combination from 28nm to 14nm. While this move was easy in the past you pay for the tapeout and NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering), neither Microsoft nor Sony were ready to pay for the cost of moving from a planar transistor (28nm) to a FinFET transistor design (14nm).
He said that he would not be surprised to see significant upclocks in the retail unit, and you posted that link and quote with the implication that he was onto something. But that quote just mentions the leaked specs.
Ubi were using quarter-res with 2xMSAA, so for a 4K target, that actually would be a 1080p base, yes.Utilizing checkerboard rendering to hit 4k will need a base res well above 1080p. I assume that if you're using a 1080p display it'll downscale instead of doing the reconstruction.
This fear is really unjustified though, because it's not in Sony's or anyone else's interest to push forcibly you towards new hardware. It makes zero difference to them whether you buy CoD for your PS4, PS4.5, or PS5, so there's no reason to withhold stuff from older hardware for any reason other than the hardware simply being unable to support it. Since PS5 is just a continuation of the same ecosystem running the same software, there's no rush to shift users en masse to the new hardware; you established the healthy user base for your platform six years ago, and now you're just growing it.I'm just not fond of the precedent it creates. If Neo is a success, then this busts open the doors for more nonsense like exclusive software and core features for future "mid-generation" hardware.
Not really. You'll still have that too within a given hardware iteration. Iterations will simply come more often than they have in the past, and you'll be able to upgrade more often, less often, or similarly often, at your discretion.It flies in the face of why I like consoles in the first place: generational parity.
This is what I'm saying. Sony aren't looking for a 4M+ launch like PS4 had. This is a premium model targeted at aficionados, and it won't become the mainstream offering for another three years, when PS5 is introduced as the new premium offering.Figure this would be useful for some folks:
In FY2015, Sony shipped 17.7 million PS4s.
For FY2016, Sony is predicting 20 million PS4s.
In Q1FY2016, the PS4 shipped 3.5 million, up 500k from 2015.
So with these numbers, by March 2017, I think it'd a safe prediction to say that the OG PS4 plus slim will account for 18.5-19 million sales of the 20 million prediction.
That should give a good indication as to what Neo is expected to do, and how tough it's going to be for Scorpio next year.
I like how you haven't let being wrong about the slim strategy slow you down in the slightest. It's like doing backflips while running at a full sprint. Simply spectacular.A glorified 'premium' mid gen refresh in place of a single traditional slim SKU, which they also happen to be releasing.
That article loses points with this part:
We now know that is completely inaccurate with One S and PS4 slim which calls into question the rest of the article. On top of that I believe Lisa Su confirmed in one of her investor Q&A's that both MS and Sony's contracts included the node shrinks.
That article loses points with this part:
We now know that is completely inaccurate with One S and PS4 slim which calls into question the rest of the article. On top of that I believe Lisa Su confirmed in one of her investor Q&A's that both MS and Sony's contracts included the node shrinks.
Eurogamer, I think, have stated that the cores are Jaguar vs. the article I linked stating otherwise. If the cores are indeed not Jaguar, the idea for me is that the CPU can do more in performance than expected and can be upclocked more than a Jaguar core, and they can still make adjustments there depending on where they are in the production process.
Am I completely off in my line of thought there? If so, I do sincerely apologize.
I like how you haven't let being wrong about the slim strategy slow you down in the slightest. It's like doing backflips while running at a full sprint. Simply spectacular.
The only other CPU it could be is Puma, which is Jaguar with the ability to overclock much higher than Jaguar before tapping out.
But we have no current indications of Jaguar being replaced by Puma in the PS4 NEO.
Instead, Sony and AMD hammered out an agreement in which Sony would adopt the 14nm successor to Jaguar as well as a GPU based on the Polaris architecture. According to Valich, the PS4K isnt actually based on Jaguar at all and will instead leverage four Zen Lite CPU cores. Well have to wait and see if this proves true; we havent previously heard of a Zen Lite CPU core. But its at least theoretically possible that AMD built a version of its upcoming architecture for Sony rather than going to the trouble of taking Jaguar down to 14nm FinFET. Everyone agrees that the GPU is based on Polaris, so theres no argument there.
What do you think?
None of the articles I read actually went on to say Puma, but rather this custom Zen Lite custom CPU concept.
Another article, in the middle seemed to agree with the VRWorld one, so that's throwing me, though it may be simply quoting/sourcing directly from the first article:
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/2...utely-necessary-for-vr-slams-ps4s-performance
What do you think?
Edit: odd, this article says four cores, the VR World one says eight.
None of the articles I read actually went on to say Puma, but rather this custom Zen Lite custom CPU concept.
Another article, in the middle seemed to agree with the VRWorld one, so that's throwing me, though it may be simply quoting/sourcing directly from the first article:
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/2...utely-necessary-for-vr-slams-ps4s-performance
What do you think?
Edit: odd, this article says four cores, the VR World one says eight.
Two threads per core?
So, the article may be completely false then? I was basing some of my thought on whether this was accurate since other later sources say the cores are indeed Jaguar.
Ubi were using quarter-res with 2xMSAA, so for a 4K target, that actually would be a 1080p base, yes.
I wouldn't put it so bluntly but yes. Bare in mind that the article is from May and subsequent info has come to light that proves the info wrong. We've had the Neo doc leak and now two slims that weren't known about at the time.
Like Inuhanyou I didn't think there would be a slim PS4 simply because I thought the cost and logistics of Sony putting the time, money and effort into three hardware launches close together seemed unlikely. Though I only expect Neo to have the leaked specs I won't rule out any higher specs because of what happened above.
I wouldn't put it so bluntly but yes. Bare in mind that the article is from May and subsequent info has come to light that proves the info wrong. We've had the Neo doc leak and now two slims that weren't known about at the time.
Like Inuhanyou I didn't think there would be a slim PS4 simply because I thought the cost and logistics of Sony putting the time, money and effort into three hardware launches close together seemed unlikely. Though I only expect Neo to have the leaked specs I won't rule out any higher specs because of what happened above.
So you are not completely unreasonable. Slim was written off as garbage rumours just like possibility of Neo being more powerul. We really don't know what is going to happen.
Just saw this. Hm, I'll let someone else do it. I'm about to record a small video on the PS4 Neo and throw it up on the channel. Don't want to work on mockups anymoreget rid of the black for glossy white and i'd be in love.
one more week...
Count me in as one of those that was surprised about the Slim with Neo coming.
So you are not completely unreasonable. Slim was written off as garbage rumours just the like possibility of Neo being more powerul is right now. We really don't know what is going to happen.
The only other CPU it could be is Puma, which is Jaguar with the ability to overclock much higher than Jaguar before tapping out.
But we have no current indications of Jaguar being replaced by Puma in the PS4 NEO.